https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Bug ID: 0
Summary: Internal compiler error on source which compiles with
earlier versions.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
--- Comment #1 from Zoltan Kocsi ---
Created attachment 39709
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39709&action=edit
The error message from the compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
--- Comment #2 from Zoltan Kocsi ---
Created attachment 39710
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39710&action=edit
The pre-compiled source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77769
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The testcase you attached can't work because we can't inline an avx2 function
into a function not having avx2 enabled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
Robert Luberda changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robert-gcc at debian dot org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77761
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77756
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
0x10c39b13 crash_signal
../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:337
0x10f818d8 visit_reference_op_store
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c:3613
0x10f818d8 visit_use
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c:385
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
So it looks like r240534 is causing this issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
--- Comment #27 from Andrew Church ---
I've updated the undeprecation patch at http://achurch.org/patch-pile/#gcc for
4.9.4 and 6.2.0 (sorry about laziness).
I'm mildly amused at how the quotation style ('...' vs `...') and line wrap
column in t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Bug ID: 1
Summary: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_bit_field_ref, at
cp/constexpr.c:2090
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Interesting. This means vnresult is NULL. I see we can arrive here through
tree
vn_reference_lookup (tree op, tree vuse, vn_lookup_kind kind,
vn_reference_t *vnresult, bool tbaa_p)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
Bug ID: 2
Summary: Segmentation fault when running an application with
gdb
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Poggiali ---
Created attachment 39713
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39713&action=edit
Logs, command line and temp file with GCC 4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Poggiali ---
Created attachment 39714
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39714&action=edit
Source files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Poggiali ---
Created attachment 39715
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39715&action=edit
Logs of the cross-compiled program segmentation fault with gdb attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77769
--- Comment #3 from Yale Zhang ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> The testcase you attached can't work because we can't inline an avx2
> function into a function not having avx2 enabled.
Right, but main() and the OpenMP function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(gdb) p vnresult
$1 = (vn_reference_s *) 0x0
(gdb) p debug_tree(lhs)
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-*-linux-gnueabi
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
Bug ID: 3
Summary: [7/6 regression] Segfault when compiling
__simd64_float16_t using arm-none-eabi-g++ with debug
information
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #1 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
When I say without errors I meant without segfaulting. It will print out the
following error for version 5 if you dont include '-mfpu=neon':
t.c:1:9: error: '__simd64_float16_t' does not name a ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #3 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Just to make it clear:
The command I showed without the '-g' did use to error on gcc-5, but it doesnt
on 6 and 7:
$ gcc-5/arm-none-eabi-g++ -S t.c -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv7-a
t.c:1:9: error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
This looks like a libc/loader issue to me. My source points at
/* Initialize _r_debug if it has not already been done. The argument is
the run-time load address of the dynamic linker, to be put in
_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Sep 28 10:57:46 2016
New Revision: 240567
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240567&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/77686 use may_alias for std::function storage
PR libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32650
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com
--- Comment #2 from Wilc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #5 from Antonio Poggiali ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> This looks like a libc/loader issue to me. My source points at
>
> /* Initialize _r_debug if it has not already been done. The argument is
>the run-tim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Bug ID: 4
Summary: Build failure on netbsd-7.0.1/arm6hf of gcc 6.2.0,
7-20160925
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Sep 28 12:03:43 2016
New Revision: 240571
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240571&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/77686 use may_alias for std::function storage
PR libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
>
> Jonathan Wakely changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77748
--- Comment #24 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Wed Sep 28 12:11:57 2016
New Revision: 240573
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240573&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-28 Bernd Edlinger
PR c++/77748
* g++.dg/p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77733
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77707
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #2)
> The configure target used here is armv6--netbsdelf-eabihf (note two dashes
> after armv6)
>
> aarch64-common.o is added to extra_objs in config.gcc
Of c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Bug ID: 5
Summary: [7 Regression] since r238559 Kdevelop gets miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 39718
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39718&action=edit
good assembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 39719
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39719&action=edit
bad assembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
g++ -O0 -fPIC -c moc_area.ii -S -o bad_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Bug ID: 6
Summary: C++17 std::hypot implementation is poor
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Sep 28 12:47:24 2016
New Revision: 240574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/77686 use may_alias for std::function storage
PR libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77411
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Wed Sep 28 12:48:16 2016
New Revision: 240575
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240575&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
backport from mainline
2016-09-23 Bernd Edlinger
Tom de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77399
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Bug ID: 7
Summary: Use rich location to mark correct expression for
"invalid use of non-static member function"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #4 from coypu ---
indeed in EXTRAOBJS I only have netbsd.o
I'll try to use arm*) instead, and will report back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
With:
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -1823,6 +1823,7 @@ invalid_nonstatic_memfn_p (location_t loc, tree expr,
tsubst_flags_t complain)
/* Don't enforce this in MS mode. */
if (flag_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77733
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77733
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> As well as a fixit hint suggesting to use std::move it might be useful to
> display the "" text in colour so it stands out.
Good idea.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ideally we'd look to see if a.foo() would return a type that would make the
call bar( a.foo() ) valid, and not suggest it otherwise (there's no point
suggesting it if a.foo() returns void, for example).
An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77407
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
ble-libmudflap --disable-libquadmath --disable-libssp
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-nls --disable-rda --disable-sid --disable-tui
--disable-utils --disable-werror --disable-fixed-point
Thread model: single
gcc version 7.0.0 20160928 (experimental) (GCC)
% grep -A 2 FAIL build/gcc/testsuite/gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77764
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to coypu from comment #4)
> indeed in EXTRAOBJS I only have netbsd.o
> I'll try to use arm*) instead, and will report back.
netbsd.o (and netbsd.c) don't appear to exist or be referenced anywher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Now that we have another (early) pass things should be even worse. Current
trunk at -O2 with -fno-checking improved though (I guess by means of a cost
model or so):
phase opt and generate : 69.39 (99%)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #6 from coypu ---
It is a local change bug! thanks.
I'll let you know if the build completes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55152
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160928 (experimental) [trunk revision 240565] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:5:5: warning: assignment discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target
type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
c = &a;
^
small.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77768
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Bug ID: 9
Summary: unnecessary trap checks for pointer subtraction with
-ftrapv
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
Jonathan Ross changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.ross at imc dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77385
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718
--- Comment #6 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can confirm that Bernd's patch fixes the issue, bootstraps on powerpc64le,
and does not cause any new regression test failures in "make check".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77780
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77780
Bug ID: 77780
Summary: Go front-end ignores NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jonathan Ross from comment #26)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23)
> > (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #22)
> > > When a fix is designed, could you please backport it t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77753
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Sep 28 16:02:06 2016
New Revision: 240581
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240581&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/77753 - [7 Regression] broken profiledbootstrap due to
gcc/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77781
Bug ID: 77781
Summary: [DR 1315]
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519
--- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Wed Sep 28 16:11:44 2016
New Revision: 240582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240582&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Correct libgcc complex multiply excess precision handling (PR libgcc/775
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77781
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77683
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Sep 28 16:13:12 2016
New Revision: 240583
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240583&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/77683 - ICE on %lf directive in format_floating in
gcc/test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] complex|[5 Regression] complex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77683
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77762
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Sep 28 16:24:35 2016
New Revision: 240584
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240584&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/77762 - Incorrect destination buffer length in -Wformat-length warnin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69976
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Gutson ---
Any update on this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> > There are lots of cases where we should use rich locations, but here's one
> Do you mean a fix-it hint?
I don
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Or maybe even better, make the caret point to the member function, but cover
the entire expression:
x.foo
~~^~~
(Please ignore the "did you mean...?" part shown in the initial comment, that
w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
FWIW the location information is available in the frame above:
Breakpoint 6, invalid_nonstatic_memfn_p (loc=205792, expr=, complain=3)
at ../../src/gcc/cp/typeck.c:1834
1834ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77783
Bug ID: 77783
Summary: ICE in gfc_compare_union_types, at
fortran/interface.c:545
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77783
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Some variations :
$ cat z2.f90
subroutine f(x)
structure /s1/
union
integer i
end union
end structure
record /s1/ x
x.i = 0
end
subroutine g
structure /s1/
union
end un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77784
Bug ID: 77784
Summary: duplicate warning for snprintf for n > object size
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080
--- Comment #14 from Mueller ---
I'd really like to know why this report has been closed although there may be a
problem with deallocation. I think the rephrasing of Mikael pinpointed what I
meant.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77785
Bug ID: 77785
Summary: ICE in gfc_get_caf_token_offset, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:1990
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77782
Bug ID: 77782
Summary: ICE in gfc_get_union_type, at
fortran/trans-types.c:2387
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77762
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519
--- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Wed Sep 28 17:37:45 2016
New Revision: 240586
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240586&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Correct libgcc complex multiply excess precision handling (PR libgcc/775
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77519
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
shows up please open a new bug for it.
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 7.0.0 20160928 (experimental) (powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error: |
| in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5897|
| Error detected around /sr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77784
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
