[Bug tree-optimization/78035] Inconsistency between address comparison and alias analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78035 krister.walfridsson at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krister.walfridsson

[Bug c/78190] New: ice in get_alias_type_for_stmts

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 39948 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39948&action=edit C source code The attached code, when compiled by gcc dated 20161102, with compiler flag -O

[Bug c/78190] ice in get_alias_type_for_stmts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78190 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 39949 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39949&action=edit C source code After creduce

[Bug debug/78191] [7 regression] ICE in calc_die_sizes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78191 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug debug/78191] New: [7 regression] ICE in calc_die_sizes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78191 Bug ID: 78191 Summary: [7 regression] ICE in calc_die_sizes Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug tree-optimization/78190] [7 Regression] ice in get_alias_type_for_stmts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78190 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/77993] [7 regression] bootstrap failure on PowerPC/Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77993 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/77993] [7 regression] bootstrap failure on PowerPC/Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77993 --- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 39951 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39951&action=edit Patch to disable IFmode if -msoft-float I believe this patch fixes the problem. It disables IFmode if -msof

[Bug bootstrap/77993] [7 regression] bootstrap failure on PowerPC/Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77993 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > Eric, if you could try it in your environment to see if it solves the > problem, it would be helpful. Will do tomorrow morning.

[Bug bootstrap/78188] [7 Regression] AIX Bootstrap broken by tree-vrp.c change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78188 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/78188] [7 Regression] AIX Bootstrap broken by tree-vrp.c change

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78188 --- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn --- I built the GCC stage1 with and without the tree-vrp.c patch. Same sources, same revision, same directory. cc1plus.good and cc1plus.bad. Then I used both versions of cc1plus to compile tree-ssa-sccvn.c wit

[Bug c++/69967] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored being ignored for -Wunused-variable in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69967 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to gnuBSt from comment #4) > PS. Any development on this issue? This is fixed in GCC >= 6.0 and it doesn't seem critical enough to bother fixing it in GCC 5.4. It should probably be closed.

[Bug target/78192] New: extract from vector registers to int results in wrong data order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78192 Bug ID: 78192 Summary: extract from vector registers to int results in wrong data order Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/78192] extract from vector registers to int results in wrong data order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78192 --- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- This fails even at -O0 or -O1 optimization: /home/sawdey/src/gcc/trunk2/build/gcc/xgcc -B/home/sawdey/src/gcc/trunk2/build/gcc/ /home/sawdey/src/gcc/trunk2/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/exec

[Bug middle-end/78180] Poor optimization of std::array on gcc 4.8/5.4/6.2 as compared to simple raw array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78180 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Does -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 change the code or not? I don't know if we want to change any of the old ABI code ...

[Bug tree-optimization/78180] Poor optimization of std::array on gcc 4.8/5.4/6.2 as compared to simple raw array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78180 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization --- Comment #6 from An

[Bug tree-optimization/78180] Poor optimization of std::array on gcc 4.8/5.4/6.2 as compared to simple raw array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78180 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- By moving the array to be end of struct Rolling, GCC does the correct thing and optimizing out the load of idx out of the loop. That is: template class Rolling { uint32_t idx_; const uint32_t size_;

[Bug c/78181] unrecognized option -mcpu=cortex-a73

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78181 Airbak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug fortran/78062] sinus and cosinus fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78062 --- Comment #4 from Miquel --- Sorry for the delay. fortran version: GNU Fortran (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.2) 5.4.0 20160609 Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.2' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/shar

<    1   2