https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #18 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard ---
Created attachment 40061
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40061&action=edit
x2.dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #17 from Dr. Kevin B. Beard ---
Hi,
Many thanks to Jerry DeLisle [jvdeli...@charter.net]; he made us realize
that an internal record is now not treated the same as an external record! I
didn't think of that.
In the atta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 40062
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40062&action=edit
reduced source code
I've reduced the original source to the attached. This emits 4 function
symbols, 2 of whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78390
Bug ID: 78390
Summary: Bootstrap failure: match.pd: cannot determine type of
operand
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Benson ---
I couldn't find anything in the OpenMP specifications which addresses this
issue - so presumably it's undefined behavior as far as OpenMP is concerned.
But it seems that internal file writes were intended to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78285
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Nov 17 01:23:19 2016
New Revision: 242532
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242532&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/78285
* c-common.c (c_add_case_label): Turn error_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78285
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #19 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:43:40AM +, kevin.b.beard at nasa dot gov wrote:
> Many thanks to Jerry DeLisle [jvdeli...@charter.net]; he made us realize
> that an internal record is now not treated the sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #20 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 01:44:45AM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
>
> In the above, you are hitting an end-of-record. I would need
> to go read the Standard to see what happens in this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Even though that with my patch we expansion_point_location_if_in_system_header
the caret location, it still points to the location in the system header, so
the diagnostics is suppressed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #10 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
Author: cltang
Date: Thu Nov 17 06:26:56 2016
New Revision: 242534
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242534&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-17 Chung-Lin Tang
PR target/78357
* config/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78357
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Huber ---
Thanks for your kind help. Would it be possible to back port this to GCC 6
also?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does -ffp-contract=off help?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66227
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Nov 17 07:52:24 2016
New Revision: 242535
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242535&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-17 Janus Weil
PR fortran/66227
* sim
401 - 418 of 418 matches
Mail list logo
