https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77655
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77655
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Causes a stack overflow in:
#174 0x00ddeefe in dump_type(cxx_pretty_printer*, tree_node*, int) ()
at ../../gcc/cp/error.c:510
#175 0x0061b56d in dump_template_bindings (typenames=0x767e1f2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
>
> --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77657
Bug ID: 77657
Summary: link error with implementation of user-defined derived
type input/output (UD-DTIO) in child extending
abstract parent
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77649
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77654
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Looks good though addr_base should always be a pointer but it might not be an
SSA name so better check that. Patches should go to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
btw.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77653
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |7.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77650
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So maybe document this as an extension (and specify its semantics -- I'm
curious how the glibc code behaves)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
Summary|[4.9/5/6/7 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77647
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77658
Bug ID: 77658
Summary: internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at
function.c:961
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77646
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, this is because we value-number the indirect call result to the result of
the direct call (correctly) but that has no VDEF (it's detected pure) and thus
we fail to value-number the indirect calls VDEF.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57558
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 57558, which changed state.
Bug 57558 Summary: Loop not vectorized if iteration count could be infinite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57558
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57558
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 39653
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39653&action=edit
Target-dependent patch that disables DFmode vectorization via vector costs
Proposed target-dependent patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #9)
> I believe atom _does_ have full SSE2 support, no? Using intrinsics
> (even those expanding to GCC generic vector extension code) should
> end up emitting SSE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63693
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dannix84 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70254
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63693
--- Comment #8 from Yury V. Zaytsev ---
So, not going to be backported to 5.x?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77659
Bug ID: 77659
Summary: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:8858
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77659
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77659
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
on trunk with checking enabled:
markus@x4 tmp % g++ -c m.ii
m.ii: In instantiation of ‘void A::m_fn1() [with =
int]’:
m.ii:10:16: required from here
m.ii:4:29: internal compiler error: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77648
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
struct S { int *p; int *q; };
int **__attribute__((noinline,noclone,pure)) foo (struct S *s)
{
return &s->q;
}
int main()
{
struct S s;
int i = 1, j = 2;
int **x;
s.p = &i;
s.q = &j;
x = foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71952
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, patch submitted as r240231 although it doesn't show here. Waiting one
week for regressions before closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77658
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #11)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #9)
>
> > I believe atom _does_ have full SSE2 support, no? Using intrinsics
> > (even those expanding to GCC gener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77467
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #39559|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77644
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 39656
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39656&action=edit
patch for the ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
--- Comment #14 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> Created attachment 39656 [details]
> patch for the ICE
+/* { dg-additional-options "-march=i686 -mtune=atom -msse2" { target ia32 } }
*/
You can use
/* { dg-a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77660
Bug ID: 77660
Summary: Conversion operator unknown or ambiguous: gcc or clang
behave differently
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77648
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 39657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39657&action=edit
patch in testing
Contains two C testcases -- the Fortran bug is in another code path, a Fortran
testcase suita
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77655
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77661
Bug ID: 77661
Summary: --enable-maintainer-mode causes in-tree-build of MPC
to fail
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> If V2DFmode moves are fine(?) then maybe not do this for the load/store
> kinds - this means only handling vector_stmt this way (and maybe
> vect_promote_demote
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
>
> --- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77661
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Does adding --disable-maintainer-mode to Makefile.def extra_configure_flags for
MPC help?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[5/6/7 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77646
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 20 12:20:37 2016
New Revision: 240261
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240261&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-20 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77646
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
--- Comment #17 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16)
> At least you won't get called for the scalar loop copy and you have
> definite acccess to vectype.
Thanks for the hint, the following patch is effective as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
>
> --- Comment #17 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77653
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77656
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77610
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77661
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Does adding --disable-maintainer-mode to Makefile.def extra_configure_flags
> for MPC help?
Yes, using
--- a/Makefile.def
+++ b/Makefile.def
@@ -65,3 +65,3 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77659
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77661
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01294.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77662
Bug ID: 77662
Summary: arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++: internal compiler error:
Killed (program cgcc)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77662
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77657
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77624
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 20 13:48:40 2016
New Revision: 240263
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240263&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/77624
* builtins.c (fold_builtin_atomic_alwa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77650
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Documenting the semantics of this extension would work, though to be usable
safely, GCC would also need to change to recognize that the nested flexible
array member aliases the subsequent members and treat the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 39659
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39659&action=edit
proposed patch set.
So I think this is working reasonably, but haven't tested fully across the
range of Darwins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77624
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE on |[5/6 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77587
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77642
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 39660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39660&action=edit
Patch proposal
There was another location in proc.c which was in need of a conversion.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77619
--- Comment #3 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Tue Sep 20 15:15:36 2016
New Revision: 240264
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240264&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/77619
* include/bits/stl_construct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77619
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 20 15:17:41 2016
New Revision: 240266
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240266&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77638
* parser.c (cp_parser_template_declaration_af
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77626
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 20 15:18:31 2016
New Revision: 240267
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240267&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77626
* constexpr.c (cxx_fold_indirect_ref): Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63299
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 20 15:19:14 2016
New Revision: 240268
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240268&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/63299
* g++.old-deja/g++.jason/init3.C (My_st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77637
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far, leaving still open for possible backports.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77638
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE on |[6 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77626
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE with |[6 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63299
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77637
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 20 15:16:55 2016
New Revision: 240265
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240265&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77637
* parser.c (cp_parser_std_attribute_list): Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77663
Bug ID: 77663
Summary: libgfortran/caf/single.c: four minor problems
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libfor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #39659|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77664
Bug ID: 77664
Summary: Missed optimization: signed int >= 0 && < unsigned
short
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69481
Akim Demaille changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akim.demaille at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77642
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Sep 20 16:48:19 2016
New Revision: 240275
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240275&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/77642
runtime: pass correct type to __splitstack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77642
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77621
--- Comment #19 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Sep 20 17:36:03 2016
New Revision: 240277
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240277&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/77621
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_prefer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77665
Bug ID: 77665
Summary: ICE in expand_GOMP_SIMD_VF, at internal-fn.c:172
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77625
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Sep 20 17:52:23 2016
New Revision: 240279
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240279&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/77625
compiler: allocate std::ofstream as a loca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77666
Bug ID: 77666
Summary: ICE in gfc_omp_clause_default_ctor, at
fortran/trans-openmp.c:471
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77625
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667
Bug ID: 77667
Summary: ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:2588
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Variants with a type mismatch give a suboptimal error message :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
type t
integer :: a
integer, pointer :: b
end type
type(t) :: x
data x /t(4, f())/
prin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77668
Bug ID: 77668
Summary: register allocation shoud not occupy register for
return value early
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77478
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Monakov ---
Thanks, seeing alignment info in dumps helps (I think you meant -vops rather
than -alias?).
This doesn't seem to reproduce on trunk. On gcc-5 branch, I see alignment
increasing in dom2 pass.
Specificall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66362
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77512
--- Comment #9 from michael at mijobe dot org ---
same result
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77657
--- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson ---
Bravo!
:D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77665
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77666
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77669
Bug ID: 77669
Summary: Incorrect LTO code on embedded ARM
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77670
Bug ID: 77670
Summary: PowerPC64 Spec 2006 fails on 453.povray using
-mcpu=power9 -mpower9-minmax
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77670
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77669
--- Comment #1 from wgh at beyondunreal dot com ---
The loop in question looks like this, in C++ and aseembly:
if (__urngrange > __urange)
{
// downscaling
const __uctype __uerange = __urange + 1; // __ur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77669
--- Comment #2 from wgh at beyondunreal dot com ---
It looks like LTO somehow breaks constructors for static variables. I have no
better idea ATM.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77670
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Sep 20 23:51:01 2016
New Revision: 240294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR 77670
Modified:
branches/ibm/minmax/gcc/ChangeLog.meissn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58589
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71309
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Probably related to PR74585. In both cases we have full stores followed by
partial loads, and DSE isn't able to figure out the store is dead as a result.
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
