[Bug fortran/67564] Segfault on sourced allocattion statement with class(*) arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67564 --- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Nov 5 07:11:24 2016 New Revision: 241869 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241869&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-05 Paul Thomas PR fortran/67564 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/67564] Segfault on sourced allocattion statement with class(*) arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67564 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78217] Duplicate decls handling with auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78217 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Similar testcase without auto, but in a template: template int foo () { extern int a; extern T a; return a; } template int bar () { extern int b; extern T b; return b; } int c = foo (); int d

[Bug libitm/78202] declarations of builtins in libitm don't match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78202 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger --- The log file of the libitm testsuite is totally cluttered because it is not using -fno-diagnostics-color=never. This happens only for: libitm.c++/throwdown.C libitm.c++/dropref.C Other tests are unaffected

[Bug libitm/78202] declarations of builtins in libitm don't match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78202 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- libitm.c++/throwdown.C is fixable, as it does not need the internal functions from libitm.h: Index: testsuite/libitm.c++/throwdown.C === --- t

[Bug c++/78193] [7 regression] g++.dg/concepts/inherit-ctor3.C etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78193 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc-sun-solaris2.12 |sparc-sun-solaris2.12,

[Bug tree-optimization/78121] [7 Regression] ice in set_value_range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78121 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- (In reply to kugan from comment #4) > Created attachment 39904 [details] > untested patch > > testing this patch patch any good ?

[Bug tree-optimization/78121] [7 Regression] ice in set_value_range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78121 --- Comment #6 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #5) > (In reply to kugan from comment #4) > > Created attachment 39904 [details] > > untested patch > > > > testing this patch > > patch any good ? Poste

[Bug c++/78193] [7 regression] g++.dg/concepts/inherit-ctor3.C etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78193 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- 7896267da348b7e9f4e8c930f2b3fa41577ebf45 is the first bad commit git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@241765 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

[Bug fortran/69495] unused-label warning does not tell which flag triggered it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69495 --- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sat Nov 5 10:35:23 2016 New Revision: 241870 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241870&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-05 Janus Weil Manuel Lopez-Ibanez

[Bug fortran/69495] unused-label warning does not tell which flag triggered it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69495 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/78219] New: [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219 Bug ID: 78219 Summary: [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in the header Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug fortran/78219] [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- My version of the Fortran 2008 standard has: R752 forall-header is ( [ type-spec :: ] forall-triplet-spec-list [, scalar-mask-expr ] ) and C735 (R752) type-spec shall specify type integer. Actu

[Bug bootstrap/78188] [7 Regression] AIX Bootstrap broken by tree-vrp.c change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78188 --- Comment #25 from David Edelsohn --- Author: dje Date: Sat Nov 5 13:06:08 2016 New Revision: 241871 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241871&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-05 Richard Biener PR bootstrap/78188 * g++.dg/

[Bug fortran/78219] [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/78203] missing warning on return of unitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78203 --- Comment #2 from fwd --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > There is a duplicate for this, we perform optimistic constant propagation > which > makes i == 1 and eliminates the conditional uninitialized use very early. Well, with o

[Bug middle-end/78203] missing warning on return of unitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78203 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi

[Bug target/71124] Compiler enters infinite loop on Microblaze with -O1/-O2/-O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71124 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Petazzoni --- Created attachment 39970 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39970&action=edit Another test case demonstration the problem This additional test case comes from ffmpeg 3.2. This file build

[Bug fortran/78219] [F08] specifying the kind of a FORALL index in the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78219 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/77848] Gimple if-conversion results in redundant comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77848 --- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt --- SPEC cpu2006 on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with the simple patch: Geomean, integer: +0.2% Geomean, float:+0.5% Geomean, overall: +0.4% Notable improvements: 454.calculix:+3.7% 453.povray:

[Bug bootstrap/78220] New: Add 'remounting exec' suggestion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78220 Bug ID: 78220 Summary: Add 'remounting exec' suggestion Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug c++/71826] [7 Regression] ICE on valid C++ code with ambiguous member lookup: tree check: expected baselink, have error_mark in tsubst_baselink, at cp/pt.c:13737

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71826 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/77259] [6/7 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn since r232167

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77259 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/77377] [7 Regression] c-c++-common/pr59037.c ICEs with -fpic -msse on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77377 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77482] [6 Regression] Segfault when compiling ill-formed constexpr code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77482 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7 Regression]

[Bug c++/77651] [7 Regression] c++ -Wno-aligned-new ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77651 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/78220] Add 'remounting exec' suggestion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78220 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/70795] [7 Regression] gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:1948:1: ICE: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug ipa/70795] [7 Regression] gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:1948:1: ICE: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- I tend to think so but I don't have another way to duplicate. -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug rtl-optimization/70902] GCC freezes while compiling for 'skylake-avx512' target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70902 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Summ

[Bug target/71555] ICE: compilation "never" finishes with -O -mtune=sandybridge -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71555 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7 Regression] ICE: |ICE: compilation "never"

[Bug bootstrap/6879] cross build of ada - gnatlib_and_tools fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6879 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/78188] [7 Regression] AIX Bootstrap broken by tree-vrp.c change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78188 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, rejects-valid Status|

[Bug target/77957] [6/7 Regression] Undefined .LCTOC0 with -fstack-protector-strong -mminimal-toc -O0 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- This has been worked around on the trunk, but I haven't tracked status of the actual bugfix (making sure that if we don't optimize away the .LCTOC0 reference, we emit that symbol). Segher, do you remember if

[Bug c/78183] Silence warnings about alternate forms of custom format specifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78183 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal

[Bug libgcj/38867] [Regression] gcc 4.4.0 20090114 - libjava/configure sets "NONE/share/python", need "${prefix}/share/python"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38867 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/45556] Add PPL and CLooG-PPL source to gcc source tree for build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45556 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/53798] [4.7] Bootstrap fails on Linux x86_64 with pre-built libmpc/mpfr/gmp due to multilib path problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53798 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/49555] libjava fails to configure if --enable-symvers=gnu or --enable-symvers=sun

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/70165] build failure in libgcj-6.0.0.jar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70165 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/10802] Bootstrap of gcc-3.3 on Solaris 9 x86 fails on undefined symbol in libgcj.so

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10802 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78203] missing warning on return of unitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78203 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- > In my opinion, the warning should be given Nobody contradicted you, we agree that it would be good to issue the warning. We already know about this issue (there are duplicates you can search for in bugzilla)

[Bug c++/66297] [C++14] [DR 1684] constexpr non-static member functions of non-literal types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66297 --- Comment #2 from mati865 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to mati865 from comment #1) > Still affects GCC 6.2. Seems resolved with current trunk (GCC 7.0.0).

[Bug c++/66297] [C++14] [DR 1684] constexpr non-static member functions of non-literal types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66297 --- Comment #3 from mati865 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to mati865 from comment #2) > (In reply to mati865 from comment #1) > > Still affects GCC 6.2. > > Seems resolved with current trunk (GCC 7.0.0). EDIT: It's only partially fixed, example

[Bug fortran/78221] New: [6 Regression] bogus warning: Non-zero imaginary part discarded in conversion [-Wconversion]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78221 Bug ID: 78221 Summary: [6 Regression] bogus warning: Non-zero imaginary part discarded in conversion [-Wconversion] Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/78221] [6 Regression] bogus warning: Non-zero imaginary part discarded in conversion [-Wconversion]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78221 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mexas at bristol dot ac.uk ---

[Bug c++/78039] [6 Regression] fails to compile glibc tests with invalid flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78039 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sat Nov 5 20:08:25 2016 New Revision: 241876 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241876&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/78039 - fails to compile glibc tests gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * c

[Bug c++/78039] [6 Regression] fails to compile glibc tests with invalid flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78039 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77957] [6/7 Regression] Undefined .LCTOC0 with -fstack-protector-strong -mminimal-toc -O0 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77957 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- It is on my "stage3" list.

[Bug bootstrap/45556] Add PPL and CLooG-PPL source to gcc source tree for build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45556 --- Comment #2 from Tom Browder --- Thank you!

[Bug fortran/78221] [6/7 Regression] bogus warning: Non-zero imaginary part discarded in conversion [-Wconversion]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78221 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/64735] std::future broken on armel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735 Pauli changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suokkos at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 from Pau

[Bug target/78199] [PowerPC] Missing optimization for local-exec TLS model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78199 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug middle-end/78201] [7 Regression] ICE in tree_to_shwi, at tree.h:4037 (seen both on ARM32 an AArch64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78201 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78218] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78218 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug c/71115] [5/6 Regression] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 --- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor --- Fix backported to 6-branch in r241877.

[Bug tree-optimization/78218] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78218 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/71115] [5/6 Regression] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 --- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sat Nov 5 23:57:13 2016 New Revision: 241878 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241878&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/71115 - [5/6 Regression] Missing warning: excess elements in struct

[Bug c/71115] [5/6 Regression] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77527] [7 Regression] ICE: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1311 with -mstringop-strategy=libcall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77527 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/77538] segmentation fault: thread sanitizer shadow stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538 --- Comment #14 from peien luo --- (In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #12) > The crash in gdb looks like stack overflow (unsurprising if there are 1MB > frames). Does increasing thread stack size or reducing frame size (there > must somethin

[Bug sanitizer/77538] segmentation fault: thread sanitizer shadow stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- 0x7f224dab0637 <+23>:sub$0x1000f8,%rsp 0x7fc63563a72d <+29>:sub$0x1000e8,%rsp We actually use less stack memory with 4.9 so it looks like it was accidently working on 4.8.