[Bug c/79412] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2239

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79412 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug plugins/41820] cc1: error: Cannot load plugin ./selfassign.so

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41820 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/41817] bogus "may be uninitialized" (huge testcase, inlining?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41817 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/41744] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41744 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 41817, which changed state. Bug 41817 Summary: bogus "may be uninitialized" (huge testcase, inlining?) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41817 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/79412] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2239

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79412 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems the C FE on such redeclarations doesn't merge the decls (correct), but overwrites the type in pop_scope: 1345 I_SYMBOL_BINDING (b->id) = b->shadowed; 1346 if (b->shadow

[Bug c++/41727] [7 Regression] inner template specialization on non-type arg template causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41727 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug testsuite/41671] Unsatisfied symbol "__sync_fetch_and_add_4"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41671 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/41667] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/typedef1.C scan-assembler-times fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41667 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/41644] -minimal-toc not helping for toc section exceeding 64k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41644 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/41575] GCC lists private methods as candidates in "no matching function for call"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41575 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/79411] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption (fail_abnormal_edge_coalesce)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79411 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems it is reassoc1 that transforms: @@ -48,7 +69,6 @@ foo (struct C * x, const int * y, unsign ;; basic block 5, loop depth 0 ;;pred: 3 - _2 = d_1(ab) + 1; _3 = x_25(D)->c1; if (_3 !=

[Bug target/41557] gcc.exe: Internal error: (null) (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41557 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/79411] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption (fail_abnormal_edge_coalesce)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79411 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- There is just a single SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI check in tree-ssa-reassoc.c in the range handling code, I'd say that is significantly less than what really is needed. Unless we want to add code to be

[Bug preprocessor/41590] No __STDC__ definition in -g3 -E output on STDC_0_IN_SYSTEM_HEADERS systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41590 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation, patch CC|

[Bug c++/41596] handling of library-related options by g++spec.c causes a failure when generating pch.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41596 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/41671] Unsatisfied symbol "__sync_fetch_and_add_4"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41671 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79414] New: internal compiler error after "error: expected unqualified-id at end of input"

onfigured) ../gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-libmpx --prefix=/home/ejusjud/local/gcc-bin : (reconfigured) ../gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-libmpx --prefix=/home/ejusjud/local/gcc-bin Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.1 20170207 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c/41517] Unexpected behaviour of #pragma in statement context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41517 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/41373] attribute error and warning dont show the instantiation stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41373 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug pch/41346] Precompiled headers from stdin don't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41346 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/79415] New: -fcheck-pointer-bounds results in internal compiler error weakref attributes

jusjud/local/gcc-bin Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.1 20170207 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/79282] [7 Regresion] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon-for-64bits-1.c scan-assembler-times vshr 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79282 --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov --- Here is my analysis of the problem. The test was successful as LRA actually did not work for the test. LRA just checked that all insn constraints were satisfied. If LRA did any transformation, the test

[Bug c++/79410] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimplify_init_ctor_preeval, at gimplify.c:3489

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79410 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/79416] New: Internal compiler error for recursive template expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79416 Bug ID: 79416 Summary: Internal compiler error for recursive template expansion Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug rtl-optimization/64081] [5/6/7 Regression] r217827 prevents RTL loop unroll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081 --- Comment #53 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 40690 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40690&action=edit reduced testcase with rtl dumps and assembly Ughh, that was painful. The attached .tar.gz file has a reduced

[Bug target/68163] GCC on power8 does not issue the stxsspx instruction on power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68163 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 40691 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40691&action=edit Proposed patch to fix the problem. I believe this patch fixes the problem. Note, I am going on vacation, an

[Bug preprocessor/41540] -dM -E doesn't #define __FILE__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41540 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation, patch Status|U

[Bug middle-end/79399] GCC fails to compile big source at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79399 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 7 21:51:21 2017 New Revision: 245256 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245256&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/79399 * ira-int.h (struct target_ira_int):

[Bug tree-optimization/41339] Variables can occur multiple times in cfun->local_decls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41339 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/41272] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline2.c scan-assembler-times \(DIE \(.*?\) DW_TAG_in lined_subroutine 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41272 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/41203] -mtune=pentium2 structure related tree-outof-ssa internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41203 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug driver/41179] Documentation for "-fno-toplevel-reorder" is confusing (and wrong)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41179 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug fortran/79417] New: -Wconversion warns wrongly of real(16) to real(8)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79417 Bug ID: 79417 Summary: -Wconversion warns wrongly of real(16) to real(8) Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/41150] segmentation fault after using __attribute__((optimize()))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41150 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/21485] [5/6/7 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86/7 suck

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #62 f

[Bug c/41142] make implicit pointer conversions an error when sizeof(int) != sizeof(void *)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41142 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/70795] [7 Regression] gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:1948:1: ICE: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795 --- Comment #13 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-02-05, at 1:12 PM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > I would aprechiate if someone could bootstrap®test this > Index: cgraphunit.c > ==

[Bug middle-end/41098] We should be better in folding pow with integer powers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41098 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/79282] [7 Regresion] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon-for-64bits-1.c scan-assembler-times vshr 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79282 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #6) > I think changing pattern > > &r(1) = 0(2), r(3) > > to > > r(1) = 0(2), r(3) > > would be a right solution on the target side. The operand 1 can not >

[Bug c++/41091] Using section attribute in c and c++ function causes section type conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41091 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libffi/41014] Fix for libffi err_bad_abi test failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41014 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug testsuite/79418] New: ERROR: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-2.c -O0 : syntax error in targe t selector "target arm_hf_eabi || avr-*-* || riscv*-*-*" for "

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79418 Bug ID: 79418 Summary: ERROR: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-2.c -O0 : syntax error in targe t selector "target arm_hf_eabi || avr-*-* || riscv*-*-*" for " Produ

[Bug c++/79419] New: Explicit specialization of constrained member template: ICE in set_constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79419 Bug ID: 79419 Summary: Explicit specialization of constrained member template: ICE in set_constraints Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug middle-end/41001] alloca broken for -fno-builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41001 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/79419] Explicit specialization of constrained member template: ICE in set_constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79419 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug c++/79416] [4.5/5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error for recursive template expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79416 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|UN

[Bug c++/79420] New: ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:14573

/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.1/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.1 20170207 (experimental) [trunk revision

[Bug middle-end/79399] GCC fails to compile big source at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79399 --- Comment #11 from Dmitry Babokin --- With new patch it compiled successfully. It took 41G of memory and 5:25 hours to complete.

[Bug c++/79415] [6/7 Regression] -fcheck-pointer-bounds results in internal compiler error weakref attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79415 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug c++/79414] [7 Regression] internal compiler error after "error: expected unqualified-id at end of input"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79414 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79345] [6/7 Regression] passing yet-uninitialized member as argument to base class constructor should warn (-Wunitialized)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79345 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79314] friend function with qualified name definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79314 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/79418] ERROR: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-2.c -O0 : syntax error in targe t selector "target arm_hf_eabi || avr-*-* || riscv*-*-*" for "

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79418 Andrew Waterman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew at sifive dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c++/79301] With -Werror=pedantic outside C++17 mode, __has_cpp_attribute(fallthrough) is nonzero but [[fallthrough]] fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79301 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/41557] gcc.exe: Internal error: (null) (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41557 Andris Pavenis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/79399] GCC fails to compile big source at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79399 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

<    1   2