[Bug c++/76911] internal compiler segfault on illegal implicit cast to decimal64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76911 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libfortran/77278] New: Use LTO for libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278 Bug ID: 77278 Summary: Use LTO for libgfortran Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libfortran A

[Bug c/70250] Compilation hangs without optimization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70250 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/23855] loop header should also be pulled out of the inner loop too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23855 --- Comment #31 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 17 08:11:32 2016 New Revision: 239523 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239523&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-17 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/23855

[Bug tree-optimization/23855] loop header should also be pulled out of the inner loop too

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23855 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/23970] loop-invariant-motion is not doing it's work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23970 Bug 23970 depends on bug 23855, which changed state. Bug 23855 Summary: loop header should also be pulled out of the inner loop too https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23855 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/60042] vectorizer still does too many dependence tests for himeno:jacobi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60042 Bug 60042 depends on bug 23855, which changed state. Bug 23855 Summary: loop header should also be pulled out of the inner loop too https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23855 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/71665] [5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with non-integral constant enumerator value: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:3918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71665 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71514] ICE on C11 code with atomic exchange at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71514 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek --- Ok, looking at the get_atomic_generic_size issue.

[Bug tree-optimization/52904] -Wstrict-overflow false alarm with bounded loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52904 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||xfail Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/66488] segfault on sizeof(long) < sizeof(void*) and large GCC memory usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66488 --- Comment #13 from jyong at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jyong Date: Wed Aug 17 09:34:52 2016 New Revision: 239525 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239525&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 016-08-17 Stanislaw Halik PR target/66488 *

[Bug c++/77279] New: build error in isl/ctx.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77279 Bug ID: 77279 Summary: build error in isl/ctx.h Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee

[Bug c++/77279] build error in isl/ctx.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77279 --- Comment #1 from Oleg.A --- correction: use gcc: 4.3.4

[Bug middle-end/77269] __builtin_isinf_sign does not work for __float128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77269 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77279] build error in isl/ctx.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77279 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/77279] build error in isl/ctx.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77279 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77279] build error in isl/ctx.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77279 --- Comment #4 from Oleg.A --- g++ -std=gnu++98 -fno-PIE -c -g -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-l

[Bug middle-end/71514] ICE on C11 code with atomic exchange at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71514 --- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek --- Is it ok if I change the C FE to reject pointer-to-VLA and pointer-to-function arguments for __atomic_*?

[Bug tree-optimization/76490] [5/6/7 Regression] when use -O2 -fcheck-founds compiler appears to hang and consumes all memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76490 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 17 11:51:51 2016 New Revision: 239529 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239529&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-17 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/76490

[Bug tree-optimization/76490] [5/6 Regression] when use -O2 -fcheck-founds compiler appears to hang and consumes all memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76490 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[5/6/7 Regressio

[Bug c++/77274] GCC uses copy constructor in member initializer list instead of simple initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77274 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77274] GCC uses copy constructor in member initializer list instead of simple initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77274 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#copyelision

[Bug middle-end/77262] [7 regression] Several libjava tests FAIL on 32-bit Solaris/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77262 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >> It's indeed suspicious that exactly the same set of tests is affected, >> but my reghunt (and previous testresults) point at a totally d

[Bug libstdc++/77264] [7 Regression] std::string's replace gives wrong results with C++17, works with C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77264 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Aug 17 13:38:52 2016 New Revision: 239532 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239532&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 77264 constrain new std::basic_string overloads PR libstdc++/

[Bug c/77280] New: program using sizeof(array) fails after adding a statement with sizeof(array)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77280 Bug ID: 77280 Summary: program using sizeof(array) fails after adding a statement with sizeof(array) Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug fortran/67496] trans-array.c sanitizer runtime error: load of value 124, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67496 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug libstdc++/77264] [7 Regression] std::string's replace gives wrong results with C++17, works with C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77264 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/77259] [6/7 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn since r232167

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77259 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 17 13:56:30 2016 New Revision: 239537 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239537&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/77259 * tree-ssa-pre.c (eliminate_dom_walker

[Bug c/77280] program using sizeof(array) fails after adding a statement with sizeof(array)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77280 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Comment on attachment 39467 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39467 source Pr has an undefined value the first time through the loop.

[Bug c/77280] program using sizeof(array) fails after adding a statement with sizeof(array)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77280 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Comment on attachment 39467 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39467 source Pr has an undefined value the first time through the loop. --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Comment on att

[Bug c/77280] program using sizeof(array) fails after adding a statement with sizeof(array)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77280 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Comment on attachment 39467 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39467 source Pr has an undefined value the first time through the loop. --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Comment on att

[Bug c/77280] program using sizeof(array) fails after adding a statement with sizeof(array)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77280 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/72840] PASS->NA: 20_util/ratio/cons/cons_overflow_neg.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72840 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/69004] Building t-engine on ARM fails during -fprofile-use stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004 --- Comment #35 from PeteVine --- Probably not the first time something managed to slip past `gcov_exit`?

[Bug target/77281] New: [ARM] Wrong code generated for move of constant vector with mix of signed and unsigned zeros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77281 Bug ID: 77281 Summary: [ARM] Wrong code generated for move of constant vector with mix of signed and unsigned zeros Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/77281] [ARM] Wrong code generated for move of constant vector with mix of signed and unsigned zeros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77281 mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm --- Comment #1 from mwaha

[Bug tree-optimization/72824] [5/6 Regression] Signed floating point zero semantics broken at optimization level -O3 (tree-loop-distribute-patterns)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72824 --- Comment #12 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to mwahab from comment #11) > The new test-case gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/pr72824-2.c is failing for > arm-none-linux-gnueabihf with gcc-6 and trunk. > > I'm still looking into why. >

[Bug c/77280] program using sizeof(array) fails after adding a statement with sizeof(array)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77280 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/71752] [7 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229 w/ -O1 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71752 --- Comment #4 from alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: alahay01 Date: Wed Aug 17 15:31:44 2016 New Revision: 239542 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239542&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-08-17 Alan Hayward PR tree-optimization/71

[Bug tree-optimization/71752] [7 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229 w/ -O1 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71752 alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug middle-end/71514] ICE on C11 code with atomic exchange at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71514 --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Is it ok if I change the C FE to reject pointer-to-VLA and pointer-to-function > arguments for __atomic_*? Yes.

[Bug middle-end/71514] ICE on C11 code with atomic exchange at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71514 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/57536] Inconsistent behavior of strlen inline and unroll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57536 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/57536] Inconsistent behavior of strlen inline and unroll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57536 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 77276 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/77276] strlen expanded inline with -Os, emits larger code than with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77276 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/72775] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:677

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Would it be possible to take the size of the in-class initialized flexible array member into account when computing the size of the object to allocate? That way the example in comment #0 could be accepted and

[Bug tree-optimization/77282] New: [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/autopar/pr46193.c fails starting with r239414

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77282 Bug ID: 77282 Summary: [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/autopar/pr46193.c fails starting with r239414 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug driver/70132] ARM -mcpu=native can cause a double free abort.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #14) > Bump... I don't think this has made it into Debian's 4.9.2-10. Bumping this won't help if the Debian packagers aren't reading it.

[Bug fortran/67496] trans-array.c sanitizer runtime error: load of value 124, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67496 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Aug 17 19:08:49 2016 New Revision: 239544 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239544&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/67496 * trans-array.c (trans_array_constructor

[Bug c++/67079] Webpages and manual still claim that C++11 support is experimental

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67079 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66290] wrong location for -Wunused-macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66290 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-07-23 00:00:00 |2016-8-17 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/72817] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72817 --- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #5) > The new test case pr72817.c hangs on powerpc both BE and LE > > Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/build/gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc > -B/home/seurer/gcc/build/g

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] New: Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 Bug ID: 77283 Summary: Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimi

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/72817] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72817 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to amker from comment #7) > Thanks for reporting. > This may indicate something is still wrong in NE_EXPR analysis. I am OoO > right now and will look into this once I get back. This has been an s

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- For documentation purposes, the upstream patch that caused this is: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00189.html

[Bug tree-optimization/72817] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72817 --- Comment #9 from Bill Seurer --- I just ran a check and it is working now on powerpc. Thanks for the quick fix!

[Bug c++/77284] New: ICE on valid C++11 code using initializer list: in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:5480

model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160817 (experimental) [trunk revision 239527] (GCC) $ $ g++-4.9 -std=c++11 -c small.cpp $ clang++-3.8 -std=c++11 -c small.cpp $ $ g++-trunk -std=c++11 -c small.cpp small.cpp: In function ‘void foo(A&)’: small.cpp:10:18: sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of

[Bug driver/77275] Description of -l option refers only to static libraries, not dynamic/shared libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77275 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/50250] Driver documentation on -l does not mention shared libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50250 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||payerle at umd dot edu C

[Bug driver/50250] Driver documentation on -l does not mention shared libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50250 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||payerle at umd dot edu C

[Bug driver/69540] add a short info on .so priority in -l

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69540 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/50250] Driver documentation on -l does not mention shared libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50250 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||payerle at umd dot edu C

[Bug rtl-optimization/72771] [6/7 Regression] powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Wed Aug 17 22:41:22 2016 New Revision: 239549 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239549&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [RELOAD] Don't assume subreg mem address is ok This patch fixes a case wher

[Bug rtl-optimization/72771] [6/7 Regression] powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/70828] broken array-type subarrays inside acc data in openacc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70828 --- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cesar Date: Thu Aug 18 01:12:15 2016 New Revision: 239554 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239554&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/70828 gcc/ * gimplify.c (

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|U

[Bug other/68783] Improve verification of loop->latch in verify_loop_structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68783 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|