https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79464
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79557
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79559
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79553
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79561
Bug ID: 79561
Summary: Missed optimization: useless guards for
zero-initialized POD statics at function scope.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
Bug ID: 79562
Summary: sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: san
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Configure command was
$HOME/gcc/gcc7/configure \
--prefix=$HOME/work/7 --with-isl=/usr/local \
--enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --enable-libsanitizer \
--disable-libmudflap --disable-nls \
--enab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problem was introduced within the last 8 days. My last
bootstrap was
% gfc7 --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 7.0.1 20170207 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79561
--- Comment #1 from Marc Mutz ---
For a moment, I thought it was about std::atomic, but a simple
template container { T t; }
instead of std::atomic produces the same result.
So it seems like the = default ctor is the problem. If I remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:19:18PM +, andreast at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Andreas Tobler changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79545
--- Comment #2 from Carl Love ---
Author: carll
Date: Thu Feb 16 20:59:20 2017
New Revision: 245518
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245518&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-02-16 Carl Love
Backport from mainline commit r245
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79563
Bug ID: 79563
Summary: Same-name labels in lambdas considered duplicate
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79542
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79533
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79561
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this is a dup of PR 78940
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79512
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE: |[6 Regression] ICE:
|S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79549
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Tobler ---
Author: andreast
Date: Thu Feb 16 21:23:51 2017
New Revision: 245520
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245520&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-16 Andreas Tobler
PR sanitizer/79562
* sanitizer_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26980
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes, I see the error there. There are 53 calls to error() or error_at() in the
file. I'm trying to understand why you think this particular one is a problem
(and the others aren't) and how that problem could
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> Yes, I see the error there. There are 53 calls to error() or error_at() in
> the file. I'm trying to understand why you think this particular one is a
> problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78940
Marc Mutz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.mutz at kdab dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:26:12PM +, andreast at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #7 from Andreas Tobler ---
> Fixed on trunk.
>
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79564
Bug ID: 79564
Summary: [missed optimization][x86] relaxed atomic counting
compiled the same as seq_cst
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Okay, I've now read the discussion in bug 24222 that this one blocks. I think I
understand the design issue though I don't see how to trigger it in a test
case.
$ cat t.c && /build/gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc -B /bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79556
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67384
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67384, which changed state.
Bug 67384 Summary: [concepts] More fun with deduction constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67384
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67150, which changed state.
Bug 67150 Summary: [c++-concepts] Expression constraint fails with dependent
types used as a deduction constraint target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67150
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67150
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79565
Bug ID: 79565
Summary: ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Feb 16 22:56:51 2017
New Revision: 245521
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245521&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-16 Alan Modra
PR rtl-optimization/79286
* ira.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79099
Kostya Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60364
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61379
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71943
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79554
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79551
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79531
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79564
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79520
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566
Bug ID: 79566
Summary: [6/7 Regression] elaborated-type-specifier incorrectly
rejected in range-based for
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79510
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29445
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29455
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79503
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79567
Bug ID: 79567
Summary: Compiler-warning "unknown escape sequence '\x'" about
genmatch-generated C-files on mingw-host
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
101 - 154 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
