https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79301
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 08:30:48 2017
New Revision: 245270
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245270&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71824
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79301
--- Comment #3 from Anders Kaseorg ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> I think right now you need to use
> #ifdef __has_cpp_attribute
> # if __has_cpp_attribute(fallthrough) >= __cplusplus
> [[fallthrough]];
Surely you intended
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79332
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79301
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Anders Kaseorg from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > I think right now you need to use
> > #ifdef __has_cpp_attribute
> > # if __has_cpp_attribute(fallthrough) >= __c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79301
--- Comment #5 from Anders Kaseorg ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> (In reply to Anders Kaseorg from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > > I think right now you need to use
> > > #ifdef __has_cpp_attri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79421
Bug ID: 79421
Summary: gnat.dg/trampoline3.adb fails on s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79403
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
(Happens with gcc-6.3; 7.0 was *not* tested.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41339
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41339
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #18577|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #54 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Thanks Aldy, this makes it clear what happens, and it is actually
pretty simple.
The patch changes check_simple_exit to also return true if
check_complex_exit is true (as well as some other conditions)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41339
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
inline void __attribute__((always_inline)) __morestack_fail (const char *msg)
{
static char nl[] = "\n";
writev (&nl[0]);
}
void allocate_segment ()
{
static const char msg[] = "";
__morestack_fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41339
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Note duplicate entries in that list should be harmless (well, fingers
crossing...)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79408
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 8 09:21:57 2017
New Revision: 245273
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245273&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79408
* tree-vrp.c (simplify_div_or_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79411
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79409
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 09:35:41 2017
New Revision: 245274
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245274&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71824
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79409
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 09:35:41 2017
New Revision: 245274
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245274&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71824
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79413
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79416
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79420
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Version|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79416
--- Comment #2 from Marina Minkin ---
I was able to get a different error on gcc 4.4.7
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79375
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Feb 8 09:47:09 2017
New Revision: 245275
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245275&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 79375] Avoid passing NULL by reference
2017-02-08 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79397
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Feb 8 09:59:55 2017
New Revision: 245276
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245276&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix spelling of AltiVec in rs6000.opt (PR79397)
It was spel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41590
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
> Documentation patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg00560.html
I think you got the wrong PR here: your doc patch is about PR
pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79408
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79397
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79404
--- Comment #2 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #1)
> gcc is SVNREV 245184 plus the Fedora patches.
Also occurs with all patches dropped.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40693
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40693&action=edit
gcc7-pr79341.patch
Does the attached patch work for you? Only tested on s390x-linux (64-bit).
The intent is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79422
Bug ID: 79422
Summary: Use ACX_BUGURL for error in snprintf_lite.cc
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79422
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68606
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
A proposed patch for gcc 8 was posted to
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01158.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41517
--- Comment #5 from Jan Echternach ---
The testcases changed or added in bug 63326 comment 21 were all about #pragma
omp. I don't understand the parser changes well enough to tell if #pragma GCC
will be treated in the same way, i.e. if it will al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78847
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
A simple fold-const.c "fix" is the following:
Index: gcc/fold-const.c
===
--- gcc/fold-const.c(revision 245276)
+++ gcc/fold-const.c(w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79404
--- Comment #3 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x007e13fb in allocno_copy_cost_saving (
allocno=allocno@entry=0x149f340, hard_regno=2)
at ../../gcc-7.0.1-20170204/gcc/ira-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79375
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79423
Bug ID: 79423
Summary: Translation of warnings breaks IDE parsing of output
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79375
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Fixed.
Thanks for the quick fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79424
Bug ID: 79424
Summary: dtor synthesized before abstractness correctly
determined
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79409
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:13:53 2017
New Revision: 245278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:13:53 2017
New Revision: 245278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77318
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:13:53 2017
New Revision: 245278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-08 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 71824, which changed state.
Bug 71824 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE when compiling libiberty with Graphite
loop optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79409
Bug 79409 depends on bug 71824, which changed state.
Bug 71824 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE when compiling libiberty with Graphite
loop optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77932
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79413
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71351
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
sese_insert_phis_for_liveouts looks like complete bollocks in this case. We're
missing a definition that could be used for updating.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68606
--- Comment #6 from R. Diez ---
The proposed patch looks OK. But I guess I will not be able to completely
disable the emergency pool by setting STATIC_EH_ALLOC_POOL_BYTES to 0, right?
But at least I hope that setting a very low value will have th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79425
Bug ID: 79425
Summary: Inline assembly getting clobbered in some case
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79149
--- Comment #14 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #13)
> (In reply to wilco from comment #12)
> > Does wp512 use 64-bit types? If so, this is likely PR77308.
>
> Yes, as seen in the attachment it uses lots
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #25 from Dominik Vogt ---
Looks better, but now we get this quite often:
--
==23722==ERROR: Your kernel seems to be vulnerable to CVE-2016-2143. Using
ASa\
n,
MSan, TSan, DFSan or LSan with such kernel can and will crash your
mach
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Senkevich ---
Hi,
are these intrinsics needed to be backported?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #26 from Dominik Vogt ---
(We cannot upgrade the kernel before end of this or beginning of next week.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The function says:
// 3.2.79+ is OK.
// 3.12.58+ is OK.
// Otherwise, bad.
// 4.1.21+ is OK.
// 4.4.6+ is OK.
// Otherwise, OK if 4.5+.
// Linux 5 and up are fine.
Perhaps it woul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The bug has been introduced in
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h?id=6252d702c5311ce916caf75ed82e5c8245171c92
so I assume kernels 2.6.24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #29 from Dominik Vogt ---
$ uname -s -r
Linux 4.2.0-20151029.0.65fcf15.5a12af1.fc20.s390xperformance
I'm quite sure we had a working kernel on that machine at some time because I
believe to remember that I'd been the first one who wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426
Bug ID: 79426
Summary: fortran - internal compiler error: in
fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2251
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Following patch adds the RHEL{6,7} errata kernels to the whitelist.
SUSE and/or Debian would need to add theirs if they want.
--- libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_s390.cc 2016-11-09
15:22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-03-29 00:00:00 |2017-2-8
--- Comment #38 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 47594, which changed state.
Bug 47594 Summary: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 execution test fails when
compiled with -O2 -fgraphite-identity at -m64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47594
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47594
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66944
Laurent Rineau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Laurent.Rineau__gcc@normale
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #7)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> > Created attachment 40662 [details]
> > Isolated graphite dump for miscompiled function
> >
> > As shown in the d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69458
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-02-05 00:00:00 |2017-2-8
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-03-15 00:00:00 |2017-2-8
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79425
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79425
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79423
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note translation happens by standard library support and might be hard to
control by a command line.
Does make, etc. Also translate their error messages too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79425
--- Comment #3 from Marina Minkin ---
What do you mean by "You need to set the section to verify correct in top level
inline-asm and then"?
This is a stripped code just to reproduce this behavior.
What I initially tried to do, was to make a func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79423
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79427
Bug ID: 79427
Summary: g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C fails starting with
r245249
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79423
--- Comment #3 from Søren Holm ---
Yes - it sound much like what I want.
The diagnostics stuff in gcc7 seem a bit overkill when the real issue is just
the translation of "error" and "warning"
A commandline flag that forcesg gcc to call setenv("
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41557
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79413
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
The typeof is not needed to trigger the ICE:
void fn1 ()
{
int a[1/0];
}
void fn2 ()
{
fn1();
}
But we create a DECL_EXPR for 'a' in finish_decl:
5098 add_stmt (build_stmt (DECL_SOURCE_LO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #55 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
And presumably other calls to get_simple_loop_desc need the more permissive
definition to re-enable loop unrolling. Ugh.
I think at the least we're going to have to look at each caller of
get_simple_loop_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60085
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79414
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60085
--- Comment #4 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Another variant (invalid) :
$ cat z1.c
void fn1 ()
{
void fnx ()
int n;
int a[n];
}
$ gcc-7-20170205 -c z1.c
z1.c: In function 'fnx':
z1.c:6:1: error: expected declaration specifiers before '}' to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79428
Bug ID: 79428
Summary: ICE in c_parser_consume_token, at c/c-parser.c:770
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79420
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79429
Bug ID: 79429
Summary: ICE in add_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:385
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430
Bug ID: 79430
Summary: [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly
optimised away
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79431
Bug ID: 79431
Summary: ICE in get, at cgraph.h:397
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79432
Bug ID: 79432
Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79387
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68972
--- Comment #12 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Wed Feb 8 17:33:57 2017
New Revision: 245280
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245280&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-02-08 Kelvin Nilsen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
What target is this on?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Pop ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> But then with different number of subscripts (and also likely different
> DR_BASE_OBJECT) you can't do anything with them and have to assume
> dependence. See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430
--- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> What target is this on?
We reproduced it under MAC OS X as well as under Ubuntu Linux 14.04 and
Scientific Linux 6.8. x86_64.
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
