https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523
Eric Fiselier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79556
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79558
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79559
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79564
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79567
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79542
Pierre-Marie de Rodat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||derodat at adacore dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79568
Bug ID: 79568
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 for pr70325.c
(with -mavx512bw)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79568
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Same happens for: -mavx512vbmi.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26388
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79569
Bug ID: 79569
Summary: Unrecognized command line option ‘-m3dnowa’
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: dri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #23)
> The model of shortening as much as possible for gimple, then widening to
> word mode at the gimple/RTL boundary is probably too simplistic. We really
> need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||43434
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79536
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Feb 17 09:51:38 2017
New Revision: 245526
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245526&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/79536
* fold-const.c (fold_negate_expr_1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79569
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79559
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79536
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far. I'll backport to 6, too, just dunno when.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79569
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Or we can remove it completely (retaining the current error).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79569
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> I bet this goes all the way down to r125180 or so, ix86_handle_option
> returns false for OPT_3dnowa. So, either the option should not be
> recognized, then we sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570
Bug ID: 79570
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in sel-sched-ir.c:4534 in
pr69956.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
ICE for selective scheduling in be run as first pass (-fselective-scheduling):
$ gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70252.c
-fselective-scheduling -fschedule-insns -O -fvar-tracking-assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79567
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Fixed on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79559
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79567
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 17 10:19:21 2017
New Revision: 245527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245527&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-17 Richard Biener
PR bootstrap/79567
* genm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |7.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
Bug ID: 79571
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in Max. number of generated
reload insns per insn is achieved (90)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58008
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79347
--- Comment #13 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #10)
> The new testcase FAILs on sparc-sun-solaris2.12, both 32 and 64-bit:
>
> +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times
> v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Maybe similar to PR58008.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79569
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79552
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 17 10:43:27 2017
New Revision: 245528
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245528&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-17 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79552
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79569
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Created attachment 40760 [details]
> gcc7-pr79569.patch
>
> Full patch I'm going to test.
Please also update text in extend.texi (... or with a combination of
@op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Host|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
Bug ID: 79572
Summary: [6/7 Regression] Segfault with -O1 and higher on null
reference
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79573
Bug ID: 79573
Summary: binutils make install fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79573
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
BTW clang diagnoses the issue with -fsanitize=undefined, but gcc doesn't:
runtime error: reference binding to null pointer of type 'const int'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> You can use -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks as a workaround for this issue.
Thanks for the comment, that's very helpful.
> But the C++ standard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, clang behaves the same:
> clang++ t.C -O2
t.C:4:12: warning: reference cannot be bound to dereferenced null pointer in
well-defined C++ code; pointer may be assumed to always convert to true
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79573
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
binutils is not part of gcc, it has its own bug tracker at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> Btw, clang behaves the same:
True. But at least clang 3.9 has some additional diagnostics:
null_ref.cpp:11:5: warning: binding dereferenced null poin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79574
Bug ID: 79574
Summary: ICE in want_to_gcse_p, at gcse.c:804
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79575
Bug ID: 79575
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in
mark_stmt_if_obviously_necessary, at
tree-ssa-dce.c:270
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79575
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Patch submitted to gcc-patches with docs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg01109.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79576
Bug ID: 79576
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p
in gcc/gimple-fold.c:6979
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The ICE is because on the DEBUG_INSN move_op_orig_expr_found removes it from
the IL: remove_insn_from_stream and then move_op_ascend -> moveup_expr_cached
2531 if (DEBUG_INSN_P (EXPR_INSN_RTX (expr))
253
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79576
--- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79576
>
> Bug ID: 79576
>Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in gimple_stmt_no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems before r197942 sel_remove_insn with only_disconnect true actually kept
BLOCK_FOR_INSN on the (temporarily) removed insn. But sel_bb_head would
certainly not return that temporarily removed insn, so what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79576
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79576
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79576
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Feb 17 13:36:39 2017
New Revision: 245529
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245529&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-17 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/79576
* par
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79576
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79576
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
>
> "doctor it hurts" -- "don't do that then"
>
:D Will you please create 'doctor-it-hurts=dont-do-that-then' keywords so that
I can decorate the PR with it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79577
Bug ID: 79577
Summary: Infinite loop with -fselective-scheduling2 -O2 --param
selsched-max-sched-times=0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79577
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Loops in:
#0 0x00a45e5f in init_expr (cant_move=true, needs_spec_check_p=false,
was_renamed=, was_substituted=,
target_available=1 '\001', history=..., orig_sched_cycle=0, spec_to_check_ds=0,
spec_do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79578
Bug ID: 79578
Summary: Unnecessary instructions in generated code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79577
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I guess so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79578
--- Comment #1 from Maxim Egorushkin ---
clang-3.9.1 generates code that I expect:
f(char*): # @f(char*)
movl$131073, (%rdi) # imm = 0x20001
movq%rdi, %rax
retq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79578
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79578
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Maxim Egorushkin from comment #0)
> 2. The code assigns through that pointer, so the pointer must be valid.
> Therefore there is no need to test the result of new for 0.
In any case, we fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79579
Bug ID: 79579
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in ipa_write_node_info
(ipa-prop.c:4931)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79578
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Since the check comes from the front-end, and the DR says it's not needed,
maybe this belongs to component c++ not tree-optimization. If the front-end
didn't insert the check we wouldn't need to optimize it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79529
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Feb 17 14:36:08 2017
New Revision: 245530
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245530&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Introduce ssa_defined_default_def_p function (PR tree-optimization/79529).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79579
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79574
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Feb 17 14:46:14 2017
New Revision: 245531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245531&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use HOST_WIDE_INT for a param calculation (PR rtl-optimization/79574).
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79577
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Feb 17 14:47:08 2017
New Revision: 245532
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245532&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Increase minimum for a param (PR rtl-optimization/79577).
2017-02-17 Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79574
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79577
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79529
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #9)
> But at least clang 3.9 has some additional diagnostics:
>
> null_ref.cpp:11:5: warning: binding dereferenced null pointer to reference
> has undefined behavio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced test case ...
subroutine gruppe
implicit none
type :: CGruppe
class(*), dimension(:), pointer :: el
end type
type(CGruppe) :: group
select type ( p => group%el(1) )
e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79578
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79510
--- Comment #2 from Pierre Chevalier ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> GCC doesn't define a __gcc__ macro. In C++ mode it defines __GNUC__ and
> __GNUG__:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Common-Predefined-Macros.html
Sill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79541
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Feb 17 16:10:59 2017
New Revision: 245536
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245536&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-17 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/79541
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69564
--- Comment #35 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #34)
> But as A + 8 >= B || A >= B + 8 is the same as ABS (A - B) >= 8 we might do
> better re-writing the overlap test in terms of this (of course it all r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77536
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397
--- Comment #25 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
"When doing so allows for simplification" is actually a pretty low bar here.
We just have to prove the widening cast is a common subexpression. Once we do
that, we know widening is a win. And that's rela
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Feb 17 16:35:37 2017
New Revision: 245537
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245537&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/76731
* config/i386/avx512fintrin.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79533
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 17 16:50:16 2017
New Revision: 245538
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245538&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79533 - C++17 ICE with temporary cast to reference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78690
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The #c0 testcase doesn't ICE anymore since r245440. The #c4 testcase still
ICEs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79541
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26388
--- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor ---
I agree with the goal of making containers efficient so please take this as
constructive criticism.
Jonathan and I discussed this on IRC a bit yesterday and I've thought about it
some more since then. I'm u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79548
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79580
Bug ID: 79580
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in nested_anon_class_index, at
cp/mangle.c:1604
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo