[Bug c/78584] Bug in GCC argument parser expandargv

2016-11-29 Thread fw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78584 --- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer --- Hmm. Maybe it is file-system-specific. I don't see the anomalous return values on XFS and tmpfs.

[Bug c/78584] Bug in GCC argument parser expandargv

2016-11-29 Thread dj at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78584 DJ Delorie changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from DJ Delorie --

[Bug tree-optimization/78529] [7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c failed with lto/O2

2016-11-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-11/msg03338.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/78342] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2657 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

2016-11-29 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342 --- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5) > Please file a separate bug. I've filed PR78607.

[Bug tree-optimization/78607] New: [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: missing barrier after block 2)

2016-11-29 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78607 Bug ID: 78607 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: missing barrier after block 2) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords

[Bug fortran/78573] [7 Regression] [OOP] ICE in resolve_component, at fortran/resolve.c:13405

2016-11-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78573 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Wed Nov 30 07:25:36 2016 New Revision: 242996 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242996&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-30 Janus Weil PR fortran/78573 * dec

[Bug fortran/78573] [7 Regression] [OOP] ICE in resolve_component, at fortran/resolve.c:13405

2016-11-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78573 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug rtl-optimization/78588] rtlanal.c:5210:38: runtime error: shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'

2016-11-29 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78588 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Author: trippels Date: Wed Nov 30 07:30:55 2016 New Revision: 242997 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242997&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR78588 - rtlanal.c:5210:38: runtime error: shift exponent 42

[Bug fortran/78592] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_specific_dtio_proc, at fortran/interface.c:4939

2016-11-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78592 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug fortran/78593] [6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_varspec, at fortran/primary.c:2053

2016-11-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78593 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/78588] rtlanal.c:5210:38: runtime error: shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'

2016-11-29 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78588 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78583] [7 Regression] ICE on valid C code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in simplify_truncation)

2016-11-29 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78583 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassig

<    1   2   3