[Bug tree-optimization/78692] [7 Regression] ICE (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78692 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78689] [7 Regression] ICE (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78689 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc

[Bug c++/78693] New: [6/7 Regression] Bogus 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78693 Bug ID: 78693 Summary: [6/7 Regression] Bogus 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/78692] [7 Regression] ICE (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78692 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/78694] New: [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694 Bug ID: 78694 Summary: [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug middle-end/78691] [7 Regression] ICE compiling Linux boot code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78691 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry for the problem, I will investigate it. Thanks,

[Bug tree-optimization/78675] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of BIT_FIELD_REF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78675 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 6 09:21:13 2016 New Revision: 243283 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243283&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-12-06 Jakub Jelinek PR tree-optimization/78675 *

[Bug c++/71537] GCC rejects consetxpr boolean conversions and comparisons on the result of pointer arithmetic.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71537 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 6 09:22:36 2016 New Revision: 243284 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243284&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/71537 * fold-const-call.c (fold_const_call): Handl

[Bug c++/71537] GCC rejects consetxpr boolean conversions and comparisons on the result of pointer arithmetic.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71537 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 6 09:23:51 2016 New Revision: 243285 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243285&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-12-06 Jakub Jelinek PR c++/71537 * fold-const-ca

[Bug c++/71537] GCC rejects consetxpr boolean conversions and comparisons on the result of pointer arithmetic.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71537 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 6 09:24:36 2016 New Revision: 243286 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243286&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/71537 * fold-const.c (fold_comparison): Assume CON

[Bug target/78694] [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/78365] [7 Regression] ICE in determine_value_range, at tree-ssa-loo p-niter.c:413

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78365 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug tree-optimization/78681] [7 Regressions] ICE in determine_value_range, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:413

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78681 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78694] [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #1) > what is the configuration you're trying to build? A bare metal ARM EABI compiler should reproduce the problem. I try to build the arm-rtems4.12-gcc with a patch to

[Bug target/78694] [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can't reproduce on an arm-none-eabi compiler built with RTL checking. Do you pass any particular --with-arch/cpu/fpu/float options?

[Bug target/77493] [6/7 Regression] -fcrossjumping (-O2) on ppc64le causes segfaults (jump to 0x0) (first bad r230091)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77493 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78691] [7 Regression] ICE compiling Linux boot code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78691 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milest

[Bug c++/78690] [7 Regression] ICE in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78690 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78690] [7 Regression] ICE in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78690 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c/78666] conflicting attribute alloc_size accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78666 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug middle-end/78566] [7 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6_[abc]*.c regressions on some non-x86 platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Dec 6 10:33:41 2016 New Revision: 243288 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243288&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/78566 * tree-ssa-uninit.c (can_one_predicat

[Bug middle-end/78548] [7 Regression ]ICE on valid C code on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O2 and -O3 in 64-bit mode with -Wall (*** Error in `/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/cc1': d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78548 --- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Dec 6 10:35:37 2016 New Revision: 243289 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243289&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/78548 * tree-ssa-uninit.c (simplify_preds_4

[Bug middle-end/78566] [7 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6_[abc]*.c regressions on some non-x86 platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78548] [7 Regression ]ICE on valid C code on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O2 and -O3 in 64-bit mode with -Wall (*** Error in `/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/cc1': d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78548 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78689] [7 Regression] ICE (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78689 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78655] gcc doesn't exploit the fact that the result of pointer addition can not be nullptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78655 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug c/78657] Using macro with _Pragma gives error: '#pragma' is not allowed here

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78657 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- This isn't how preprocessing works I think (thus INVALID)

[Bug sanitizer/78663] [7 Regression] Hundreds of asan failures on x86_64-apple-darwin10 at r243019

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78663 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/78675] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: integral result type precision does not match field size of BIT_FIELD_REF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78675 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/78680] [7 Regression] ICE in get_substring_ranges_for_loc, at input.c:1398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78680 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |preprocessor Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/78684] [7 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:2074

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug target/78694] [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Huber --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3) > I can't reproduce on an arm-none-eabi compiler built with RTL checking. Do > you pass any particular --with-arch/cpu/fpu/float options? I built an arm-eabi-gcc usin

[Bug debug/78685] -Og generates too many ""s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78684] [7 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:2074

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78693] [6/7 Regression] Bogus 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78693 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3

[Bug middle-end/78691] [7 Regression] ICE compiling Linux boot code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78691 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/78689] [7 Regression] ICE (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78689 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/78695] New: [7 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695 Bug ID: 78695 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug middle-end/78684] [7 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:2074

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/78687] inefficient code generated for eggs.variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug target/78695] [7 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug target/78694] [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- I cannot reproduce with that revision. Again, how do you configure your gcc. What is the output of arm-eabi-gcc -v that you built?

[Bug target/78694] [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2

-multilib Thread model: single gcc version 7.0.0 20161206 (experimental) [master revision c59a180:88a522b:8c1527e8f37c8e80912aa3a465d623381aaa41e0] (GCC)

[Bug preprocessor/78680] [7 Regression] ICE in get_substring_ranges_for_loc, at input.c:1398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78680 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/78685] -Og generates too many ""s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- If -Og does not force user variables/parameters to stack nor forces an artificial use of the var at the end of their scope, then it will always happen, the rest is purely best effort, see if the var value can

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 --- Comment #10 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9) > Created attachment 40217 [details] > predict > > Hi, > here is patch adding the polymorphic case, too. > > Honza Looks good - gap still improves by 12

[Bug debug/78685] -Og generates too many ""s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 6 Dec 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685 > > --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- > If -Og does not force user variables/paramete

[Bug tree-optimization/78696] New: [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value misoptimizes %.Ng where N is greater than 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696 Bug ID: 78696 Summary: [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value misoptimizes %.Ng where N is greater than 10 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug tree-optimization/78696] [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value misoptimizes %.Ng where N is greater than 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/78685] -Og generates too many ""s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > Sth orthogonal to -Og, -fkeep-vars-live=N with some level, default > to N > 0 for -Og maybe. > > Of course it will likely pessimize code as I don't see how w

[Bug tree-optimization/78696] [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value misoptimizes %.Ng where N is greater than 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/78687] inefficient code generated for eggs.variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- >From looking at the testcase, I think it is solely SRA that can help here, if it manages to scalarize everything, we are good, if not, you get terrible code. The classes are huge and largely uninitialized, a

[Bug tree-optimization/78687] inefficient code generated for eggs.variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug libstdc++/78442] [variant] std::get<...>(Variant) is not constexpr.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78442 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78696] [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value misoptimizes %.Ng where N is greater than 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696 Vidya Praveen changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-none-linux-gnu C

[Bug tree-optimization/78696] [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value misoptimizes %.Ng where N is greater than 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-none-linux-gnu |*-*-* --- Comment #2 from James Green

[Bug tree-optimization/78687] inefficient code generated for eggs.variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 6 Dec 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78687 > > --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- > From looking at the testcase, I think it is s

[Bug tree-optimization/78696] [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value misoptimizes %.Ng where N is greater than 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |7.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78696] [7 Regression] -fprintf-return-value misoptimizes %.Ng where N is greater than 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78696 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- The g/G handling looks indeed totally broken, not just for the > 10 precisions, even for %.9g it assumes it will be in between 11 and 13 characters, which is of course wrong. But even generally, for all float

[Bug middle-end/67335] [6 Regression] ICE in compiling omp simd function with unused argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67335 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71182] [6/7 Regression] parser.c cp_lexer_previous_token sanitizer detects member call on null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/71856] [6/7 Regression] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG-mode breaks GNU parallel extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71856 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/72808] [6 Regression] ICE on valid c++ code in verify_type (gcc/tree.c:14047)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Version|unknown

[Bug c++/72813] [6/7 Regression] atomic header cannot be compiled into translation unit with -fkeep-inline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72813 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/77284] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code using initializer list: in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:5480

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77284 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/77347] [6/7 Regression] Incorrect auto deduction failure in template class member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77347 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/77483] [6/7 regression] gcc.target/i386/mask-unpack.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77483 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77482] [6 Regression] Segfault when compiling ill-formed constexpr code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77482 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/77581] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: instantiate_template_1, cp/pt.c:17391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77581 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/77591] [6 Regression] decltype(auto) and ternary operator allow returning local reference without a warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77591 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/77626] [6 Regression] ICE with -Wall on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault, byte_from_pos, cxx_fold_indirect_ref)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77626 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/71182] [6/7 Regression] parser.c cp_lexer_previous_token sanitizer detects member call on null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Can't reproduce on trunk or GCC 6 branch. What options are required? You need to use an -fsanitize=undefined instrumented compiler. No options required.

[Bug c++/77639] [6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: tree check: accessed elt 1 of tree_vec with 0 elts in unify, at cp/pt.c:19674)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77639 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/77907] [6 Regression] Add "const" to argument of constexpr constructor causes the object to be left in unconstructed state

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77907 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/77957] [5/6 Regression] Undefined .LCTOC0 with -fstack-protector-strong -mminimal-toc -O0 on ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug fortran/77973] [6 Regression] ICE in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.c:3841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/77975] [6/7 Regression] Missed optimization for some small constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77975 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/78224] [5/6 Regression] g++ ICE at -O2(-O1 on gcc6) and above in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1646

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ncopa at alpinelinux dot org --- Commen

[Bug lto/78407] [5/6/7 Regression] LTO breaks separate overriding of symbol aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78407 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/78004] [6/7 Regression] g++ segfaults when compiling qt 4.8.7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78299] [6 Regression] ICE in expand_omp_for_static_nochunk, at omp-low.c:9622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78299 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/78540] [6 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4062 with -O -march=core2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/78343] [6 Regression] Loop is not eliminated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78343 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/78550] [6/7 Regression] bit field and std::initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/78542] [6 Regression] wrong code at -Og results in endless loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/78580] [6/7 Regression] Segfault in gcc with multilib (-m32) and -ffixed-*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78580 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* Priority|P3

[Bug c++/78572] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/77484] [6/7 Regression] Static branch predictor causes ~6-8% regression of SPEC2000 GAP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- I'm planning to run SPEC benchmarks late this week to find a proper value for the new predictor.

[Bug target/77439] [6/7 regression] wrong code for sibcall with longcall, APCS frame and VFP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77439 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P1

[Bug target/77728] [5/6/7 Regression] Miscompilation multiple vector iteration on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77728 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2

[Bug target/78255] [5/6/7 regression] Indirect sibling call causing wrong code generation for ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/78428] [5/6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78428 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2

[Bug target/78509] [7 regression] ICE in in excess_precision_type, at tree.c:8875

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78509 --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- > I don't have a box with 3dnow, but the assembly for -m32 -O2 -m3dnow -mno-sse > pr42549.c looks identical on x86_64-linux between gcc 6 and tr

[Bug libstdc++/51785] gets not anymore declared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785 andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andyg1001 at hotmail dot

[Bug c++/71182] [6/7 Regression] parser.c cp_lexer_previous_token sanitizer detects member call on null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Markus Tri

[Bug libobjc/78697] New: --with-target-bdw-gc-include shouldn't be required to be per multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78697 Bug ID: 78697 Summary: --with-target-bdw-gc-include shouldn't be required to be per multilib Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78686] ICE in gfc_apply_init, at fortran/expr.c:4124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78686 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78226] Fill out location information everywhere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226 --- Comment #13 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Tue Dec 6 13:41:46 2016 New Revision: 243300 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243300&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2016-12-06 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug c++/71182] [6/7 Regression] parser.c cp_lexer_previous_token sanitizer detects member call on null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- So, perhaps: diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c index 08f5f9e52ef2..f430af97fdf1 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c @@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ cp_lexer_previous_token (cp_lexer *lex

  1   2   3   >