https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77450
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 08:06:29 2017
New Revision: 244853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77855
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 08:06:29 2017
New Revision: 244853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77605
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 08:06:29 2017
New Revision: 244853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78185
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 08:06:29 2017
New Revision: 244853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77436
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 08:06:29 2017
New Revision: 244853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77450
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78047
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 08:06:29 2017
New Revision: 244853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77605
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78333
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 08:06:29 2017
New Revision: 244853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78185
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78047
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78333
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165
>
> David Malcolm changed:
>
>What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79205
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79132
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Jan 24 08:48:36 2017
New Revision: 244857
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244857&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix false positive for -Walloc-size-larger-than (PR bootstrap/79132).
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79132
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79207
Bug ID: 79207
Summary: Special trigonometric simplification for solving
cubics with -ffast-math
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79198
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Does ggc_free handle destructors nicely? ISTR ggc got support for
destructors...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79199
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79201
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79205
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79205
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed.
Breakpoint 1, fancy_abort (
file=0x1e2fb90 "/space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-7-branch/gcc/gimple-expr.c",
line=473,
function=0x1e2fd73
"create_tmp_var") at
/space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79207
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79206
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, m.ostapenko at samsung dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79165
>
> Maxim Ostapenko changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79200
--- Comment #2 from tommapson at gmx dot de ---
Thanks, so the problem seems to depend on the linux kernel.
Linux wendy3 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u1 (2016-09-03) x86_64
GNU/Linux
doesn't have the problem, while
Linux heppo1 4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79200
--- Comment #3 from tommapson at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 40569
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40569&action=edit
Kernel-Config for realtime-kernel showing the bug
Used Kernel-Sources: 4.6.7
applied RT_PREEMPT-Patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79205
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So the bug is obviously **t, i.e. double indirection when only one should be
used.
The problem is that the D.2164 artificial variable (the "e" variable from
[dcl.decomp]) appears both in its own DECL_EXPR and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56727
--- Comment #9 from Yuri Gribov ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #8)
> Well, if my argument is correct, then GCC generates wrong code for the very
> first example in comment #0.
I believe it does (see my #5, most probly author of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79200
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Then you likely want to report it to kernel bugzilla or whomever provided the
RT_PREEMPT patch (if it can't be reproduced without that), not here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79123
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79123
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Jan 24 09:50:33 2017
New Revision: 244859
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244859&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/79123
* gimple-ssa-warn-alloca.c (alloca_ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79208
Bug ID: 79208
Summary: Typo in gcc/ipa-devirt.c:1631
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: translation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79205
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78945
--- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #2)
> A simple patch would be to check for __ARM_FEATURE_SAT in all those macros
> in exch_n.c along with HAVE_STREXB etc ..
__ARM_FEATURE_SIMD32 seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79198
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Jan 24 10:04:21 2017
New Revision: 244860
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244860&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR 79198] Call ipa-prop func summary destructor
2017-01-24 Martin Jam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79209
Bug ID: 79209
Summary: AArch64: Inconsistent packed volatile bitfield
accesses
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79198
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478
--- Comment #26 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jan 24 10:54:56 2017
New Revision: 244862
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244862&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78478
* config/ax_check_define.m4: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79208
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
The "s" is supposed to "merge" with a previously printed name to say
"bars definition" for the name 'bar'. I suppose that doesn't play well
with translation - is there anything that we should use instead?
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
Bug ID: 79210
Summary: "internal compiler error: in
get_substring_ranges_for_loc" processing
-Wformat-signedness warning
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |aarch64, x86_64-*-*
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79208
--- Comment #2 from Frederic Marchal ---
If the printed message is supposed to be concatenated with something else, then
there is another problem with every other messages printed by function
odr_types_equivalent_p()! All the messages I could see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77450
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79209
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
On x86_64 expansion is fine:
;; MEM[(volatile struct s0_t *)4B].y ={v} 1;
(insn 5 4 6 (set (reg/f:DI 89)
(const_int 4 [0x4])) "t.c":58 -1
(nil))
(insn 6 5 8 (set (reg:SI 90)
(mem/v/j:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71848
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 11:30:44 2017
New Revision: 244864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77648
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 11:30:44 2017
New Revision: 244864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78188
--- Comment #28 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 11:30:44 2017
New Revision: 244864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77879
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77879
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 11:30:44 2017
New Revision: 244864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59371
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77450
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77450
>
> Christophe Lyon changed:
>
>What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59371
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
Yes, versioning for niter analysis is something that came up elsewhere as well.
Note we likely want sth like the loop-vectorized builtin so we can record
that both are versions of each other (so we can scr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |7.0.1
--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-linux-gnu |aarch64-linux-gnu,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79211
Bug ID: 79211
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79211
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
--- Comment #28 from James Greenhalgh ---
> As far as I can tell the kernel is the only project where this issue ever
> popped up. The fix is straightforward. It just needs to be send to the
> correct kernel maintainer.
Right, but getting the pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79206
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 24 12:00:47 2017
New Revision: 244865
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244865&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79206 check string_view sizes in operator==
PR libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79206
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
input.c:1398 is:
gcc_assert (line_width >= (start.column - 1 + literal_length));
which was the one failing in PR 78569.
Could be due to a different root cause, though; I'll take a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47103
Göran Uddeborg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 47103, which changed state.
Bug 47103 Summary: i386 options have multi-line descriptions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47103
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Bug 40883 depends on bug 34352, which changed state.
Bug 34352 Summary: Multi-line descriptions are not picked up for translation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34352
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34352
Göran Uddeborg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> The recent 2nd bump on x86_64 is from
>
>
> r243995 | hubicka | 2017-01-01 16:40:29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79208
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79208
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 12:41:07 2017
New Revision: 244866
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244866&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
PR translation/79208
* ip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79208
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
--- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka ---
I will implement the "allow size growth when there is a hot bb on a path"
heuristics. We may try to get smarter on when the peeling actually helps the
unpeeled path, but that is bit hard to do because there m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79159
--- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Jan 24 13:09:27 2017
New Revision: 244868
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244868&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79159
* tree-ssa-loop-niter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68727
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46676
Göran Uddeborg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||goeran at uddeborg dot se
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Probably duplicate test-case for C++:
template class A
{
public:
operator bool ();
T *operator-> ();
template A m_fn1 ();
T *d;
};
class B
{
public:
typedef A Ptr;
};
template T constant_value (l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78363
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> I think I'd prefer the second hunk (but it needs to go omp-expand.c instead),
> guarded with if (!gimple_in_ssa_p (cfun)), so that it is really done only
> early
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77450
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 24 13:56:50 2017
New Revision: 244870
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244870&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-24 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78516
--- Comment #26 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
As of r244815 I don't see the ICE building glibc. 193 FAILs in gcc.sum,
60 in g++.sum, which is comparable to the results I reported with the LRA
patches. I don't get ICEs from either of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68727
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40572
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40572&action=edit
gcc7-pr68727.patch
Untested patch that implements the extra finish_offsetof argument.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78041
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78041
--- Comment #19 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wilco
Date: Tue Jan 24 14:14:12 2017
New Revision: 244872
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244872&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
With -fpu=neon DI mode shifts are expanded after reload. DI mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78041
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78363
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697
--- Comment #17 from Václav Haisman ---
This is still an issue in 2017 with GCC 5.4.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468
--- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez ---
The aarch64-linux-gnu regression originally reported for -mcpu=cortex-a53 was
caused by:
commit 08993ad1c669cab64baf352f79cd7f8584dd8e0c
Author: jgreenhalgh
Date: Thu Oct 1 09:33:40 2015 +
[Pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Since the culprit for the reported regression is aarch64 specific, I think we
should open an independent x86-64 PR (or an architecture independent PR if the
other reported problem by Richi is reproducible o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468
--- Comment #15 from James Greenhalgh ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #13)
> The aarch64-linux-gnu regression originally reported for -mcpu=cortex-a53
> was caused by:
>
> commit 08993ad1c669cab64baf352f79cd7f8584dd8e0c
> Author: jg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #57 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #55)
> nope, it needs back-porting to 6.x and 5.x - will do that after it's been on
> trunk a while.
Is backport to 5.x still planned?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
c#19 (WRT guality regressing) was for a different BZ. Sorry.
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo