[Bug rtl-optimization/78580] [6 Regression] Segfault in gcc with multilib (-m32) and -ffixed-*

2017-01-29 Thread bunk at stusta dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78580 Adrian Bunk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bunk at stusta dot de --- Comment #8 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/78580] [6 Regression] Segfault in gcc with multilib (-m32) and -ffixed-*

2017-01-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78580 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/70696] [Coarray] ICE on EVENT POST of host-associated EVENT_TYPE coarray

2017-01-29 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696 --- Comment #13 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Jan 29 13:50:23 2017 New Revision: 245014 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245014&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-01-29 Andre Vehreschild Backport from trunk

[Bug fortran/70696] [Coarray] ICE on EVENT POST of host-associated EVENT_TYPE coarray

2017-01-29 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696 --- Comment #14 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Backported to gcc-6. Waiting one week for regressions before closing.

[Bug c++/79267] New: internal compiler error with -O3 or -O2 -finline-functions

2017-01-29 Thread g.chauvat at laposte dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79267 Bug ID: 79267 Summary: internal compiler error with -O3 or -O2 -finline-functions Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/70697] [Coarray] ICE on EVENT WAIT with array element UNTIL_COUNT argument

2017-01-29 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70697 --- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Jan 29 14:47:28 2017 New Revision: 245015 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245015&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2017-01-29 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug fortran/70697] [Coarray] ICE on EVENT WAIT with array element UNTIL_COUNT argument

2017-01-29 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70697 --- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Backported to gcc-6. Waiting on week for regression before closing.

[Bug fortran/68887] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/event_[12].f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic fails

2017-01-29 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887 --- Comment #15 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Jan 29 15:14:41 2017 New Revision: 245016 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245016&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libgfortran/ChangeLog: 2017-01-29 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug fortran/70696] [Coarray] ICE on EVENT POST of host-associated EVENT_TYPE coarray

2017-01-29 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696 --- Comment #15 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Sun Jan 29 15:14:41 2017 New Revision: 245016 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245016&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libgfortran/ChangeLog: 2017-01-29 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug c++/58798] class with a class reference member generates unjustified warning

2017-01-29 Thread steven.spark at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58798 Szikra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven.spark at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug c++/58798] class with a class reference member generates unjustified warning

2017-01-29 Thread steven.spark at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58798 --- Comment #2 from Szikra --- Created attachment 40615 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40615&action=edit preprocessed test case Compiled with g++ --save-temps -std=gnu++11 -fpack-struct eeprom.cpp -o eeprom eeprom.cpp: I

[Bug target/79268] New: [6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation for vec_xl and vec_xst intrinsics

2017-01-29 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79268 Bug ID: 79268 Summary: [6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation for vec_xl and vec_xst intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-

[Bug target/79268] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation for vec_xl and vec_xst intrinsics

2017-01-29 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79268 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58798] class with a class reference member generates unjustified warning

2017-01-29 Thread steven.spark at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58798 --- Comment #3 from Szikra --- The warning is still there if I use the -Wno-packed option: g++ -std=gnu++11 -fpack-struct -Wno-packed eeprom.cpp -o eeprom Why? I have found a suggestion to hide warning about ignored attributes: #pragma clang di

[Bug c/79269] New: Calculate size of struct with flexible array at compile time

2017-01-29 Thread mojo at world3 dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79269 Bug ID: 79269 Summary: Calculate size of struct with flexible array at compile time Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/79270] New: FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/at-property-23.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for excess errors)

2017-01-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79270 Bug ID: 79270 Summary: FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/at-property-23.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug target/53659] ARM: Using -mcpu=cortex-a9 option results in bad performance for Cortex-A9 processor in C-Ray phoronix benchmark

2017-01-29 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53659 --- Comment #9 from PeteVine --- @jgreenhalgh Please have a look at the profiled assembly for both fast and slow codegen. (attached) According to @aldyh's bisection in #68664 this probably isn't the same issue.

[Bug testsuite/79270] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/at-property-23.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for excess errors)

2017-01-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79270 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79230] [7 Regression] [OOP] Run time error: double free or corruption

2017-01-29 Thread vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug fortran/78958] FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_class_5.f03 - Segmentation fault

2017-01-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-hpux* Host|hpp

[Bug testsuite/79270] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/at-property-23.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for excess errors)

2017-01-29 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79270 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2017-01-29, at 1:48 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > On darwin this has been fixed by revision r244990. Maybe it's fixed then. Report was for revision 244960. -- John David Anglin

[Bug testsuite/79272] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/pr77653.c scan-ipa-dump icf "Not unifying; alias cannot be created; target is discardable"

2017-01-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79272 Bug ID: 79272 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/pr77653.c scan-ipa-dump icf "Not unifying; alias cannot be created; target is discardable" Product: gcc Version: 7.0

[Bug testsuite/79273] New: FAIL: c-c++-common/Wduplicated-branches-13.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)

2017-01-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79273 Bug ID: 79273 Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/Wduplicated-branches-13.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/79274] New: FAIL: g++.dg/tls/pr77285-2.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler _ZTH4var1B3tag

2017-01-29 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79274 Bug ID: 79274 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/tls/pr77285-2.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler _ZTH4var1B3tag Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/79269] Calculate size of struct with flexible array at compile time

2017-01-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79269 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/79269] Calculate size of struct with flexible array at compile time

2017-01-29 Thread mojo at world3 dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79269 --- Comment #2 from mojo at world3 dot net --- Thanks. __builtin_object_size() works well at runtime and solves me immediate need, which spurred me to suggest this enhancement. After giving it some thought I agree with you, I can't see any easy w

[Bug c++/58798] class with a class reference member generates unjustified warning

2017-01-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58798 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Szikra from comment #3) > The warning is still there if I use the -Wno-packed option: > g++ -std=gnu++11 -fpack-struct -Wno-packed eeprom.cpp -o eeprom > Why? Because the warning isn't contro

[Bug middle-end/79275] New: -Wformat-overflow false positive exceeding INT_MAX in glibc sysdeps/posix/tempname.c

2017-01-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79275 Bug ID: 79275 Summary: -Wformat-overflow false positive exceeding INT_MAX in glibc sysdeps/posix/tempname.c Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug middle-end/79275] -Wformat-overflow false positive exceeding INT_MAX in glibc sysdeps/posix/tempname.c

2017-01-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79275 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/79268] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation for vec_xl and vec_xst intrinsics

2017-01-29 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79268 --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon Jan 30 03:32:59 2017 New Revision: 245021 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245021&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-01-29 Bill Schmidt PR target/79268 * con

[Bug tree-optimization/79276] New: [7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in VRP pass

2017-01-29 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79276 Bug ID: 79276 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in VRP pass Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/79276] [7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in VRP pass

2017-01-29 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79276 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/79276] [7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in VRP pass

2017-01-29 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79276 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Probably started with Richi's r244974.