[Bug fortran/78848] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment

[Bug fortran/78848] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry, actually the example in comment 3 only ICEs if the type-binding of the DTIO is commented out: module m type :: t integer :: i contains ! procedure :: wf ! generic :: write(fo

[Bug fortran/78848] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- BTW, I suspect the ICE might be a regression introduced by r243609 (my fix for PR 78737).

[Bug fortran/78848] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/78848] [7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[OOP] ICE on writing CLASS |[7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on

[Bug fortran/78848] [7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78848] [7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 40361 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40361&action=edit patch The attached patch implements what I think needs to happen (and regtests cleanly).

[Bug fortran/78592] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_specific_dtio_proc, at fortran/interface.c:4939

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78592 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sun Dec 18 11:03:41 2016 New Revision: 243783 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243783&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-12-18 Janus Weil PR fortran/78592 * int

[Bug c++/78749] [7 Regression] bogus warning for friend member function in anonymous namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- The patch looks good to me. Would you mind posting it to the list? Thanks.

[Bug fortran/78848] [7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sun Dec 18 13:22:13 2016 New Revision: 243784 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243784&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-12-18 Janus Weil PR fortran/78848 * tra

[Bug c++/78850] New: Parameter of returned generic lambda allegedly shadows parameter of free function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78850 Bug ID: 78850 Summary: Parameter of returned generic lambda allegedly shadows parameter of free function Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug c++/69681] C/C++ FEs do not consider comparisons of distinct function pointers to be constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/78848] [7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #4) > Sorry, actually the example in comment 3 only ICEs if the type-binding of > the DTIO is commented out: > > module m > type :: t > integer :: i

[Bug fortran/65045] [5 Regression] [F08] ICE when using the same name for a block and a variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65045 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78848] [7 Regression] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug libstdc++/78851] New: Resolve DR 550 in cmath and continue using __builtin_powil() even in C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78851 Bug ID: 78851 Summary: Resolve DR 550 in cmath and continue using __builtin_powil() even in C++11 Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug target/60028] TIC6X: B3 register (return address) is saved on stack when real call is replaced with sibling call in a leaf function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60028 --- Comment #2 from Wojciech Migda --- Still visible with gcc 5.4.1 and 6.2.1

[Bug ada/78845] Inverse (Real_Matrix) result has wrong bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78845 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin15 | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/78545] Possible correction to online LTIME documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78545 --- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sun Dec 18 18:03:36 2016 New Revision: 243785 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243785&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-12-18 Dominique d'Humieres PR fortran/78545

[Bug c++/78852] New: ICE with Boost.Variant 1.62

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78852 Bug ID: 78852 Summary: ICE with Boost.Variant 1.62 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug target/57583] large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson --- Created attachment 40362 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40362&action=edit patch adding -mlong-jump-table-offsets option for m68k This is the crude patch I mentioned in an older comm

[Bug c++/78852] ICE with Boost.Variant 1.62

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78852 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

Problem with Factory Generated code g++ 4.x, 5.x, 6.x

Hi, I hope you are fine. I wish to report a problem with g++ 4.x, g++ 5.x, g++ 6.x. I'm trying to implement a very classic Factory Method Pattern in C++, I can do it very easily in MS-Visual C++, but in Linux with g++ the code compiles but I get a segmentation fault when I run it. The code is v

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid --- Comment #9 f

[Bug libstdc++/78851] Resolve DR 550 in cmath and continue using __builtin_powil() even in C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78851 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- You are misinterpreting Howard's answer. Please show code that currently doesn't compile and you would like to be able to compile, or code that compiles (specify the flags used) to asm that isn't as fast as you

[Bug target/78567] [7 Regression] GCC trunk fails to compile all-stage2-gcc in i386.c with x32 enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78567 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, diagnostic Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/78608] [7 Regression] gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:570:17: runtime error: negation of -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/78665] Unexpected warning about "assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying conditional"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78665 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78385] Build of libgcc2 for target arm-eabi fails, if configuration --with-abi=apcs-gnu is used (in GCC-Build)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78385 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |target --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) > I think this needs to be reopened. As mentioned in comment 0, the original > test case in itself is valid, but is invalidated by adding an I/O statement > that reference

[Bug c/78853] New: aligned reads/writes (vmovdqa) emitted when no such guarantee can be made

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78853 Bug ID: 78853 Summary: aligned reads/writes (vmovdqa) emitted when no such guarantee can be made Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78659] [F03] Spurious "requires DTIO" reported against namelist statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78659 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #10) > Agree, I will look further Janus, unless you are digging into it already? I'm currently looking into PR 78661. Would be great if you could take care

[Bug target/78853] aligned reads/writes (vmovdqa) emitted when no such guarantee can be made

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78853 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- IIRC __m512i, __m256i, and __m128i all have alignment requirements which is why you are getting this code. I think your code does not check for alignment which is broken.

[Bug fortran/78854] New: [F03] DTIO namelist output not working on internal unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78854 Bug ID: 78854 Summary: [F03] DTIO namelist output not working on internal unit Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug fortran/78854] [F03] DTIO namelist output not working on internal unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78854 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug libstdc++/78851] Resolve DR 550 in cmath and continue using __builtin_powil() even in C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78851 --- Comment #2 from Vadim Zeitlin --- Sorry if I misunderstood but what exactly am I misinterpreting? Looking at the code (and comment) at https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/6514c52372bb36e555843b0419d71cf55eda0409/libstdc++-v3/include/c_glob

[Bug target/78855] New: -mtune=generic should keep cmp/jcc together. AMD and Intel both macro-fuse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78855 Bug ID: 78855 Summary: -mtune=generic should keep cmp/jcc together. AMD and Intel both macro-fuse Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed

[Bug driver/78772] -fstrict-aliasing should turn on Wstrict-aliasing automaticly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78772 --- Comment #12 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn --- (In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #11) Hi Jim, Thank you for your patient explanations. > > If you have code with a lot of pointer casts, you should probably be > compiling with -fno-stric

[Bug libstdc++/78851] Resolve DR 550 in cmath and continue using __builtin_powil() even in C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78851 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- On linux with glibc, both versions output the same number, so your libm is to blame. Normally, the int version, implemented with multiplications, may be less accurate than the general version. And gcc does gene

[Bug tree-optimization/78856] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20161218