https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Looks like tree-ssa-pre.c also needs to be guarded:
0x10c3a273 crash_signal
../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:337
0x10f30e2c eliminate_dom_walker::before_dom_children(basic_block_def*)
../../gcc/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 29 07:15:13 2016
New Revision: 240610
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240610&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77789
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, trippels at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
>
> --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
> Looks like tree-ssa-pre.c also nee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
--- Comment #5 from Georg Koppen ---
No, it is still broken after applying the patch to 6.2.0:
../src/c++11/.libs/libc++11convenience.a(debug.o): In function
`format_word':
/home/ubuntu/build/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/../../../
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77788
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66297
--- Comment #1 from mati865 at gmail dot com ---
Still affects GCC 6.2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> For level >= 7, ECX may have other input values. It is incorrect to
> assume that ECX only takes 0 or 1. We should get another macro for
> level >= 7 with input for ECX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77792
Bug ID: 77792
Summary: Generic lamdba scope issue when working with
list::remove_if
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77793
Bug ID: 77793
Summary: GNAT Bug Box when using the "&" operator from
Ada.Containers.Vectors on inline uses of expression
functions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77793
--- Comment #1 from Lars Schulna ---
Using record types is mandatory as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77763
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77300
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@linux-mips.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77300
--- Comment #3 from James Cowgill ---
$ mipsel-linux-gnu-readelf -r src.o
Relocation section '.rel.text' at offset 0x584 contains 6 entries:
Offset InfoTypeSym.Value Sym. Name
1005 R_MIPS_HI16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77794
Bug ID: 77794
Summary: libstdc++ doesn't bootstrap with ./cofnigure
--enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77765
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70932
Carlos Tripiana Montes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tripiana at gmail dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77795
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77795
Bug ID: 77795
Summary: [6/7 Regression] ::gets declared in C++14 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77782
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77783
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77785
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77786
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77790
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77791
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71952
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77785
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61056
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=240568
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77792
--- Comment #1 from Michele Caini ---
See also this question on SO: http://stackoverflow.com/q/39766467/4987285
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55152
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 29 12:27:19 2016
New Revision: 240615
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240615&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/55152
* mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77407
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55152
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77407
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 29 12:28:19 2016
New Revision: 240616
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240616&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/77407
* mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 29 12:31:02 2016
New Revision: 240617
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240617&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77792
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77792
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The minimal example from an SO answer:
template
struct S {
template static void f();
S() { void(*g)(char) = [](auto) { f<0>; }; }
};
S<0> s;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77788
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77745
Bug 77745 depends on bug 77768, which changed state.
Bug 77768 Summary: [7 Regression] LTO/PGO -O3 bootstrap broken:
tree-vrp.c:11053:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77794
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-gnu-linux|
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77795
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77794
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77796
Bug ID: 77796
Summary: tautological compare warning emitted for inherited
static method comparisons
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77782
--- Comment #2 from Fritz Reese ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-09/msg00189.html
Patch submitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77764
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fritzoreese at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70932
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Sorry, I haven't gotten to it yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77788
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
It seems that few of us do profiledbootstrap during development so warnings
tend to creep in and go unnoticed. Would it make sense to detect the missing
--disable-werror during configuration and print a big w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Level 7 returns the maximum input value in EAX with ECX == 0.
Level 9 and 10 don't use ECX as input.
Level 11 takes ECX[7:0] as input level number.
Level 13 takes many values in ECX as input.
There is no fixe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77300
--- Comment #4 from Maciej W. Rozycki ---
Thanks. I didn't expect -W would be required for non-truncated output,
however at this stage it looks anyway like it's GAS which is at fault,
because the GOT16 relocation at 0xcc isn't reordered (in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> Level 7 returns the maximum input value in EAX with ECX == 0.
> Level 9 and 10 don't use ECX as input.
> Level 11 takes ECX[7:0] as input level number.
> Level 13 takes m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538
--- Comment #7 from peien luo ---
tried, still got D state, build with gcc 4.9.4
[god@localhost 21586]$ cat stack
[] do_exit+0x1e4/0xa60
[] do_group_exit+0x3f/0xa0
[] get_signal_to_deliver+0x1d0/0x6d0
[] do_signal+0x57/0x6c0
[] do_notify_resume+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77793
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77300
James Cowgill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
At the end of the day, it looks that we want simply an additional version of
__get_cpuid where sub-leaf can be specified - a variant of HJ's proposal:
--cut here--
/* Return cpuid data for requested cpuid leaf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9)
> At the end of the day, it looks that we want simply an additional version of
> __get_cpuid where sub-leaf can be specified - a variant of HJ's proposal:
>
> --cut here-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77797
Bug ID: 77797
Summary: Unable to use constexpr function as constexpr template
parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77797
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 29 18:08:05 2016
New Revision: 240627
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240627&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77797
--- Comment #2 from Vyacheslav ---
Then why there's no such info at GCC 4.9 news page?
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/
I would not submit the bug if I knew that the version was abandoned.
Please fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69514
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 29 18:35:49 2016
New Revision: 240628
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240628&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
Chris Green changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greenc at fnal dot gov
--- Comment #28 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Sep 29 18:44:32 2016
New Revision: 240629
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/77756
* config/i386/cpuid.h (__get_cpui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77260
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 29 19:34:59 2016
New Revision: 240635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 29 19:34:59 2016
New Revision: 240635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67200
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77506
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 29 20:32:22 2016
New Revision: 240636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77507
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 29 20:32:22 2016
New Revision: 240636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27077
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77460
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 29 22:09:42 2016
New Revision: 240640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77420
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 29 22:09:42 2016
New Revision: 240640
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240640&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77798
Bug ID: 77798
Summary: 465.tonto ICE with trunk with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77799
Bug ID: 77799
Summary: missing -Wformat-length warning on a trivial sprintf
overflow with no directives
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77584
--- Comment #4 from Fritz Reese ---
Yes, fixed in r240230, I can't change the bug status myself or I would've
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-09/msg00105.html
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 21:06 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77800
Bug ID: 77800
Summary: Undefined ref to host_detect_local_cpu on netbsd/arm
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Sep 30 04:49:36 2016
New Revision: 240645
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240645&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-29 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
;; Function void Sublime::Area::qt_static_metacall() (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original
{
typedef struct _t _t;
if (1B->__pfn == ((struct _t) {.__pfn=viewAdded, .__delta=0}).__pfn &&
(1B->__delt
84 matches
Mail list logo
