https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64767
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jan 4 21:47:04 2017
New Revision: 244076
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244076&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64767
* c.opt (Wpointer-compare): New option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64767
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78991
--- Comment #2 from Tobias ---
Thanks. The evidence you collected shows quite clear, that it probably is a
problem with clang.
So I now posted it here: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31537
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78991
Tobias changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78994
Bug ID: 78994
Summary: -Ofast makes aarch64 C++ benchmark slower
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78994
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://github.com/supercur |
|io/dsp-bench-cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78994
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-Ofast makes aarch64 C++|-Ofast makes aarch64 C++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60685
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at redhat dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78989
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Isn't there a dup somewhere? I Know this was filed before.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||77513
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #10)
> Since that's not a MEM_P, the expression isn't removed from antic/transp
> which makes it subject to hoisting across the abnormal edge.
>
> This could be easi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I'm mostly concerned about other places where we assume that a memory reference
is supposed to show up at the toplevel of a source/dest.
For example, it looks like we don't properly handle the case where w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78994
--- Comment #3 from PeteVine ---
Hey, that works for me too! (62565 vs 70758 in favour of -Ofast). Usefully
strange :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So I see a case in postreload-gcse.c where we might mis-handle when the
destination is a ZERO_EXTRACT or STRICT_LOW_PART. Neither happen often which
is probably why we've never noticed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78993
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78993
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.1.0, 5.3.0, 6.2.0, 7.0
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78993
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
# i_5 = PHI
# j_27 = PHI
# prephitmp_7 = PHI <0(3), prephitmp_17(4)>
_14 = i_5 > 9;
_18 = prephitmp_7 | _14;
if (_18 != 0)
goto ; [44.99%]
else
goto ; [55.01%]
Most likely conditiona
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32415
bruno at clisp dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jan 5 00:43:53 2017
New Revision: 244084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-01-04 Michael Meissner
PR target/71977
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71977
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jan 5 00:43:53 2017
New Revision: 244084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-01-04 Michael Meissner
PR target/71977
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78823
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jan 5 00:43:53 2017
New Revision: 244084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-01-04 Michael Meissner
PR target/71977
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78995
Bug ID: 78995
Summary: A strange copy error caused by O3 optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78996
Bug ID: 78996
Summary: uses macro as name
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78996
--- Comment #1 from W E Brown ---
Created attachment 40465
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40465&action=edit
Preprocessed source
: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20170104 (experimental) [trunk revision 244072] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c
$ gcc-6.2 -O3 small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
small.c: In function ‘foo’:
small.c:7:6: error: the first argument of a VEC_COND_EXPR must be of a boolean
vector type of the same number of elements
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78997
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78988
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78948
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64767
--- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager ---
Thank you for adding this!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78987
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78996
--- Comment #2 from Tim Shen ---
Author: timshen
Date: Thu Jan 5 03:18:17 2017
New Revision: 244092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244092&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-05 Tim Shen
PR libstdc++/78996
* include/std/vari
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78996
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78998
Bug ID: 78998
Summary: missing -Wnonnull for an unconditional call to strlen
with a null argument
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78998
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #46
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78914
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78999
Bug ID: 78999
Summary: problem with gcc on cygwin??? cygwin 2.6.1 with gcc
5.4.0
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79000
Bug ID: 79000
Summary: ICE: in gen_member_die, at dwarf2out.c:23995
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: lto
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78812
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Jan 5 07:38:48 2017
New Revision: 244093
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244093&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimizatin/78812
* rtl.h (contains_mem_rtx_p): Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78995
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
