https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78976
--- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Jan 4 08:06:54 2017
New Revision: 244048
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244048&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 78796 Modify testcases due to gfc_trans_string_copy change
As r244011 h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78796
--- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Jan 4 08:06:54 2017
New Revision: 244048
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244048&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 78796 Modify testcases due to gfc_trans_string_copy change
As r244011
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534
--- Comment #17 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Jan 4 08:06:54 2017
New Revision: 244048
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244048&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 78796 Modify testcases due to gfc_trans_string_copy change
As r244011
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77569
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78972
--- Comment #8 from Andrew M. ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> One thing to try is -fno-tree-ter.
Stack sizes for -fno-tree-ter:
4.9.4: 272 bytes
5.1-5.4: 288 bytes
6.1-6.3: 560 bytes
7: 560 bytes
Performance improves a lot wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59124
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78984
Bug ID: 78984
Summary: [4.9 regression] bootstrap fails while creating 32-bit
libgcc on 64-bit x86_64-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78895
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Duplicate of PR71055 (missed backport of a latent bug).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78984
--- Comment #1 from bruno at clisp dot org ---
The error is similar to the one in bug #63507. The differences are:
- I'm not using the '--with-build-config=bootstrap-asan' option.
- It fails building the "," directory of libgcc, not the "32" direc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78984
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Not a bug. You are trying to use a 64bit ld with a ld plugin that is just
compiled as 32bit. You need to use the 32bit ld here too. Try using a chroot
env rather than the hack you are doing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78984
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 4 09:07:33 2017
New Revision: 244050
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244050&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71563
* match.pd: Simplify X << Y in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, eggert at gnu dot org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685
>
> --- Comment #5 from Paul Eggert ---
> Just to clarify: 'main' (in the sample program) i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78978
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> If the libstdc++ approach works and is acceptable, it seems to me we should do
> the same for libgo.
Fine with me: it has the advantage of s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78938
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78938
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78976
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65206
>
> --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Adding some flag on the MASK_STORE or MASK_LO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78938
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> I believe the bool patterns were supposed to handle this case but
> at the time I fixed its time/size complexity issues we IIRC ended up
> effectively disabli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78974
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76957
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78938
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78938
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 4 10:54:59 2017
New Revision: 244051
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244051&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Support exception propagation without lock-free atomic int
2017-01-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78979
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> The Solaris header would be more correct if it did:
>
> #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 201112L && __cplusplus < 201402L
> extern char *gets(char *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71055
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 4 12:35:32 2017
New Revision: 244053
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244053&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-04 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78977
--- Comment #6 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> (In reply to Hannes Hauswedell from comment #3)
> >
> > Great, let me know if it's merged, then I will try a newer snapshot!
>
> The patch has been committed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78880
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78641
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78908
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78977
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Hannes Hauswedell from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Hannes Hauswedell from comment #3)
> > >
> > > Great, let me know if it's merged, then I will try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78911
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78589
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71237
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78977
--- Comment #8 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> (In reply to Hannes Hauswedell from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to Hannes Hauswedell from comment #3)
> > > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78968
--- Comment #12 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
Created attachment 40451
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40451&action=edit
intermediate for O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78968
--- Comment #13 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
Created attachment 40452
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40452&action=edit
intermediate for O3 -fno-printf-return-value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78968
--- Comment #14 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
sorry, please ignore the attachments, bugzilla dropped me in a different issue
than planned.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78977
--- Comment #9 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
Created attachment 40453
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40453&action=edit
intermediate for O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78977
--- Comment #10 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
Created attachment 40454
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40454&action=edit
intermediate for O3 -fno-printf-return-value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985
Bug ID: 78985
Summary: [7 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure by
-Wuninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build, diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78970
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, basic problem is in _cpp_save_file_entries, where we calculate md5sum of
all inputs files. Providing '-' will cause to have input file as fd == 0 and
ff = fdopen (f->fd, "rb");
md5_str
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78970
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 40455
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40455&action=edit
Untested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78970
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 40456
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40456&action=edit
Untested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57507
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66735
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 66735, which changed state.
Bug 66735 Summary: [C++14] lambda init-capture fails for const references
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66735
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66735
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Jan 4 15:23:40 2017
New Revision: 244056
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244056&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/66735
* cp-tree.h (DECLTYPE_FOR_REF_C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78932
--- Comment #2 from xqr4n54r1 at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 40457
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40457&action=edit
memcpy instead of get_unaligned_be
* I wrote memcpy instead of get_unaligned_be{16|32} and I saw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78968
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 4 15:41:19 2017
New Revision: 244057
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244057&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78968 add configure check for __cxa_thread_atexit in libc
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78968
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Trunk no longer defines __cxa_thread_atexit if it's found in libc. We might
want to backport this to the gcc-5-branch and gcc-6-branch.
I will try to test this in a FreeBSD 11 VM some time soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78986
Bug ID: 78986
Summary: template inner classes are not affected by visibility
specifiers
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78987
Bug ID: 78987
Summary: Wrong location of a binary expression for -Waddress
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78988
Bug ID: 78988
Summary: Wrong location of a binary expression for -Waddress
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78987
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
C++ related issue: PR78988.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78984
--- Comment #5 from bruno at clisp dot org ---
Thanks Jakub. The ld --version and "-m elf_i386 -L /usr/lib/" trick solves it!
(I was already using the "as --32" trick.)
Another way is to define a simpler ld32 script
== ld32 ==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #9)
> Sounds good. I can give it a try in the following days or weeks and see if I
> can get a C code with such large switch statements compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78984
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
Note that if you use --with-ld, -B no longer works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78899
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40403|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78977
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
Thanks. The preprocessed file is what we need. I see two snprintf calls being
optimized in the SEQAN_TEST_test_random_beta_write function:
On line 52569 substituting 3 for snprintf return value (output c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78989
Bug ID: 78989
Summary: Missing -Waddress warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77545
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77284
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jan 4 17:47:04 2017
New Revision: 244062
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244062&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77545
PR c++/77284
* constexpr.c (potent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77545
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jan 4 17:47:04 2017
New Revision: 244062
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244062&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77545
PR c++/77284
* constexpr.c (potent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77284
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE on |[5/6 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77545
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78984
--- Comment #7 from bruno at clisp dot org ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #6)
> Note that if you use --with-ld, -B no longer works.
Thanks Andreas.
In fact, I've never used the -B option (except during gcc bootstrap).
Some 20 years a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78990
Bug ID: 78990
Summary: ICE when assigning polymorphic array function result
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78984
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
The binutils testsuite depends on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #6)
> I haven't thought through the implementation challenges but defining the
> extended -Wunused-but-set-variabl rule that's being suggested here seems
> straightforwa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67955
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Jan 4 19:22:44 2017
New Revision: 244067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimizatin/67955
* tree-ssa-alias.c (same_addr_si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78989
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Looking at the PRs you filed about the locations (PR78987 and PR78988), perhaps
the best approach here is for the location of the warning to be either this:
return (asan_poison_variables &&
~~~
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78989
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
...or to use a rich location to send two locations for the warning, giving:
return (asan_poison_variables &&
^~
# 6 "gimplify.cpp" 3 4
__null
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78056
--- Comment #20 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Wed Jan 4 20:03:00 2017
New Revision: 244068
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244068&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-01-04 Kelvin Nilsen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78900
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Fixed in trunk in subversion id 244044. I will hold the bug open until it is
checked into the GCC 6 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78953
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 4 20:05:14 2017
New Revision: 244070
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244070&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71182
* parser.c (cp_lexer_previous_token): Use vec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] parser.c |[6 Regression] parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78957
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 4 20:25:13 2017
New Revision: 244072
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244072&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR driver/78957
* c.opt (fsso-struct=): Add RejectNegative
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78957
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78991
Bug ID: 78991
Summary: std::sort and std::unique can not use std::function
with clang++ -std=c++14
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116
--- Comment #10 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Any progress on this?
Besides waiting for pr77536 to be fixed, I'm not sure what specifically can be
done on this issue to fix the problem. I personally have not d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78992
Bug ID: 78992
Summary: Incorrect sigaction definition on 32-bit sparc
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sani
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78693
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 4 21:30:35 2017
New Revision: 244074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244074&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78693
* parser.c (cp_parser_simple_declaration): On
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78949
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 4 21:34:27 2017
New Revision: 244075
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244075&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78949
* typeck.c (cp_build_unary_op): Call mark_rva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78993
Bug ID: 78993
Summary: False positive from -Wmaybe-uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78693
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Bogus |[6 Regression] Bogus
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78949
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78993
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 40462
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40462&action=edit
Gimple dump from when warning is emitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78991
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
How positive you are that this is a libstdc++ bug rather than a clang bug? It
works correctly with GCC 5.4.0's front-end and GCC 7.0's libstdc++ and
front-end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78910
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
