https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72752
--- Comment #1 from Michael ---
When it is explicitly specified to use a default template argument the code is
compiled successfully:
- 8< -- 8< -- 8< -
typedef void (*foo_t)();
void test(foo_t)
{}
template< typename >
s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72752
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72752
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70305
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39669
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40391
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40974
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41155
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42141
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42932
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66564
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68297
Gleb Natapov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gleb at scylladb dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72761
Bug ID: 72761
Summary: the "using" keyword has different behaviors
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72761
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72745
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is harder than you think, because the incomplete type error happens in the
return type, so the function body is never instantiated and adding a static
assertion there doesn't help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
--- Comment #19 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 39036
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39036&action=edit
combined patch
Hi,
I've updated the patch again based on Segher's comments.
So that's what I'd like to post
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31233
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72745
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Jul 31 17:08:52 2016
New Revision: 238924
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238924&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/72745 add static assertion for invalid tuple access
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72745
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31233
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
--- Comment #20 from Andreas Schwab ---
Works again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64759
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Severity|minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65047
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
--- Comment #10 from Manu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69115
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONFI
for 20160626 and
20160731 are r237793 and r238930, respectively, according to [1,2].
% powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe-gcc-7.0.0-alpha20160731 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe-gcc-7.0.0-alpha20160731
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/powerpc-e5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72762
Bug ID: 72762
Summary: Cann't demangle auto arguments of C++14 generic lambda
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72762
--- Comment #1 from Fujii Hironori ---
$ ./demangle
_ZZ1fvENUlT_RT0_OT1_E_4_FUNIiiiEEDTcldtLPv0EclscOS_fp_scS1_fp0_scS3_fp1_EES_S1_S3_
typed name
local name
typed name
name 'f'
function type
argument list
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72762
--- Comment #2 from Fujii Hironori ---
In GDB, this function is shown as:
> ::operator void (*)(int, int&, int&&) int, int>(void) const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160731
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68535
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-11-25 00:00:00 |2016-7-31
Known to fail|
-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160731 (experimental) [trunk revision 238915] (GCC)
$
$ g++-trunk -c -std=c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64433
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64501
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58112
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|n
40 matches
Mail list logo