[Bug ipa/78365] [7 Regression] ICE in determine_value_range, at tree-ssa-loo p-niter.c:413

2017-01-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11) > (In reply to Andrew Senkevich from comment #10) > > This commit breaks 5 SPEC CPU 2006 benchmarks (416.gamess, 454.calculix, > > 459.GemsFDTD, 465.tonto, 481.wr

[Bug ipa/78365] [7 Regression] ICE in determine_value_range, at tree-ssa-loo p-niter.c:413

2017-01-16 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11) > Looks like a GC issue as I was reducing the code but removing the comments > and empty lines caused the testcase to no longer crash. Adding --param > ggc-min-e

[Bug target/79080] [7 Regression] ICE: internal consistency failure (error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn) (error: shared rtx)

2017-01-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79080 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 16 21:34:35 2017 New Revision: 244506 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244506&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/79080 * loop-doloop.c (doloop_modify): Call unsh

[Bug middle-end/79089] [7 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

2017-01-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79089 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 16 21:35:30 2017 New Revision: 244507 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244507&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/79089 * gimplify.c (gimplify_init_constructor): If wa

[Bug ipa/79108] [7 Regression] ICE on some fortran code with -flto -Ofast

2017-01-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79108 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note "--param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0" is required to reproduce the issue. Otherwise it passes.

[Bug target/79080] [7 Regression] ICE: internal consistency failure (error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn) (error: shared rtx)

2017-01-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79080 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/79089] [7 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

2017-01-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79089 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/49726] [5/6 Regression] -g0 file.S -g does not produce debug info

2017-01-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49726 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] -g0 |[5/6 Regression] -g0 file.S

[Bug ipa/79108] [7 Regression] ICE on some fortran code with -flto -Ofast

2017-01-16 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79108 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57042] Strange typespec with -fdump-parse-tree

2017-01-16 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE/Segfault with |Strange typespec with

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

2017-01-16 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 --- Comment #28 from Jan Hubicka --- > On SPEC2000 the latest changes look good, compared to the old predictor gap > improved by 10% and INT/FP by 0.8%/0.6%. I'll run SPEC2006 tonight. It is rather surprising you are seeing such large changes fo

[Bug fortran/79107] ICE on name resolution within internal subroutine

2017-01-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79107 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/33562] [5/6 Regression] aggregate DSE disabled

2017-01-16 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33562 --- Comment #32 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Jan 16 23:43:05 2017 New Revision: 244509 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244509&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-01-16 Jeff Law PR tree-optimization/79090 PR tree

[Bug middle-end/61912] Missed (partial) dead store elimination for structures on GIMPLE

2017-01-16 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61912 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Jan 16 23:43:05 2017 New Revision: 244509 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244509&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-01-16 Jeff Law PR tree-optimization/79090 PR tree-

[Bug tree-optimization/77485] Missed dead store elimination of aggregate store followed by partial stores

2017-01-16 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485 --- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Jan 16 23:43:05 2017 New Revision: 244509 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244509&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-01-16 Jeff Law PR tree-optimization/79090 PR tree

[Bug tree-optimization/79090] [7 regression] DSE wrongly removes store at variable offset

2017-01-16 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79090 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Jan 16 23:43:05 2017 New Revision: 244509 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244509&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-01-16 Jeff Law PR tree-optimization/79090 PR tree-

[Bug bootstrap/78880] [7 Regression] Revision 243196 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-w64-mingw32

2017-01-16 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78880 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79095] [7 regression] spurious stringop-overflow warning

2017-01-16 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79095 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79095] [7 regression] spurious stringop-overflow warning

2017-01-16 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79095 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug tree-optimization/78608] [7 Regression] gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:570:17: runtime error: negation of -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

2017-01-16 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jan 17 00:14:52 2017 New Revision: 244511 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244511&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/78608 - gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:570:17: runtime error: n

[Bug tree-optimization/78608] [7 Regression] gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:570:17: runtime error: negation of -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

2017-01-16 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78703] -fprintf-return-value floating point handling incorrect in locales with a mulltibyte decimal point

2017-01-16 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78703 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug c/79109] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-4.c (test for excess errors)

2017-01-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79109 Bug ID: 79109 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-4.c (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

2017-01-16 Thread wdijkstr at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 --- Comment #29 from Wilco --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #28) > > On SPEC2000 the latest changes look good, compared to the old predictor gap > > improved by 10% and INT/FP by 0.8%/0.6%. I'll run SPEC2006 tonight. > > It is rather su

[Bug c/79110] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/format/pr78304.c (test for warnings, line 9)

2017-01-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79110 Bug ID: 79110 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/format/pr78304.c (test for warnings, line 9) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

2017-01-16 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 --- Comment #30 from Jan Hubicka --- > > When I looked at gap at the time, the main change was the reordering of a few > if statements in several hot functions. Incorrect block frequencies also > change > register allocation in a bad way, but I

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

2017-01-16 Thread wdijkstr at arm dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 --- Comment #31 from Wilco --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #30) > > > > When I looked at gap at the time, the main change was the reordering of a > > few > > if statements in several hot functions. Incorrect block frequencies also >

[Bug regression/53203] [5/6/7 Regression]: gcc.dg/setjmp-1.c

2017-01-16 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53203 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug demangler/79111] New: demangle_template tries to allocate 18446744070799748648 bytes

2017-01-16 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79111 Bug ID: 79111 Summary: demangle_template tries to allocate 18446744070799748648 bytes Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/77445] [7 Regression] Performance drop after r239219 on coremark test

2017-01-16 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 40526 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40526&action=edit Patch I am testing The profile is quite inconsistent since thread1. The problem is that duplicate_thread_path do

[Bug preprocessor/79106] wrong source line printed in diagnostics for a translation unit

2017-01-16 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79106 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/79066] [7 Regression] non-PIC code generated for powerpc glibc with -fpic

2017-01-16 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79066 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Jan 17 02:54:11 2017 New Revision: 244515 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244515&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR79066, non-PIC code generated for powerpc glibc with -fpic PR tar

[Bug target/79066] [7 Regression] non-PIC code generated for powerpc glibc with -fpic

2017-01-16 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79066 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78633] [7 Regression] [SH] libgcc/fp-bit.c:944:1: error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn

2017-01-16 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633 --- Comment #19 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Author: kkojima Date: Tue Jan 17 04:07:51 2017 New Revision: 244516 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244516&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/78633 * config/sh/sh.md (cmpeqsi_t+1): Call

[Bug target/78633] [7 Regression] [SH] libgcc/fp-bit.c:944:1: error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn

2017-01-16 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633 --- Comment #20 from Kazumoto Kojima --- I've applied a quick fix. I'd like to keep this open for further checks.

<    1   2