https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77270
--- Comment #5 from nightstrike ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> The problem is in the fact that for -march=native, the driver will pass
> -mno-prfchw, since the relevant bit is not present in cpuid flags.
I'm a little confused.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40516
--- Comment #6 from nightstrike ---
Is it supported to build GCC without MPC?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3415
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27336
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
--- Comment #9 from Man
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3415
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3415
--- Comment #9 from nightstrike ---
Not only didn't I test it with a cross compiler, I didn't do it from inside the
gcc subdirectory like the PR title implies. Double fail :(
So, nevermind. Sorry for the noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27336
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|"this" pointer is not |delete null checks in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
--- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #17)
> Is this still true?
This issue was fixed with...
r211067 | mrs | 2014-05-29 19:20:39 -0400 (Thu, 29 May 2014) | 4 lines
PR debug/61352
* colle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69582
Bug 69582 depends on bug 64177, which changed state.
Bug 64177 Summary: Various cilk+ testsuite failures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64177
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77270
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to nightstrike from comment #5)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> > The problem is in the fact that for -march=native, the driver will pass
> > -mno-prfchw, since the relevant bit is not p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77270
--- Comment #7 from nightstrike ---
The analysis from Venkat here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-05/msg00012.html
seems to indicate that the instruction is not valid for k8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67461
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67683
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58919
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77287
--- Comment #4 from Petr ---
Adding -fschedule-insns is definitely a huge improvement in this case. I wonder
why this doesn't happen by default at -O2 and -Os, as it really improves things
and makes shorter output, or it's just in this particular
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63987
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does this still happen?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77301
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77294
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
See also bug 77301 which discusses what seems like a related or similar
problem.
21 matches
Mail list logo