https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77351
Bug ID: 77351
Summary: ICE in remove_trim, at frontend-passes.c:1145
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77352
Bug ID: 77352
Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77350
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77351
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77352
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67899
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
Bug ID: 77353
Summary: [AVR] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #5 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz ---
And if you add a new type __float256 with 32-byte alignment - does it mean that
glibc suddenly starts being buggy, because it couldn't anticipate what types
with what alignment will b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77344
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz wrote:
> And if you add a new type __float256 with 32-byte alignment - does it mean
> that
> glibc suddenly starts being buggy,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77344
--- Comment #2 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> I get a lot of "*error: instruction requires: AVX-512 ISA" when compiling
> gettau.F90 on x86_64-apple-darwin15, Xcode 7.3.1.
I've never tried this on Dar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77351
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thou shalt not derefernce NULL pointers.
troutmask:sgk[238] svn diff frontend-passes.c
Index: frontend-passes.c
===
--- frontend-pas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353
--- Comment #1 from Berni ---
another example:
if (PINA < PINC)
{
PORTB = 0;
}
compiles to:
6c2: 20 b1 in r18, 0x00 ; 0
6c4: 86 b1 in r24, 0x06 ; 6
6c6: 30 e0 ldi r19, 0x00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77354
Bug ID: 77354
Summary: Failure with -fno-ivopts
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77333
--- Comment #2 from Keno Fischer ---
Still broken adding both options to the compile.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77336
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 39488
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39488&action=edit
Prototype patch.
Attached a lightly tested patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> gcc assumes that malloc, calloc, realloc, strdup, strndup
> and anything with the __attribute__((__malloc__))
> returns a point
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77336
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327
Fritz Reese changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fritzoreese at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #11)
> And with "kind=4" instead of "kind=1", i.e. with testfile z1.f90 ?
>
>
> for n in `seq 1 1000`
> do
>gfortran-7-20160821 -O2 -mavx -c z1.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77355
Bug ID: 77355
Summary: FAIL: jit.dg/test-threads.c: error: static declaration
of 'dejagnu_pass' follows non-static declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288
--- Comment #7 from Ville Voutilainen ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01634.html for what the
aforementioned superior approach looks like.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #8)
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
>
> > gcc assumes that malloc, calloc, realloc, strdup, strndup
> > and anything with the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77356
Bug ID: 77356
Summary: regex error for a ECMAScript syntax string
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The signed version can be done in four insns:
1: subfc r5,r3,r4
subfe r6,r6,r6
and r7,r6,r5
addcr8,r7,r3
(superopt finds 16 versions, all similar).
The unsign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(Never mind those last "addc" insn, they can just as well be plain
"add", I pasted the wrong ones).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> Yes, but isn't that an ABI decision?
It's the sort of ABI decision that's fixed after it's appeared in a
release (whereas ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77357
Bug ID: 77357
Summary: strlen of constant strings not folded
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77357
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38302
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77358
Bug ID: 77358
Summary: [F08] deferred-length character function returns
zero-length string
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359
Bug ID: 77359
Summary: [7 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to alignment
of stack pointer + STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77360
Bug ID: 77360
Summary: Self-assignment of allocatable character array
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77344
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Component|fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66196
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65068
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-05-15 00:00:00 |2016-8-23
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #10)
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
>
> > Yes, but isn't that an ABI decision?
>
> It's the sort of ABI decision that's fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68561
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68557
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77354
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71602
--- Comment #15 from Tom de Vries ---
Posted updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01691.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69620
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77261
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66022
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77330
--- Comment #12 from Bernd Edlinger ---
glibc's malloc returns 128-bit aligned on x86-64-linux-gnu.
but what does it return on windows?
101 - 150 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
