https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
Bug ID: 78555
Summary: gcc/sreal.c:232:20: runtime error: left shift of
negative value -2018967552
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78556
Bug ID: 78556
Summary: config/rs6000/rs6000.c:6217:36: runtime error: left
shift of negative value -12301
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78556
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Sorry, should be:
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
index 6c28e6a..89751c5 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
@@ -6214,7 +6214,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41076
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Nov 28 08:40:11 2016
New Revision: 242907
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242907&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 41076
* config/avr/avr.md (SPLIT34): New mode iterator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41076
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65964
Bug 65964 depends on bug 41076, which changed state.
Bug 41076 Summary: [avr] pessimal code for logical OR of 8-bit fields
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41076
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Another approach may be to make the middleend ask the backend for the actual
> value of REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN (VIRTUAL_STACK_DYNAMIC_REGNUM). Since on Sparc
> the address is always 4 mod 8, we'd get an addi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78528
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
And I don't see how we can easily do this (or why it should be worth all the
hassle).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Mon Nov 28 08:59:01 2016
New Revision: 242908
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242908&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/78120
* rtlanal.c (insn_rtx_cost): R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78533
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78507
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
But e.g.
typedef unsigned __int128 u128;
u128 b;
int
main ()
{
u128 x = ((u128) ~0x7fff) - b;
u128 y = 1 - x;
if (y != 0x8001)
__builtin_abort();
return 0;
}
is miscompil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78535
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78539
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78541
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78548
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Known t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78550
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78547
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78557
Bug ID: 78557
Summary: [7.0 regression] ICE in trans-expr.c with -fcheck=all
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78548
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78557
--- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Oh, I'm using r241975 of the gcc trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78548
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Preliminary analysis shows 2 issues.
1) r217349 regressed an optimization, before that change we have been able to
b.0_2 = b;
x_3 = 0x8000 - b.0_2;
y_4 = 1 - x_3;
if (y_4 !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78555
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78558
Bug ID: 78558
Summary: Incorrect loop optimization leads to crash
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78557
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i386-pc-solaris2.12,|i386-pc-solaris2.12,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78558
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78528
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
:
MEM[(struct &)&D.2329] ={v} {CLOBBER};
D.2329.m_value = 0;
goto ;
:
_2 = s_5(D) + 1;
D.2336 = mystrlen (_2);
lhs$m_value_7 = MEM[(struct Int *)&D.2336];
_8 = lhs$m_value_7 + 1;
MEM[(stru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78558
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78549
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78211
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 28 10:00:43 2016
New Revision: 242910
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242910&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/78211
* ipa-icf.h (sem_item_optimizer): Add m_class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78559
Bug ID: 78559
Summary: [7 Regression] wrong code due to tree if-conversion?
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78559
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78557
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60145
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 40173
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40173&action=edit
2 patterns for the 4-byte case
The 2-byte case should be improved by r242909 but the 4-byte case just leads
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65964
Bug 65964 depends on bug 60145, which changed state.
Bug 60145 Summary: [AVR] Suboptimal code for byte order shuffling using shift
and or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60145
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60145
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78559
--- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for reporting. I will investigate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The SSA propagator does:
Visiting statement:
_11 = {x_4, x_4, x_4, x_4};
which is likely CONSTANT
Lattice value changed to VARYING. Adding SSA edges to worklist.
Visiting statement:
_12 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #53 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Nov 28 10:29:19 2016
New Revision: 242912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Darwin, config] Fix version number extraction to portable method
The meth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40174
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40174&action=edit
gcc7-pr78546.patch
Untested fix for 2), i.e. the wrong-code bug. For 1), i.e. the optimization
regression, I t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78343
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 28 10:49:12 2016
New Revision: 242913
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242913&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/78343
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
--- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry for the breakage, I am looking into the issue.
Regards,
Prathamesh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78550
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r230365.
Testcase without any headers:
namespace std
{
template
struct initializer_list
{
const T *a;
__SIZE_TYPE__ b;
constexpr initializer_list (const T *x, __SIZE_T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78560
Bug ID: 78560
Summary: powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78449
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78449
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52544
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78333
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgpiccinali at free dot fr
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78561
Bug ID: 78561
Summary: Constant pool size (offset) can become stale where
constant pool entires become unused
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78561
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64*-*-*
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70120
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78559
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Should reproduce still with -ftree-loop-if-convert after r242550?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78559
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Should reproduce still with -ftree-loop-if-convert after r242550?
Yes it does with 242837. Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78558
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||66598
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31667
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linux at carewolf dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60145
--- Comment #3 from Matthijs Kooijman ---
Thanks for digging into this :-D
I suppose you meant
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=242907 instead of the
commit you linked (which is also nice btw, I noticed that extra sbiw in s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Testing
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 2d4e019..9e5df64 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -1216,6 +1216,13 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
(if (cst && !TREE_OVERF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31667
--- Comment #4 from Allan Jensen ---
(In reply to Allan Jensen from comment #3)
> Gcc 5 and 6 produces code with pmovzx when compiling the example with -O3
> -msse4.1
>
> I assume this can be closed.
Note like comment 1 saids, it will not use a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
Bug ID: 78562
Summary: Wrong warning for built-in functions with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
>
> Marek Polacek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78535
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Starke ---
Created attachment 40176
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40176&action=edit
-fdump-ipa-devirt-details output
Requested -fdump-ipa-devirt-details output.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78563
Bug ID: 78563
Summary: SSE4.1 pmovzx shuffle pattern not recognized
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78563
--- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 40177
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40177&action=edit
Test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78564
Bug ID: 78564
Summary: cp-demangle fails to decode Ul+auto/anon
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78564
--- Comment #1 from Jan Engelhardt ---
crosslink https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20873
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Therefore the comment should be
/* CST1 - (CST2 - A) -> (CST1 - CST2) - A */
rather than
/* CST - (CST - A) -> CST - A */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
>
> --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Therefore the comment should be
> /* CST1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
--- Comment #11 from Georg Koppen ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Assuming r242055 fixed it then.
Yes, that issue is not showing up anymore when compiling with r242055.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78565
Bug ID: 78565
Summary: undefined reference to `aligned_alloc' when building
mingw-w64 cross-compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78563
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78557
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566
Bug ID: 78566
Summary: [7 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6_[abc].c
regressions on Arm and m68k
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #14 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Therefore the comment should be
> /* CST1 - (CST2 - A) -> (CST1 - CST2) - A */
> rather than
> /* CST - (CST - A) -> CST - A */
How comes it is not "CST1 - (C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78549
--- Comment #2 from mecej4 at operamail dot com ---
Thanks, Martin. After posting, I found that I could add more add more
attachments, but I was a bit worried that, as in other forums, the initial post
could not be edited or modified.
I presume t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60145
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |tree-optimization
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78298
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, zsojka at seznam dot cz wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546
>
> --- Comment #14 from Zdenek Sojka ---
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Thanks for looking into it.
IIUC it's a backend issue.
config/avr/builtins.def sets library names for some built-ins, and some
libnames are the same because the libgcc asm code is exactly the same, even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562
>
> --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
> Thanks for looking into it.
>
> IIUC it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71848
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
