https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77745
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 26 08:16:37 2017
New Revision: 244918
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244918&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77745
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 26 08:16:37 2017
New Revision: 244918
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244918&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79237
Bug ID: 79237
Summary: ARMv7-M ICE in extract_constrain_insn, insn does not
satisfy its constraints
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 26 08:46:36 2017
New Revision: 244921
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244921&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70465
* reg-stack.c (emit_swap_insn): Instead o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Merge base r235033 (of trunk and 6 branch) with following patch (that I
installed couple weeks ago) works:
diff --git a/gcc/cp/lambda.c b/gcc/cp/lambda.c
index cdc11fe..9e5e044 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/lambda.c
++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C++ source code
extern char a[];
int b;
char c, e;
long d;
void fn1() { (0, b ? &c : a)[d] = e; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79237
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79237
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79237
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79235
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79238
Bug ID: 79238
Summary: Combine generates paradoxical subreg of memory
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: midd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79237
--- Comment #3 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi,
My outstanding patch for PR71607 fixes this ICE too. I am currently retesting
it after some comments upstream and should be posting a new version soon.
Cheers,
Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239
Bug ID: 79239
Summary: [7 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311
(error: unrecognizable insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What are the command line options and gcc configuration?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79238
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
Note: Reg 67 is
(set (reg:SI 67 [ *f_5(D) ])
(mem:SI (reg:DI 2 %r2 [ f ]) [1 *f_5(D)+0 S4 A32]))
Note 2: Combine tries
(parallel [
(set (reg/i:DI 2 %r2)
(zero_extract:DI (mem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239
--- Comment #2 from PeteVine ---
gcc -O2 or above elicits the ICE, configured with:
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --prefix=/usr/gcc7 --program-suffix=-7
--enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/gcc7/lib
--without-included-ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230
--- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Here is our full test suite:
http://www.desy.de/~reuter/whizard_gfortran-170126-1131.tar.gz
Just unpack, do make, then it will produce two binaries, rt_error and
rt_error2.
The first one has ca. 60 tests impl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79212
--- Comment #6 from davids at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: davids
Date: Thu Jan 26 10:41:35 2017
New Revision: 244922
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244922&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-26 David Sherwood
gcc/
PR middle-end/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697
--- Comment #19 from Václav Haisman ---
There appears to be some sort of interaction with the `inline` attribute of the
`get_ptd()` function. If the `get_ptd()` function is just declared `extern` in
`def.hxx` and defined in `def.cxx`, the link er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239
--- Comment #5 from PeteVine ---
Yes, this came from the gl4es project, and compiling the whole thing normally,
only gcc7 is affected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79236
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 26 11:05:03 2017
New Revision: 244924
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244924&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/79236
* omp-low.c (struct omp_context): Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 26 11:16:49 2017
New Revision: 244926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-26 Richard Biener
* tree-vrp.c (vrp_visit_assignme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79034
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 26 11:16:49 2017
New Revision: 244926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-26 Richard Biener
* tree-vrp.c (vrp_visit_assignmen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70435
Armin van der Togt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||armin at otheruse dot nl
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
Bug ID: 79240
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in s390_extzv_shift_ok, at
config/s390/s390.c:2475
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79199
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jan 26 11:37:33 2017
New Revision: 244928
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244928&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/79199
* fold-const.c (operand_equal_p) [COND_EXPR]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79199
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
Bug ID: 79241
Summary: error wen compiling -Os, OK with another optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79034
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78224
Bug 78224 depends on bug 79034, which changed state.
Bug 79034 Summary: [6 Regression] error: missing PHI def in verify_gimple_in_cfg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79034
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |7.0.1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
--- Comment #2 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru ---
90mbytes of code? you must be joking! But when I try to do a testcase with only
few files then all compiles OK. Moreover the classes which uses
FUNCTOR_BIND_MEMBER without additional "using na
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59970
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eyalroz at technion dot ac.il
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #20 from Aldy Hernandez
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Did you actually read it? You haven't provided any of this information:
the system type;
the options given when GCC was configured/built;
the complete command line that triggers the bug;
th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79179
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67273
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67273
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79237
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||headch at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79034
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 26 13:08:43 2017
New Revision: 244930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244930&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79236
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79212
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] internal |[6 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] Poor|[5/6 Regression] Poor code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This looks like a resurgence of PR 69245.
I suspect the arm FPU options internal overhaul triggered it (but I haven't
bisected it)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I wouldn't bother backporting. It's (IMHO) a low priority codesize regression
for 387 math, which virtually nobody cares about anymore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jan 26 14:30:45 2017
New Revision: 244933
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244933&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79190 add fallback aligned_alloc implementation
libstdc++-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78332
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71289
Kang-Che Sung changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Explorer09 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79242
Bug ID: 79242
Summary: ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6029
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Well, it's very hard to bisect that as r237621 fails with:
/suse/mliska/Programming/gcc/gcc/tree-vrp.c:1244:12: error: ‘inv2’ may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 40589
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40589&action=edit
aarch64 tree uninit dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Ok... I suppose simply papering over the issue(s) is the way to go then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
Yep, would be the easiest way. I'll prepare patches for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437
--- Comment #13 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Proposed fix at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01981.html
It prefers symbolic range if there is no useful numeric range information.
Though I believe it is the right thing to do, it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rearnsha at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79176
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 26 15:30:43 2017
New Revision: 244935
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244935&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79176 - lambda ICE with -flto -Os
* decl2.c (vague
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, either this is a bug in s390_extzv_shift_ok that is should use
s390_contiguous_bitmask_p (contig, true, bitsize, &start, &end);
instead of
s390_contiguous_bitmask_nowrap_p (contig, bitsize, &start, &end);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65482
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78320
--- Comment #1 from David Blaikie ---
ping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78321
--- Comment #1 from David Blaikie ---
ping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78322
--- Comment #3 from David Blaikie ---
ping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78265
--- Comment #3 from David Blaikie ---
ping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60246
--- Comment #1 from David Blaikie ---
ping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60815
--- Comment #3 from David Blaikie ---
ping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60833
--- Comment #2 from David Blaikie ---
ping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
--- Comment #4 from Dominik Vogt ---
> So, either this is a bug in s390_extzv_shift_ok that is should use
> s390_contiguous_bitmask_p (contig, true, bitsize, &start, &end);
> instead of
> s390_contiguous_bitmask_nowrap_p (contig, bitsize, &star
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Looking around, I see various spots that need cleanup:
sizeof (HOST_WIDE_INT) * BITS_PER_UNIT should be IMHO HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
1ULL in unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT contexts HOST_WIDE_INT_1U, 0ULL
HOST_WIDE_INT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76957
--- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to amker from comment #8)
> I will have a look. Thanks.
Tree dump is as below:
;; Function dsyr2k (dsyr2k, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=4135, cgraph_uid=0,
symbol_order=3)
dsyr2k (long int N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
--- Comment #6 from Dominik Vogt ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Looking around, I see various spots that need cleanup:
> sizeof (HOST_WIDE_INT) * BITS_PER_UNIT should be IMHO HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
> 1ULL in unsigned HOST_WIDE_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79176
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 26 16:34:03 2017
New Revision: 244937
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244937&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79176 - lambda ICE with -flto -Os
* decl2.c (vague
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79176
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79131
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Jan 26 17:08:12 2017
New Revision: 244942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-26 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/79131
* lr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71374
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
The problem is in that p88 does not conflict with a new reload pseudo created
to match p88 and the 3rd output (p91). They do not conflict as the reload
pseudo has the same value as p88.
So the solution i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79243
Bug ID: 79243
Summary: [7 Regression] Ambiguity with and
versioned namespaces
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79243
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79239
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Patch posted here
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg02073.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79244
Bug ID: 79244
Summary: ice in replace_uses_by, at tree-cfg.c:1866
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245
Bug ID: 79245
Summary: [7 Regression] Inefficient loop distribution to memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79245
--- Comment #1 from James Greenhalgh ---
Created attachment 40592
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40592&action=edit
Code generation for -Ofast -fomit-frame-pointer -mcpu=cortex-a72+crypto
-ftree-loop-distribute-patterns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79244
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79243
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jan 26 18:32:55 2017
New Revision: 244945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244945&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix namespace versioning and remove __detail::__identity helpers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65482
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
The -mallow-movmisalign option has always been a debug option. It was added in
the early power7 days. However, after benchmarking, we discovered that vectors
of 32-bit elements (i.e. vector int and vecto
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
