https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77399
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 30 07:06:16 2016
New Revision: 240646
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240646&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77399
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77798
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77798
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 39726
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39726&action=edit
Reduced test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77798
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77399
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Load part remains.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77798
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, looks like a genmatch insufficiency with type auto-detection.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77602
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77603
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77801
Bug ID: 77801
Summary: std::experimental::gcd std::experimental::lcd use
non-constexpr std::abs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080
--- Comment #16 from Mueller ---
I stumbled upon this problem when creating an object-oriented string class if I
remember correctly. Some procedure would allocate a string and return it (like
dummy_create_allocatable in the test prog). The callin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77801
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77801
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67200
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77797
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ shows the active releases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fritzoreese at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77802
Bug ID: 77802
Summary: [7 Regression] Boost Fiber doesn't compile
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77802
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77785
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584
--- Comment #8 from foreese at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #7)
> You need to use your @gnu.gcc.org account to be able to modify BZs.
Oh, thanks. Seems obvious now that I think about it. I didn't realize such an
acc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47779
--- Comment #7 from Waldemar Brodkorb ---
I fixed it in uClibc-ng some time ago. So if you want you can
close the ticket.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77782
--- Comment #3 from foreese at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: foreese
Date: Fri Sep 30 11:37:23 2016
New Revision: 240651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240651&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Fritz Reese
Fix ICE caused by union types com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77782
foreese at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77802
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
17.6.4.8 [res.on.functions] p2
In particular, the effects are undefined in the following cases:
...
— if an incomplete type (3.9) is used as a template argument when instantiating
a template component, unl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77764
--- Comment #3 from foreese at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: foreese
Date: Fri Sep 30 11:42:31 2016
New Revision: 240652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Fritz Reese
Fix ICE for maps with zero compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77801
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Schneider ---
Of course:
[...]
/home/vcs/VideoSDK/vcs-base/include/vcsbase/Time.h:122:203: in constexpr
expansion of ‘vcsbase::Time::FromInt(ticks, (uncertaintyInTicks / 90u), 0l,
((int64_t)ticksPerMs))’
/home/vcs/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77764
foreese at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77801
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Schneider ---
Isn't it also obvious that calling a non-constexpr function from a constexpr
function will not work when actually using it as a constexpr?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77802
--- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77802
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77801
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|WAITI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77801
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Sep 30 13:43:37 2016
New Revision: 240656
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240656&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove use of std::abs in experimental::{gcd,lcm}
PR libstdc++/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77803
Bug ID: 77803
Summary: Bogus implicit-fallthrough warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77804
Bug ID: 77804
Summary: Internal compiler error on incorrect initialization of
new-d array
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Sep 30 15:50:31 2016
New Revision: 240659
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240659&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77803
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77807
Bug ID: 77807
Summary: Problem with for loop condition
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77807
Antoine Sauma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71799
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Sep 30 16:58:31 2016
New Revision: 240668
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240668&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77807
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Sep 30 17:21:26 2016
New Revision: 240669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/31566
* gcc.c (process_command): For @filename hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77794
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77670
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Sep 30 17:29:56 2016
New Revision: 240670
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240670&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #20 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Sep 30 17:54:15 2016
New Revision: 240671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77808
Bug ID: 77808
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_ptr_info, at
tree-ssanames.c:630 starting with r240439
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77733
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77804
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77808
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77733
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #5)
> IMO the near match is misplaced. What follows the 'candidate:' should be a
> C++ declaration.
Why? Is that a policy or just opinion?
> However, this is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77795
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Sep 30 18:28:53 2016
New Revision: 240672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240672&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/77795 Only declare ::gets for C++98 and C++11
PR libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77801
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Sep 30 18:29:16 2016
New Revision: 240673
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240673&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove use of std::abs in experimental::{gcd,lcm}
PR libstdc++/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77795
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Sep 30 18:29:24 2016
New Revision: 240674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/77795 Only declare ::gets for C++98 and C++11
PR libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77795
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68323
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77725
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77801
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77351
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Sep 30 19:21:12 2016
New Revision: 240678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Steven g. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77803
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Testing a fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77809
Bug ID: 77809
Summary: "_LITTLE_ENDIAN" redefined
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77810
Bug ID: 77810
Summary: provide format_inform_at_substring to go with
format_warning_at_substring
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77810
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 39727
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39727&action=edit
Prototype patch.
I tested the attached proof-of-concept patch by integrating it into the
gimple-ssa-sprintf pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77811
Bug ID: 77811
Summary: [concepts] invalid redefinition error when declaring
friend function
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756
--- Comment #12 from Yale Zhang ---
What's the purpose of subleaf? Is it to distinguish the capabilities of
different cores in a heterogeneous chip (e.g. ARM big-little)?
Then I would be fine with making this an extra parameter to __get_cpuid().
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69962
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Sep 30 21:02:56 2016
New Revision: 240679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69867
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Sep 30 21:02:56 2016
New Revision: 240679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71859
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Sep 30 21:46:14 2016
New Revision: 240682
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240682&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-11-22 00:00:00 |2016-9-30
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm going to commit a workaround in so I don't do this again.
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex.h
@@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
templat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61318
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Sep 30 22:40:18 2016
New Revision: 240683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-30 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58669
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12788
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61552
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18131
Bug 18131 depends on bug 12788, which changed state.
Bug 12788 Summary: bad dependencies for inner classes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12788
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18212
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41361
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49077
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46324
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41549
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50936
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24454
Bug 24454 depends on bug 10632, which changed state.
Bug 10632 Summary: Numerical result differs from Sun JDK -- strictfp not
supported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10632
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13885
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11623
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10632
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35206
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8709
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58689
Bug 58689 depends on bug 24825, which changed state.
Bug 24825 Summary: Standard runtime methods that are known to not return null
should not trigger null checks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24825
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16843
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20044
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24825
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27027
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 434 matches
Mail list logo
