[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 Ozkan Sezer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sezeroz at gmail dot com --- Comment #53 fr

[Bug fortran/72755] Internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1369

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/71781] Severe performance degradation of short parallel for loop on hardware with lots of cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71781 Jonathan Hogg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jhogg41 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/72709] Incorrect assignment of allocatable character array used as component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/68147] Potential incorrect code generation for string self-assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > When I have a moment, I intend to fix 5- and 6-branches. It would be nice to have it for the next releases. Do you want me to do the back port?

[Bug fortran/72743] ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- WORKSFORME on x86_64-apple-darwin15 for all the revisions (from 4.8 up to trunk: 7.0) and options I have tried.

[Bug fortran/72743] ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > WORKSFORME on x86_64-apple-darwin15 for all the revisions (from 4.8 > up to trunk: 7.0) and options I have tried. with/without -fopenacc for gcc-5 up to trunk.

[Bug fortran/72744] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1039

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72744 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/72741] Fortran OpenACC routine directive doesn't properly handle clauses specifying the level of parallelism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/71779] [5/6/7 regression] isl miscompiled with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779 --- Comment #18 from Andreas Schwab --- With the patches in #16 and #17 bootstrap was successful and the isl testsuite passes.

[Bug c/72750] Not possible to use -fno-builtin to suppress optimization of some standard functions like atoi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72750 --- Comment #3 from David Kreitzer --- Thanks for the prompt responses. Please consider the fact that the same behavior also occurs with "gcc -S -O2 -ffreestanding t.c". Wouldn't you agree that using the inline implementation of atoi from the h

[Bug c++/72759] New: ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, tree_class_check, ocp_convert)

/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160730 (experimental) [trunk revision 238903] (GCC) $ g

[Bug fortran/68147] Potential incorrect code generation for string self-assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147 --- Comment #13 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Dear Dominique, With one thing and another, I completely forgot about the backport. Yes, please do. I am not able to do commits fo the next week. Thanks Paul On 30 July 2016 at 11:

[Bug fortran/72755] Internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1369

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72755 --- Comment #8 from Fran Martinez Fadrique --- Thanks for the quick check. Sorry for the lengthy modules but I could not figure out the precise location of the problema within m_messages.f03. Is there a posible work around at hand? Thanks, Fran

[Bug c/72750] Not possible to use -fno-builtin to suppress optimization of some standard functions like atoi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72750 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- is not a standard part of a freestanding implementation.

[Bug fortran/71730] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when character length specification uses an undefined variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71730 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Jul 30 16:19:14 2016 New Revision: 238904 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238904&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-07-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/71730

[Bug fortran/71730] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when character length specification uses an undefined variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71730 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/70006] Duplicate errors "label not defined"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Jul 30 18:18:49 2016 New Revision: 238905 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238905&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-07-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/70006

[Bug fortran/70006] Duplicate errors "label not defined"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/69962] ICE on missing parameter attribute, in gfc_set_constant_character_len

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69962 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Jul 30 19:24:49 2016 New Revision: 238906 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238906&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-07-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/69962

[Bug fortran/69962] ICE on missing parameter attribute, in gfc_set_constant_character_len

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69962 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c++/72756] Using an enum as a constant expression via dot operator should not compile.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72756 --- Comment #2 from Claas --- No. See the live demo at http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/79f0d052864fec19

[Bug fortran/69867] ICE on initializing character in type with array of incompatible data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69867 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Jul 30 20:05:10 2016 New Revision: 238907 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238907&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-07-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/69867

[Bug fortran/69867] ICE on initializing character in type with array of incompatible data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69867 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug other/70426] decl_expr contains too little information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70426 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/70425] decl_expr contains too little information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70425 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 70426 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug other/70425] decl_expr contains too little information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70425 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- TU dump is only for debugging.

[Bug other/70425] decl_expr does not print the *_decl which is it is associated with it for tree-dump.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70425 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|decl_expr contains too |decl_expr does not print

[Bug libstdc++/54924] Warn for std::string constructor with wrong size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54924 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- This seems like a job for sanitizers.

[Bug tree-optimization/70291] muldc3 code generation could be smarter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70291 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC|

[Bug c++/60760] arithmetic on null pointers should not be allowed in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60760 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 60760, which changed state. Bug 60760 Summary: arithmetic on null pointers should not be allowed in constant expressions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60760 What|Removed

[Bug c++/60760] arithmetic on null pointers should not be allowed in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60760 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sat Jul 30 22:36:56 2016 New Revision: 238909 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238909&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/60760 - arithmetic on null pointers should not be allowed in consta

[Bug c++/71091] constexpr reference bound to a null pointer dereference accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71091 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sat Jul 30 22:36:56 2016 New Revision: 238909 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238909&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/60760 - arithmetic on null pointers should not be allowed in consta

[Bug c++/71091] constexpr reference bound to a null pointer dereference accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71091 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 71091, which changed state. Bug 71091 Summary: constexpr reference bound to a null pointer dereference accepted https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71091 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566 --- Comment #15 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Jul 30 23:01:06 2016 New Revision: 238911 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238911&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-07-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68566

[Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566 --- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to kargl from comment #16) > fixed on trunk. Thanks Steve, I am working on some other magic, did not get to it.

[Bug c++/71820] ICE on valid C++ code: in arg_assoc_type, at cp/name-lookup.c:5583

-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160730 (experimental) [trunk revision 238903] (GCC) $ $ g++-trunk small.cpp small.cpp: In function ‘int main

[Bug c++/72760] New: incorrectly rejects valid C++ code that invokes __typeof__ on a specialized template function

--disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160730 (experimental) [trunk revision 238903] (GCC) $ $ clang++-3.8 -c small.cpp $ $ g++-trunk -c small.cpp small.cpp:3:22: error: type of ‘f’ is unknown __typeof__ (f < int &

[Bug fortran/41922] Diagnostic: No location shown for overlappingly initialized EQUIVALENCEd character vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41922 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Jul 31 01:51:37 2016 New Revision: 238915 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238915&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-07-30 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/41922 *

[Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566 --- Comment #18 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #17) > (In reply to kargl from comment #16) > > fixed on trunk. > > Thanks Steve, I am working on some other magic, did not get to it. No big deal. As you

[Bug c++/70486] Constexpr array captured in lambda function (used via std::function)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70486 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276 Bug 19276 depends on bug 41922, which changed state. Bug 41922 Summary: Diagnostic: No location shown for overlappingly initialized EQUIVALENCEd character vars https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41922 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/41922] Diagnostic: No location shown for overlappingly initialized EQUIVALENCEd character vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41922 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c++/70352] [C++11] auto cannot be used in the type-id of a new-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70352 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70341] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Code size increase due to earlier switch case lowering.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70341 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |target --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug target/70341] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] cost model for addresses is incorrect, slsr is using reg + reg + CST for arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70341 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Code |[4.9/5/6/7 Regression] cost

[Bug rtl-optimization/60079] [4.9 Regression] [LRA] ICE when compiling attached case.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60079 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|WAI

[Bug sanitizer/65662] ASAN is broken for 48bit VA on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65662 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/66959] [4.9 only] Bad code generated for union type punning of NEON intrinsic types on ARM64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66959 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.4.0 Target Milestone|---