[Bug debug/78839] [6/7 Regression] DWARF output different between GCC 5 and 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78839 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Compon

[Bug c++/78840] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with const variables in templates implicitly captured by nested lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78840 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78843] error: 'functionname' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78843 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/78844] New: target_clones causes compiler memory corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78844 Bug ID: 78844 Summary: target_clones causes compiler memory corruption Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: o

[Bug target/78844] [6 Regression] target_clones causes compiler memory corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78844 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* S

[Bug c++/78842] "error: declaration of 'bool icase' shadows a parameter" should be warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78842 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78844] [6 Regression] target_clones causes compiler memory corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78844 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/78419] ICE with target_clone on invalid target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78419 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at uplinklabs dot net --- C

[Bug target/78844] [6 Regression] target_clones causes compiler memory corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78844 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78844] [6 Regression] target_clones causes compiler memory corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78844 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- On the trunk I get similar corruption ICE with r242607, r242608 turns it into another ICE because of the broken avx5124fma patches, finally fixed with r242627. But 6 branch doesn't have the avx5124fma support

[Bug ada/78845] New: Inverse (Real_Matrix) result has wrong bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78845 Bug ID: 78845 Summary: Inverse (Real_Matrix) result has wrong bounds Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug tree-optimization/77445] [7 Regression] Performance drop after r239219 on coremark test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77445 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/78822] [cleanup] replace static char buffers by build_message_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78822 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[cleanup] replace static|[cleanup] replace static

[Bug fortran/78239] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in char_len_param_value, at fortran/decl.c:926, with -fimplicit-none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78239 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Dec 17 11:13:16 2016 New Revision: 243773 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243773&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-12-17 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/78239 * decl.c(c

[Bug target/78105] ICE during LTO bootstrap on AARCH64 with gold linker

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78105 PeteVine changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12 f

[Bug libstdc++/71444] Error constants for MinGW-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71444 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/65618] [5/6/7 Regression] gnat bootstrap comparison failure on mips{,el}-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65618 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/78833] Misleading IOMSG after failed WRITE(...,POS=) on unconnected formatted stream file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78833 --- Comment #3 from mecej4 at operamail dot com --- I understand what happens, and this is not a bug per se', but in normal usage the message wording can be confusing. During the second run, the OPEN fails because 'NEW' is specified and the file

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #5) > Btw, this variant is wrongly rejected: > > [..] > >NAMELIST /nml/ x >1 > Error: NAMELIST object ‘x’ in namelist ‘nml’ at (1) is polymorphi

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- So, here is a corrected test for the polymorphic case: MODULE m IMPLICIT NONE TYPE :: t CHARACTER :: c CONTAINS PROCEDURE :: write_formatted GENERIC :: WRITE(FORMATTED) => write_f

[Bug fortran/78239] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in char_len_param_value, at fortran/decl.c:926, with -fimplicit-none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78239 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Author: tkoenig > Date: Sat Dec 17 11:13:16 2016 > New Revision: 243773 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243773&root=gcc&view=rev > ... The two tests give an ICE: see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- This patch seems to produce the correct dump for the example in comment 7: Index: gcc/fortran/trans-io.c === --- gcc/fortran/trans-io

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org |janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/78105] ICE during LTO bootstrap on AARCH64 with gold linker

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78105 --- Comment #13 from PeteVine --- Also, could these (sample) warnings actually matter when using ld.gold? NB, lra-constraints.c features in the previously provided backtrace: ../../libdecnumber/decNumber.c:3582:0: note: code may be misoptimized

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 40357 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40357&action=edit draft patch The attached patch seems to make the original comment 0 as well as the polymorphic versi

[Bug libfortran/78833] Misleading IOMSG after failed WRITE(...,POS=) on unconnected formatted stream file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78833 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/78239] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in char_len_param_value, at fortran/decl.c:926, with -fimplicit-none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78239 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #10) > The attached patch seems to make the original comment 0 as well as the > polymorphic version in comment 7 work. Regtesting now ... Regtesting was successful.

[Bug fortran/78822] [cleanup] replace static char buffers by build_message_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78822 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/78846] New: std1y compiler infinite output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78846 Bug ID: 78846 Summary: std1y compiler infinite output Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assi

[Bug libfortran/78833] Misleading IOMSG after failed WRITE(...,POS=) on unconnected formatted stream file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78833 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #9) > Jerry, I don't want to steal this PR from you ;) but I think I have a rather > complete patch by now. If you have any comments, please let me know! You save me a lot of

[Bug fortran/78239] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in char_len_param_value, at fortran/decl.c:926, with -fimplicit-none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78239 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Dec 17 17:03:49 2016 New Revision: 243776 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243776&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-12-17 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/78239 * decl.c (

[Bug fortran/78239] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in char_len_param_value, at fortran/decl.c:926, with -fimplicit-none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78239 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- It helps to actually commit the fix, not only the test case and the ChangeLog entry :-)

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #13 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Janus, Why do you think that both input and output is required? How is namelist supposed to work with classes? Just with the declared type? Cheers Paul On 17 December 2016 at 1

[Bug c++/78846] std1y compiler infinite output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78846 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #13) > Why do you think that both input and output is required? Don't know. My intuitive reaction was that comment 5 should be valid, but I

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #11) > (In reply to janus from comment #10) > > The attached patch seems to make the original comment 0 as well as the > > polymorphic version in comment 7 work. Regtesting no

[Bug sanitizer/78832] [7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78832 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Dec 17 19:10:39 2016 New Revision: 243777 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243777&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/78832 * sanopt.c (sanitize_asan_mark_unpoison

[Bug sanitizer/78832] [7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78832 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78847] New: pointer arithmetic from c++ ranged-based for loop not optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78847 Bug ID: 78847 Summary: pointer arithmetic from c++ ranged-based for loop not optimized Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78848] New: [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 Bug ID: 78848 Summary: [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #16 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Dear Janus, What troubles me is that most times I have used namelist, it has been primarily for input to codes; especially where there is a default set of initial conditions and a sub

[Bug fortran/78848] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also one can wonder what kind of code should be generated here. When using the type-bound form of the DTIO procedure, we generate a truly polymorphic reference to the DTIO procedure when printing a

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Dec 17 23:10:01 2016 New Revision: 243778 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243778&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-12-17 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/78746

[Bug fortran/78661] [OOP] Namelist output missing object designator under DTIO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78661 --- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #16) > I suppose that one would have to set up the namelist or the input > stream to determine what the dynamic type is, have the code alloca

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 40359 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40359&action=edit charlen_30.f90 testcase

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 40360 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40360&action=edit charlen_10.f90 source code

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- I have removed the two failing testcase and attached them to this PR. It is likely the dg-error will need to be updated when the bug is fixed.

[Bug target/78849] New: ICE on initialization of global struct containing __int20 array at varasm.c:4968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78849 Bug ID: 78849 Summary: ICE on initialization of global struct containing __int20 array at varasm.c:4968 Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug target/71216] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect PPC assembly due to inserted .machine pseudo-op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71216 --- Comment #9 from Rin Okuyama --- Hi Segher, Thank you for your kind reply. I committed your fix to NetBSD's local tree of GCC 5.4. > > However, I have a question on this fix. How about the case where > > "-Wa,-mXXX" option is given without "

[Bug fortran/78848] [OOP] ICE on writing CLASS variable with non-typebound DTIO procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78848 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment