https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #12)
> Created attachment 40525 [details]
> Untested fix 2.
>
> The patch I'm testing now.
DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION is streamed for all decls already:
if (CODE_CON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
Bug 62173 depends on bug 52563, which changed state.
Bug 52563 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times
optimized "&a" 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71237
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 17 08:24:26 2017
New Revision: 244519
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244519&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-17 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/52563
PR te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71237
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77737
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77737
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 17 08:24:26 2017
New Revision: 244519
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244519&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-17 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/52563
PR tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71237
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 17 08:24:26 2017
New Revision: 244519
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244519&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-17 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/52563
PR te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Created attachment 40524 [details]
> gcc7-pr78835.patch
>
> Untested patch that fixes the ICE on this testcase by marking directly
> called functions as needed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71433
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71433
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jan 17 08:38:59 2017
New Revision: 244520
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244520&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-17 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71433
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79106
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79104
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.3.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> > Created attachment 40524 [details]
> > gcc7-pr78835.patch
> >
> > Untested patch that fixes the ICE on this te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79102
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835
>
> --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78835
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40524|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #24 from Dominik Vogt ---
While you're at it ... does it have the same or a similar cause as the Avr bug?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78883
(A HImode quantity got allocated to r31+r32 (r31 is the last hardreg), in
pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
Yulia Koval changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vaalfreja at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79046
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 17 09:38:48 2017
New Revision: 244521
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244521&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/79046
* configure: Regenerated.
config/
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72488
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I've got a solid theory here. But it's too late to test and write up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78663
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Have you raised this with compiler-rt upstream already?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Tue Jan 17 10:09:47 2017
New Revision: 244525
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244525&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-17 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport from mainline
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Tue Jan 17 10:11:20 2017
New Revision: 244526
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244526&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-17 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport from mainline
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79112
Bug ID: 79112
Summary: [SH] libgo/go/exp/terminal/util.go:70:23: error:
integer constant overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
URL: https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79112
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
As far as I know GO has not been ported for SH.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78617
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.4.1, 6.3.1
Known to fail|5.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79112
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1)
> As far as I know GO has not been ported for SH.
Hmm, I thought gccgo would work on all gcc-supported targets. But it looks like
SH is indeed missing in t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79112
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #2)
>
> Hmm, I thought gccgo would work on all gcc-supported targets.
No, GO requires some runtime support which has to be provided by the backend.
For examp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79088
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
But note the threading in the testcase shouldn't by itself affect the
assumptions of loop 3 looking at the path and the shape of the CFG at the point
we do this analysis. So I think the logic we use is flaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70565
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79112
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78384
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79113
Bug ID: 79113
Summary: ICE inheriting a default constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437
--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, The input to IVOPT is different w/o the change:
Before r235817, it's like:
:
# i_153 = PHI <0(7), i_19(12)>
i.1_13 = (sizetype) i_153;
_14 = i.1_13 + 1;
_15 = _14 * 4;
_16 = pretmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78363
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think I'd prefer the second hunk (but it needs to go omp-expand.c instead),
guarded with if (!gimple_in_ssa_p (cfun)), so that it is really done only
early. It should likely be done in expand_omp_target to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79114
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79114
Bug ID: 79114
Summary: [6/7 Regression] std::throw_with_nested("string
literal") is rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79114
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is also rejected:
#include
void f() { }
int main() { std::throw_with_nested(f); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63746
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79115
Bug ID: 79115
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78768.c execution test on arm, aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79115
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm*, aarch64*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #14 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #12)
> > Created attachment 40525 [details]
> > Untested fix 2.
> >
> > The patch I'm testing now.
>
> DECL_SOURC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69600
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79115
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
The test is committing suicide, it should not be executed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Jan 17 12:49:41 2017
New Revision: 244528
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244528&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/77445
* tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (remove_ct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79105
--- Comment #1 from PeteVine ---
Updated to include an explicit -mfpu=neon-vfpv4.
http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1701179-TA-1701143TA49
Not sure if -mcpu=cortex-a5 and -mfpu=neon shouldn't have implied VFPv4 but the
explicit addition has f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79105
--- Comment #2 from PeteVine ---
$ gcc -v
Configured with: ../configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
--prefix=/usr/gcc7 --program-suffix=-7 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id
--libexecdir=/usr/gcc7/lib --without-included-gettext --e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78908
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79116
Bug ID: 79116
Summary: ICE on cilkplus array notation with a _Cilk_for
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79116
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
With the patch we only give up on some threading in thread4:
q.c.181t.thread4:FSM jump-thread path not considered: duplication of 5 insns is
needed and optimizing for size.
q.c.181t.thread4:FSM jump-thread pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
Note that the remaining missed threads loop exit condition test state !=
INVALID which after sequence of threads gets to probability 0 because original
guess from profile_estimate is not realistic.
I guess su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79091
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79091
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 40530
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40530&action=edit
further reduced testcase
this testcase compiles -- remove the 'q' tag from the enum to make it barf.
But the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79091
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78908
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71207
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Jan 17 15:11:00 2017
New Revision: 244530
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244530&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix wrong assumption in contains_type_p (PR ipa/71207).
2017-01-17 Marti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71207
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] gcc 5.3 |[5/6 Regression] gcc 5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71497
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79114
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 17 15:26:06 2017
New Revision: 244531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244531&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR79114 use decayed type in std::throw_with_nested assertion
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79116
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Jan 17 15:27:18 2017
New Revision: 244533
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244533&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/79116
* array-notation-common.c (cilkplus_extract_an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79116
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78908
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
struct A { int a : 1; };
struct F { int foo (A const &); };
template struct O : F { int foo (A const &); };
struct S {} b;
template int operator<< (L, T) { return (T) 123; }
template struct V;
template <>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79117
Bug ID: 79117
Summary: __builtin_isfinite edge case incorrect on 32 bit
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 17 15:26:11 2017
New Revision: 244532
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244532&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR69699 document why __GLIBCXX__ macro is useless
PR libstdc++/6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71854
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This has been fixed with r244218. I'll commit the testcase and close this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Am still seeing "random" truncation, even with the DejaGnu patch in comment #4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71854
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 17 15:50:24 2017
New Revision: 244534
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244534&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71854
* gcc.dg/vect/pr71854.c: New te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #25 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Jan 17 16:11:55 2017
New Revision: 244535
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244535&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-17 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/79058
* i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437
--- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think it's not PRE's fault. The input to PRE is already sub-optimal to be
handled.
Look at the source code:
for( i = 0 ; i < ( I - 1 ) ; i++ )
{
if( ( L < pL[i+1] ) &
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #26 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #24)
> While you're at it ... does it have the same or a similar cause as the Avr
> bug?
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78883
>
> (A HImode quantity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79106
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #27 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #26)
> (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #24)
> > While you're at it ... does it have the same or a similar cause as the Avr
> > bug?
> > https://gcc.gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437
--- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to amker from comment #7)
> I think it's not PRE's fault. The input to PRE is already sub-optimal to be
> handled.
> Look at the source code:
>
> for( i = 0 ; i < ( I - 1 ) ; i++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71497
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jan 17 16:33:44 2017
New Revision: 244536
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244536&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix wording of -Wmisleading-indentation (PR c++/71497)
gcc/c-family/Ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79117
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
You can use __builtin_isinf here, so:
if (__builtin_isinf(c)) {
puts("finite");
}
else {
puts("not finite");
}
The expansion of __builtin_isinf performs value truncation automa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79115
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Jan 17 16:36:55 2017
New Revision: 244537
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244537&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/79115 - FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78768.c execution test on arm, aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #28 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #27)
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #26)
> > (In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #24)
> > > While you're at it ... does it have the same or a si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79115
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79117
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
If you use -fexcess-precision=standard, the classification built-in
functions should convert values with excess range and precision to their
semantic types as required by ISO C (see c-typec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5)
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, joel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > I.e., the bug was enabling unintended soft-fp usage of XFmode at the same
> > time as enabling usage of TFmode. The TFmode functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70565
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Jan 17 16:54:55 2017
New Revision: 244538
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244538&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70565
* cp-array-notation.c (expand_array_notation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70565
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE at |[5/6 Regression] ICE at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79079
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 17 16:56:30 2017
New Revision: 244539
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244539&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79079
* internal-fn.c (expand_mul_overflow): Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78384
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Any progress with this?
It fell through the cracks over christmas vacation, I'll get to it this week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79118
Bug ID: 79118
Summary: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_bit_field_ref, at
cp/constexpr.c:2258
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78478
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #7)
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, joel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > > I.e., the bug was enabling unintended soft-fp usage of XFmode at the same
> > > time as enab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jan 17 17:03:00 2017
New Revision: 244540
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244540&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/76731
* config/i386/avx512fintrin.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79118
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
