[Bug fortran/78881] [F03] reading from string with DTIO procedure does not work properly

2016-12-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78926] New: Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread d.v.a at ngs dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 Bug ID: 78926 Summary: Build fails after update to GCC 6.3 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread d.v.a at ngs dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 __vic changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.2.0 Host|

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- How are the other objects built?

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread d.v.a at ngs dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #3 from __vic --- See the first $. Or you mean openssl objects?

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- I mean the openssl libraries.

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread d.v.a at ngs dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #5 from __vic --- $ gcc -flto -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -I. -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -Wa,--noexecstack -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -O3 -Wall -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to __vic from comment #1) > Why I see messages about lto-wrapper if LTO isn't used? It's debug build w/o > LTO. Because openssl is compiled with lto. Maybe something is wrong in the way openssl is

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread d.v.a at ngs dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #7 from __vic --- But it works with 6.2

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread d.v.a at ngs dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #8 from __vic --- OpenSSL v 1.0.2j $ env CC="gcc -flto -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections" AR=gcc-ar RANLIB=gcc-ranlib ./config threads no-shared

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread d.v.a at ngs dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #9 from __vic --- $ ld --version GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.27) 1.12 Built from sources. Both gold and BFD produce the same result

[Bug c/78927] New: implicit-fallthrough is very picky about FALLTHROUGH comment location

2016-12-25 Thread coypu at sdf dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78927 Bug ID: 78927 Summary: implicit-fallthrough is very picky about FALLTHROUGH comment location Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/78927] implicit-fallthrough is very picky about FALLTHROUGH comment location

2016-12-25 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78927 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- Is openssl compiled with 6.2 while the program is compiled with 6.3?

[Bug c++/78928] New: void(*); accepted in block scope

2016-12-25 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78928 Bug ID: 78928 Summary: void(*); accepted in block scope Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/78929] New: Incorrect implementation of Refining Expression Evaluation Order for Idiomatic C++

2016-12-25 Thread boostcpp at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78929 Bug ID: 78929 Summary: Incorrect implementation of Refining Expression Evaluation Order for Idiomatic C++ Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/78929] Incorrect implementation of Refining Expression Evaluation Order for Idiomatic C++

2016-12-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78929 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm. I don't think this is still defined according to that paper. * Postfix expressions are evaluated from left to right. This includes functions calls and member selection expressions. * Assignment express

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread d.v.a at ngs dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #11 from __vic --- Yes. As it is said in Comment 0: > OpenSSL library (static) built with previous version - GCC 6.2.

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread d.v.a at ngs dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #12 from __vic --- Actually it can be 6.1 as well. Don't remember exactly.

[Bug target/78926] Build fails after update to GCC 6.3

2016-12-25 Thread d.v.a at ngs dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 --- Comment #13 from __vic --- Rebuilt openssl with 6.3, the problem has gone. What was that? Bug in the previous version or in the new one?