https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78122
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||55207
--- Comment #5 from janu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78009
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77784
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
--- Comment #6 from François Dumont ---
Created attachment 39984
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39984&action=edit
Stop using __builtin_snprintf until __has_builtin is supported.
Could you try this patch ? Until we have __ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78239
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 39985
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39985&action=edit
Proposed patch to get testing going
This patch works pretty good for me. My results are as follows:
gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78240
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78242
Bug ID: 78242
Summary: Error in testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/use-after-scope-8.c
since its introduction
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72822
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||orion at cora dot nwra.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to François Dumont from comment #6)
> Created attachment 39984 [details]
> Stop using __builtin_snprintf until __has_builtin is supported.
>
> Could you try this patch ? Until we have __has_built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon.heybrock at esss dot se
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78184
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78167
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm going to backport all the fixes to the
gcc-5-branch soon, so this will be fixed for 5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78156
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78231
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71313
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david_bjornbak at keysight dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78167
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #33 from Jerry DeLisle ---
With #pragma GCC optimize ( "-O3" )
$ gfc -static -O2 -finline-matmul-limit=0 compare.f90
$ ./a.out
=
MEASURED GIGAFLO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78229
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 7 22:35:43 2016
New Revision: 241942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78229
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_gimple_fold_bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78243
Bug ID: 78243
Summary: incorrect byte offset in vextractuh with -mcpu=power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78244
Bug ID: 78244
Summary: Narrowing conversion is accepted in a function
template, but it should be rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78245
Bug ID: 78245
Summary: missing -Wformat-length on an overflow of a
dynamically allocated buffer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78245
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723
--- Comment #4 from Walter Spector ---
As you are surmising, there are actually two problems in the example. First,
'data' needs the 'target' attribute in order to be pointed to. Second, 'data'
must either have the 'target' or a 'pointer' attri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71924
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
On second thought, the right fix is to report the problem consistently for all
kinds of storage, including auto variables, alloca-ted storage, and compound
literals.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78231
--- Comment #2 from Alfredo ---
@Jonathan, Can you link to the part of the line in the standard? I found that
standard to be very vague, for example in defining ValueSwappable. Is
ValueSwappable something that can be called with `std::iter_swap`,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78246
Bug ID: 78246
Summary: Incorrect vector variable set but not used warning
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78246
--- Comment #1 from Zoltan Hidvegi ---
Created attachment 39986
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39986&action=edit
gcc -O2 -S -Wall warning_test.C gives incorrect warning: variable ‘sm’ set but
not used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72803
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
In cp_lexer_new_main() we read all the tokens from the preprocessor:
/* Get the remaining tokens from the preprocessor. */
while (token.type != CPP_EOF)
{
cp_lexer_get_preprocessor_token (lexer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #34 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 39987
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39987&action=edit
A test program
Just ran some tests comparing reference results and results using -Ofast.
-Ofast does reorder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78231
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See 17.6.3.2 [swappable.requirements]. ValueSwappable is defined in terms of
swappable, which is defined in terms of swappable with, which is defined in
terms of an unqualified call to swap. It has nothing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78231
--- Comment #4 from Alfredo ---
ok, thanks for the clarification.
So algorithms on iterators that swap use `::std::iter_swap`? (I didn't know
that.) That is step forward.
Is then one allowed to overload/specialize `std::iter_swap`? Just like o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78231
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The correct way to implement swap for your own type is to overload it in your
type's namespace, and it will be found by ADL.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11562/how-to-overload-stdswap
http://stackover
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78247
Bug ID: 78247
Summary: Unused inline function returning u32string causes
u32string debuginfo to be emitted.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78059
--- Comment #6 from Bernhard Heckel ---
Ping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78247
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think this is anything we can fix for dwarf2; maybe for dwarf4 (or 5)
with split debugging.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Monat ---
(In reply to Tim Shen from comment #2)
> I proposed another way to fix this in the list:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2016-11/msg8.html
Looks perfect - I was somewhat annoyed by the _M_match() c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
Robert Schiele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rschiele at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67738
Robert Schiele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |
Target Milestone|---
101 - 146 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
