https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60403
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
and
float f(float x[]) {
float p = 1.0;
for (int i = 0; i < 200; i++)
p += 1;
return p;
}
both compiled in gcc 7 (20170210 snapshot) with -Ofast .
In the former case (the 202 case) you get:
f:
movss xmm0, DWORD PTR .LC0[rip]
ret
.LC0:
.long 1128988672
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79452
Eric Fiselier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric at efcs dot ca
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79295
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79461
Bug ID: 79461
Summary: [C++1z] ICE when capturing a variable in a lambda in a
constexpr constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79451
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79404
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Target Mileston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79462
Bug ID: 79462
Summary: sh: Stack smashing detected when building __ashrdi3 in
libgcc
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #44 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 10 23:34:49 2017
New Revision: 245350
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245350&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/79341
* configure.tgt (s390*-*-linux*): Don'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79462
--- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
Here's the configuration command for hosting on ppc64le:
CFLAGS='-O2 -g -Wall -Wformat-security -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -mcpu=power8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61582
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||P at draigBrady dot com
--- Comment #20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61582
--- Comment #21 from Tim Shen ---
(In reply to Pádraig Brady from comment #20)
> Any status update on this. GCC7 is looming...
> Thanks.
Unfortunately I haven't get a chance to work on this. I plan to put up a
one-line tweak on the internal stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21182
--- Comment #24 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Do we happen to have easy access to the pressure at the various program points?
Dumping that with the points might prove fruitful in both the search for
potential over-aggressive optimizations and to guide
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo