https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77853
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #6 from Antonio Poggiali ---
Hi all.
any news?
>> This looks like a libc/loader issue to me.
I agree. Is this the correct tracker for this kind of bugs or should I open a
defect on another tracker?
Thanks a lot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77855
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77808
Doug Gilmore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77858
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
The standard says
"Requires: rho shall be non-negative and non-NaN. theta shall be finite."
(I wasn't in favor of it, seems gratuitous, but if you want to complain about
the standard, this isn't the right place
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55152
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 5 07:48:24 2016
New Revision: 240770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240770&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-05 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/55152
* mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77817
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77411
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77759
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77859
Bug ID: 77859
Summary: Ofast needed in presence of conditional code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77844
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77808
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77843
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66343
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77849
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77848
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> We can likely invalidate the cached information, but ISTM that there's a
> reasonable chance we're going to be playing whack-a-mole with this stuff.
Unfortunat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77512
--- Comment #11 from michael at mijobe dot org ---
I used contrib/download_prerequisites to install the required versions of GMP,
MPFR, MPC and ISL:
gmp-4.3.2
isl-0.15
mpc-0.8.1
mpfr-2.4.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77855
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77860
Bug ID: 77860
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in gimple_build_assign_1, at
gimple.c:420
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77844
--- Comment #4 from graeser at mi dot fu-berlin.de ---
I'm sorry a typo slipped into the report. You need '-O3 -g' to trigger the
error. '-O3' or '-g' alone both work nicely.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77861
Bug ID: 77861
Summary: GO and Mac OS X : configure impossible
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77859
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77842
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 5 09:36:27 2016
New Revision: 240774
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240774&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-05 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/77842
* gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77859
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente ---
Thanks for the fast response
I think I can "survive" with -O3 -fno-trapping-math
in principle it should not change the binary compatibility of the output w/r/t
-O2
and at best of my understanding it doe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77842
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66343
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|pch |sanitizer
--- Comment #5 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77858
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77825
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77844
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77844
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Tested command: timeout 10 g++ pr77844.cpp -O3 -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77817
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Yeah, I think this one's WONTFIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66343
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77817
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
> Yeah, I think this one's WONTFIX.
Well, in theory we could for the comments that satisfy fallthrough_comment_p
create CPP_COMMENT token and insert it, even witho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77862
Bug ID: 77862
Summary: ice in add_equivalence
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77826
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77826
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 5 11:38:59 2016
New Revision: 240776
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240776&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-05 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/77826
* gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77863
Bug ID: 77863
Summary: genmatch segfault on a wrong usage of an for operator
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77864
Bug ID: 77864
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] Wrong exception specification on
maps and sets
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77864
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77863
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 5 11:58:25 2016
New Revision: 240777
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240777&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-05 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/77863
* gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77862
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70101
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 5 12:01:57 2016
New Revision: 240781
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 70101 fix allocator-extended ctors for std::priority_queue
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70564
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 5 12:01:36 2016
New Revision: 240778
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240778&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 70564 disambiguate constructors for not_fn call wrapper
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77864
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 5 12:01:51 2016
New Revision: 240780
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240780&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
77864 Fix noexcept conditions for map/set default constructors
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822
--- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes, combine should avoid forming patterns that can never match. It already
does that in many cases. Where does it form this one?
And yes, the target should not allow patterns it has no instruction f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77861
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77843
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
No, my latest tree was at 240740. I didn't find a PR, was there one?
Testing with current trunk now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77847
--- Comment #1 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Wed Oct 5 12:36:48 2016
New Revision: 240783
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240783&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libcpp/ChangeLog:
2016-10-04 Kelvin Nilsen
PR tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77861
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||socnet.delphin at laposte dot
net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77847
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70564
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 5 12:40:31 2016
New Revision: 240784
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240784&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
70564 fix newly-added tests for not_fn
PR libstdc++/70564
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70564
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 5 12:42:48 2016
New Revision: 240786
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240786&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 70564 disambiguate constructor for not_fn call wrapper
PR lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69095
--- Comment #6 from Tony E Lewis ---
For information: mine is now fixed too.
More detail: my example that was previously triggering this Internal Compiler
Error on GCC 5.2.1 now gets sensible error messages under "gcc HEAD 7.0.0
20161004" on htt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77848
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Thanks, Richard! I appreciate the analysis, as I wasn't really sure what the
proper fix should be here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70101
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 5 13:43:49 2016
New Revision: 240788
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240788&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 70101 fix allocator-extended ctors for std::priority_queue
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70101
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|ASSIG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70564
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 5 13:51:03 2016
New Revision: 240790
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240790&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 70564 disambiguate constructor for not_fn call wrapper
PR lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77864
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70564
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77864
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 5 13:43:44 2016
New Revision: 240787
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240787&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
77864 Fix noexcept conditions for map/set default constructors
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77864
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Oct 5 13:43:58 2016
New Revision: 240789
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240789&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
77864 Fix noexcept conditions for map/set default constructors
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77865
Bug ID: 77865
Summary: Regression: wrong debug information for gfortran
pointers to structures
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77858
--- Comment #3 from Holger Seelig ---
Thanks for your response I have looked into c++config.h and figured out that
__glibcxx_assert depends on the definition of_GLIBCXX_PARALLEL, that I have
defined. Probably better for me not to use this defini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77866
Bug ID: 77866
Summary: Add SystemTap probe points to libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77819
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77837
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77867
Bug ID: 77867
Summary: Internal compiler error, array in write format
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77817
--- Comment #7 from jim at meyering dot net ---
Thanks for investigating.
I already pushed a workaround for gnulib's vasnprintf problem
(http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=e63f5eb55570a1ea3e51ce47df33689785e085c1).
I may just l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77868
Bug ID: 77868
Summary: Fail to NULL guard check for internal unit in
inquire_via_unit
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77868
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77858
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77819
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Oct 5 15:21:40 2016
New Revision: 240793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/77819 - undefined reference to gnu_libc_printf_pointer_format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77869
Bug ID: 77869
Summary: ICE on a code piece
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71856
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71856
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This should ensure __glibcxx_assert() is empty unless _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS is
defined, but _GLIBCXX_PARALLEL_ASSERT() still expands to an assertion.
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/c++config
+++ b/libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77870
Bug ID: 77870
Summary: Valid OpenMP reduction of allocatable array produces a
warning with -Wrealloc-lhs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77828
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Just need to edit the trunk/libgfortran/libtool-version file, bumping the major
rev number and build from a clean build directory. I have tested this and it
works fine. I want to see if we are going to get t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77868
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Oct 5 16:32:24 2016
New Revision: 240794
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240794&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-05 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/77868
* io/inq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77785
--- Comment #4 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Indeed, case from comment 0 is fixed now.
Still pending :
$ cat z2.f90
module m
type t
real, allocatable :: a
end type
contains
subroutine s(x)
class(t) :: x[*]
allocate (x%a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77785
--- Comment #5 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Related :
$ cat z4.f90
module m
type t
real, allocatable :: a(:)
end type
contains
subroutine s(x)
class(t) :: x[*]
allocate (x%a(2))
end
end
$ cat z5.f90
module m
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66709
--- Comment #4 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Update :
$ gfortran-7-20161002 z_wr_fmt_ice_1.f90
z_wr_fmt_ice_1.f90:4:0:
read (*, fmt=fmt) n
internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_array_constructor_expr, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:6748
0x763769 g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77871
Bug ID: 77871
Summary: ICE in gfc_get_caf_token_offset, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:1981
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77872
Bug ID: 77872
Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_token, at
fortran/trans-array.c:305
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77873
Bug ID: 77873
Summary: ICE in gfc_is_class_scalar_expr, at
fortran/class.c:380
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77823
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Oct 5 17:47:34 2016
New Revision: 240796
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240796&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/77823
* c-ubsan.c (ubsan_instrument_shift): R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77874
Bug ID: 77874
Summary: two problems with gcc.target/i386/avx-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67524
--- Comment #5 from lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: lkrupp
Date: Wed Oct 5 18:00:30 2016
New Revision: 240797
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240797&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-05 Louis Krupp
PR fortran/67524
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67524
lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77824
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77862
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77862
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r240291.
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
