https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #14)
> Hi Paul,
>
> Based on comment #12, I assume you no longer believe that type guarding is
> required. If I misinterpreted comment #12, please let me know. Otherwi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78766
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78682
--- Comment #6 from Stefano Zaghi ---
Created attachment 40307
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40307&action=edit
MCVE of CAF-DT with allocatable member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78682
--- Comment #7 from Stefano Zaghi ---
Dear all,
I confirm that with gcc 7.0.0 this ICE vanishes.
However, I find a new ICE. I am not sure if it is good to report it here or if
it is better to open a new ticket. In doubt, I start adding some det
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78689
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
From looking at inh-ctor23.C and what GCC and clang++ produce, there are
different cases:
_ZN1VCI21WEi emitted in _ZN1VCI51WEi comdat, with _ZN1VCI11WEi alias to it,
which has the extra argument, callers pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18438
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18438
--- Comment #10 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
(In reply to Maxim Kuvyrkov from comment #9)
> which then becomes for aarch64:
> .L4:
> ld2 {v0.2d - v1.2d}, [x1]
> add w2, w2, 1
> cmp w2, w7
> eor v0.16b, v2.16b, v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18438
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Maxim Kuvyrkov from comment #9)
> I've looked into another case where inability to handle stores with gaps
> generates sub-optimal code. I'm interested in spending some time on fixing
> this, p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78771
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78772
Bug ID: 78772
Summary: -fstrict-aliasing should turn on Wstrict-aliasing
automaticly
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72786
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||safinaskar at mail dot ru
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78770
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78772
--- Comment #1 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn ---
Created attachment 40308
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40308&action=edit
proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78767
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71270
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78748
--- Comment #4 from Dominik Vogt ---
Regression test of a polished version of the patch is running.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78772
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
-Wstrict-aliasing is already included in -Wall which most people turn on. -W
(-Wextra) is the other most turn on too. Strict-overflow cause issues too if
not careful or not understand the language you are wri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78773
Bug ID: 78773
Summary: "Empty" const only class not optimized away
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78772
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78773
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Since you already use some c++11 features why don't use constexpr too. Note
there is a duplicate of this bug already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78773
--- Comment #2 from jpakkane at gmail dot com ---
I tried constexpr and it did not have any effect so I just left it out for
simplicity. Sorry for the dupe. I tried searching but could not come up with a
suitable search term to find it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18438
--- Comment #12 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> (In reply to Maxim Kuvyrkov from comment #9)
> > which then becomes for aarch64:
> > .L4:
> > ld2 {v0.2d - v1.2d}, [x1]
> > add w2, w2, 1
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78701
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78763
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78757
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78763
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78772
--- Comment #4 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3)
> Please no.
> There are many other cases where optimizations could introduce issues that
> you will not notice when you compile without warnings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> I'm not much familiar with the vector instructions, however the change
> started with r239889.
Arguably r239889 fixed a bug where the tuning was ignored. Now this m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78772
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to ma.jiang from comment #4)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3)
> > Please no.
> > There are many other cases where optimizations could introduce issues that
> > you will not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77905
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77905
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77904
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Mon Dec 12 10:58:17 2016
New Revision: 243543
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243543&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR77904: callee-saved register trashed when clobbering sp
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There were some "select type"-related commits by Paul and Jakub in October
which could potentially be the culprit here:
* r241403 (PR 69566)
* r241450 (PR 69834)
* r241630 (PR 78026)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
ErikaMolnar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78763
--- Comment #3 from Jiri Danek ---
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:14 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
> Hi. I can confirm that the docker command triggers ICE. However manually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77309
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Mon Dec 12 13:00:53 2016
New Revision: 243549
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243549&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2016-11-07 Bernd Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77309
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Mon Dec 12 13:01:28 2016
New Revision: 243550
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243550&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2016-11-07 Bernd Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78669
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Mon Dec 12 13:29:48 2016
New Revision: 243551
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243551&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/78669
* ira.c (combine_and_move_insn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77844
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For a single bb function I don't see how there could be a problem with
converging during var-tracking.
I think the problem is elsewhere, during combine.
E.g. we have:
(debug_insn 3303 3302 3304 2 (var_locatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78762
Venkataramanan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||venkataramanan.kumar at amd
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774
Bug ID: 78774
Summary: Internal compiler error segmentation fault: constexpr
string literals and templates
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78621
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78716
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Dec 12 13:57:32 2016
New Revision: 243553
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243553&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78716
* gimplify.c (gimplify_va_arg_expr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775
Bug ID: 78775
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_alloc_args_overflow
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77904
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15)
> (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #14)
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Based on comment #12, I assume you no longer believe that type guarding is
> > required. If I mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78716
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Dec 12 14:09:39 2016
New Revision: 243554
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243554&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport all Filesystem library fixes from trunk
This implements the fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71337
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Dec 12 14:09:39 2016
New Revision: 243554
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243554&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport all Filesystem library fixes from trunk
This implements the fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78763
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I was able to run bash in the container, however I can't isolate the issue as
it executes an python script with some ENV variables. Can you please test it
with openSUSE?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Dec 12 14:09:39 2016
New Revision: 243554
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243554&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport all Filesystem library fixes from trunk
This implements the fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78669
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78776
Bug ID: 78776
Summary: member using declaration with typename ICEs
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78776
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
--- Comment #39 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Mark, could you please post your path to gcc-patches?
Then there might be a chance to get it into binutils before 2.28 gets released.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78748
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Vogt ---
Updated and tested patch posted to gcc-patches:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01033.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
--- Comment #6 from ErikaMolnar ---
Thank you for your help! Looking forward to this new feature.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78777
Bug ID: 78777
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at
tree-eh.c:3823 (aarch64-linux-gnu)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78777
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15)
> Dear Damian and Janus,
>
> What I meant is that we did not implement dynamic dispatch of the dtio
> procedures. In the corrected testcase of comments #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78777
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The ICE I'm getting is:
ice.c: In function 'void l(h*, int, unsigned char*, int)':
ice.c:11:6: error: statement marked for throw in middle of block
void l(h *o, int p, unsigned char *q, int r) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
We're in operand_signed_p, checking whether an SSA_NAME d_4 is signed or not.
We look at its SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT which is
d_4 = PHI <0(2), d_5(5)>
and we walk these phi arguments, and we call operand_signed_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Dec 12 15:00:43 2016
New Revision: 243557
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243557&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport all Filesystem library fixes from trunk
This implements the fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15)
> See this further example, which works with the last version of the patch.
Here is another runtime example, which in contrast to comment #15 does not
ut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78777
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 40312
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40312&action=edit
unreduced test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Dec 12 15:00:43 2016
New Revision: 243557
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243557&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport all Filesystem library fixes from trunk
This implements the fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71337
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |5.5
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Also fixed for 5.5 and 6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
So either some games with TREE_VISITED, or keep some hash_set of visited
SSA_NAMEs, or when scanning the PHI arguments, check whether its argument's
definition is also a PHI and has OP in it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78725
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz ---
Thanks for the second testcase as well. It's not quite the same miscompilation
(the induction vars don't overflow), but a related one (the value of d
considered in the conditional statement is the final one a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78725
--- Comment #5 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #4)
> Thanks for the second testcase as well. It's not quite the same
> miscompilation
> (the induction vars don't overflow), but a related one (the value of d
> conside
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #19 from Damian Rouson ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #16)
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #14)
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > Based on comment #12, I assume you no long
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774
--- Comment #4 from Damian Kaczmarek ---
Thanks for a prompt reply. Are there any known workarounds?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78738
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Dec 12 16:02:28 2016
New Revision: 243559
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243559&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78738
* config/i386/i386.h (X87_ENABLE_A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78738
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71337
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Dec 12 15:00:43 2016
New Revision: 243557
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243557&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport all Filesystem library fixes from trunk
This implements the fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737
--- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Damian Rouson from comment #19)
> > On thinking about it, is the specific instance of write_formatted allowed?
>
> I believe not. Note 7.50 of the 31 August 2016 draft Fortran 2015 s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78465
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Dec 12 16:20:49 2016
New Revision: 243561
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243561&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78465 Remove runtime tests for macros
PR libstdc++/78465
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78777
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78774
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78465
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Dec 12 16:36:25 2016
New Revision: 243564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243564&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78465 Remove runtime tests for macros
PR libstdc++/78465
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78778
Bug ID: 78778
Summary: non-atomic load moved to before atomic load with
std::memory_order_acquire
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77309
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72717
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo