https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 9 08:43:50 2016
New Revision: 243475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78482
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 9 08:43:50 2016
New Revision: 243475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 9 08:43:50 2016
New Revision: 243475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71848
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 9 08:43:50 2016
New Revision: 243475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78224
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 9 08:43:50 2016
New Revision: 243475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 9 08:43:50 2016
New Revision: 243475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77646
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 9 08:43:50 2016
New Revision: 243475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859
Bug 59859 depends on bug 71575, which changed state.
Bug 71575 Summary: [6 Regression] [graphite] internal compiler error: in
copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2500
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78188
--- Comment #27 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 9 08:43:50 2016
New Revision: 243475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78739
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78741
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with
commit 6b66bc4ba37a18494643bf1d9dd8721f77baff96
Merge: 5c3f347 6c86f9e
Author: mrs
Date: Tue May 6 16:25:05 2014 +
Merge in wide-int.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78699
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78699
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78707
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
Summary|[4.8/4.9/5/6 Reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78027
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78743
Bug ID: 78743
Summary: g++ segfaults when printing warning for captured
constexpr variable
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40284
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40284&action=edit
gcc7-pr78720.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78709
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78713
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78726
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 9 09:21:36 2016
New Revision: 243476
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78726
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (make_new_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78743
--- Comment #1 from bjarni.sigurdsson at marel dot com ---
FYI: This code does not cause a segfault for GCC 5.2.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78726
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
Hi Eric,
thanks for fixing this. Shouldn't we keep the PR open, though? It's
still an ice-on-invalid.
Rainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78725
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78726
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78740
--- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, I am not familiar with powerpc targets, how should I restrict test case on
targets that support -m32? In gcc.target/powerpc/fusion4.c, there are
/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* &&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78738
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78744
Bug ID: 78744
Summary: Build errors on OS X 12.1 with Xcode 8.1 on GCC 4.8.3
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78745
Bug ID: 78745
Summary: Truncated messages in po file
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: translation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> thanks for fixing this. Shouldn't we keep the PR open, though? It's
> still an ice-on-invalid.
Given that it didn't raise much interest as ice-on-valid-code, I wouldn't
expect it to raise interest as ic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78745
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78744
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78743
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
FWIW, my untested fix was
--- a/gcc/tree-data-ref.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-data-ref.c
@@ -2781,6 +2781,10 @@ can_use_analyze_subscript_affine_affine (tree *chrec_a,
tree *chrec_b)
/* FIXME: For the moment not h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
Bug ID: 78746
Summary: charlen_15.f90, charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78743
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78743
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That has been backported already, see r243382.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78747
Bug ID: 78747
Summary: Duplicate _S_empty_rep_storage causes crash when
STV_HIDDEN
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78743
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78748
Bug ID: 78748
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311
(s390x-linux-gnu)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
>
> --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
> FWIW, my untested fix was
>
> --- a/gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78743
--- Comment #6 from bjarni.sigurdsson at marel dot com ---
Is this fix part of 6.2.1 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78743
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
6.2.1 stands for a 6 branch snapshot in between the 6.2 and 6.3 releases. Most
of those snapshots of course don't have that fix, only those from the last day
and half or so do. 6.3 is planned to be released
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is also that
bool
cst_and_fits_in_hwi (const_tree x)
{
return (TREE_CODE (x) == INTEGER_CST
&& TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (x)) <= HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT);
}
returns false for a __int12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Yea, I noticed these as well. Let me know if you want me to do some cleanups
here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749
Bug ID: 78749
Summary: [7 Regression] bogus warning for friend member
function in anonymous namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78743
--- Comment #8 from bjarni.sigurdsson at marel dot com ---
Sorry, I mixed up the dates in the changelog (2016-09-16 vs. 2016-12-07)
Of course I don't expect a 36 hour fix to be available in an older snapshot :)
Thanks for the quick response. We w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742
>
> --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
> Yea, I noticed these as well. Let me know
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78708
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78699
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
#12 0x013e3c0a in vectorizable_load (
stmt=, gsi=0x7fffd140,
vec_stmt=0x7fffd058, slp_node=0x296b970, slp_node_instance=0x278b4e0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78748
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78749
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
This warning happens a lot when compiling LLVM (for friend operators).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78610
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78750
Bug ID: 78750
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in get_range_info, at
tree-ssanames.c:375
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #18 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Dec 9 11:55:27 2016
New Revision: 243478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/44265
* gfortran.h :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78750
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78699
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, not easily (that's even an understatement...). It's going to be
Index: gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c (rev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78750
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78750
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Confirmed it's r243419.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78550
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Dec 9 12:18:36 2016
New Revision: 243479
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243479&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/78550
* convert.c (convert_to_integer_1): Maybe f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78744
aroldan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Build errors on OS X 12.1 |Build errors on OS X 12.1
|w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265
--- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 40286
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40286&action=edit
Failing testcases with -flto under Darwin
The PR is fixed under Linux but gives a link error under Darwin with -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78189
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 9 12:35:56 2016
New Revision: 243481
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243481&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78750
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505
--- Comment #3 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Fri Dec 9 12:46:57 2016
New Revision: 243482
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243482&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-12-09 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78751
Bug ID: 78751
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311
(error: unrecognizable insn) w/ -Os -misel
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78713
--- Comment #2 from Avi Kivity ---
I think the middle-end knows it is safe to write to *this, because this is
happening in a constructor, so all of the object's memory is known clobbered.
Similarly, if the assignment operator is written as
o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78505
--- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Waiting one week for regression reports.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78713
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Currently the middle-end only knows about constructors via
DECL_CXX_CONSTRUCTOR_P. I suppose it would be more useful to communicate that
a function fully initializes an object pointed to by parameter X.
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78750
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
The following should fix it.
diff --git a/gcc/builtins.c b/gcc/builtins.c
index 20515e7..08bf148 100644
--- a/gcc/builtins.c
+++ b/gcc/builtins.c
@@ -3025,7 +3025,8 @@ get_size_range (tree exp, tree range[2]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78751
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78713
--- Comment #4 from Avi Kivity ---
This bug has a cousin https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61982 where
the optimizer doesn't eliminate a store to an object that is about to be
destroyed. While for sure it is easier to implement in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Dec 9 13:21:44 2016
New Revision: 243483
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243483&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-09 Janus Weil
PR fortran/61767
* cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 61767, which changed state.
Bug 61767 Summary: [OOP] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper at
fortran/class.c:1491
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78750
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Actually, this should be better:
--- a/gcc/builtins.c
+++ b/gcc/builtins.c
@@ -3091,7 +3091,7 @@ check_sizes (int opt, tree exp, tree size, tree maxlen,
tree str, tree objsize)
{
/* STR is normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78752
Bug ID: 78752
Summary: [concepts] ICE with constrained variadic member
function
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78725
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
