https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736
Bug ID: 72736
Summary: warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with
-march=armv8-a switch
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72737
Bug ID: 72737
Summary: warning: switch -mcpu=cortex-a53 conflicts with
-march=armv8-a switch
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
Jeffrey Walton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||noloader at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #8)
> Fixed on trunk for now.
> Will backport after some time to the branches
Bump... I don't think this has made it into Debian's 4.9.2-10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I've noted that we have suspiciously many 'thread' passes but of couse the
transform itself looks not appropriately limited.
Btw, is the compile-time spent in the threading or in followup passes that
blow u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70944
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jul 28 08:26:51 2016
New Revision: 238808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not allow make_compound_operation for vector mode
* g++.dg/vec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70944
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72717
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72517
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #12)
> On July 27, 2016 7:02:07 PM GMT+02:00, "Amit.Pawar at amd dot com"
> wrote:
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72517
> >
> >--- Comment #11 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68025
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jul 28 08:45:29 2016
New Revision: 238811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Introduce no_profile_instrument_function attribute
PR gcov-profil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68025
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72737
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 72737 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walton ---
Thanks, and sorry to waste your time with it.
Before I spin up another report that wastes a lot time, does this look like
another issue with me (likely), or an issue with GCC (unlikely):
internal compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736
--- Comment #5 from James Greenhalgh ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #4)
> Thanks, and sorry to waste your time with it.
>
> Before I spin up another report that wastes a lot time, does this look like
> another issue with me (likely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72712
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Btw, is the compile-time spent in the threading or in followup passes that
> blow up with the large number of BBs?
>
I was quite surprised because the original
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
Bug ID: 72738
Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_shift_1, at
expmed.c:2318
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72736
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #4)
> > Thanks, and sorry to waste your time with it.
> >
> > Before I spin up another report that wastes a lot time
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71574
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with my r210262.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
--- Comment #1 from James Greenhalgh ---
Testcase needs a #include to compile, but otherwise confirmed from
GCC 4.9 through to trunk.
Note that it isn't immediately clear that this is valid code - operations on
poly128_t other than vreinterpret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64*|arm*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #1)
> Testcase needs a #include to compile, but otherwise confirmed
> from GCC 4.9 through to trunk.
>
> Note that it isn't immediately clear that this is valid c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72739
Bug ID: 72739
Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.dg/vect/vect-mask-store-move-1.c after r238301
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
--- Comment #14 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Thu Jul 28 11:21:53 2016
New Revision: 238815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238815&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH] Revert Revert r238497 because of PR 71961.
This patch reverts the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902
--- Comment #6 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Thu Jul 28 11:21:53 2016
New Revision: 238815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238815&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH] Revert Revert r238497 because of PR 71961.
This patch reverts the ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72739
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
--- Comment #15 from Renlin Li ---
The change r238497 has been reverted as r238815.
I confirmed that, after the revert, the 178.gagel mis-compare
is fixed in aarch64-linux environment.
PR 71902 is reopend as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72740
Bug ID: 72740
Summary: gnat.dg/specs/access[12].ads ICE when compiling with
-g
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72683
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Jul 28 12:58:37 2016
New Revision: 238816
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238816&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/72657
PR target/72683
* tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72657
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Jul 28 12:58:37 2016
New Revision: 238816
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238816&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/72657
PR target/72683
* tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72657
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71942
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71573
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
gcc34 is fine:
q.c: In function `f2':
q.c:4: error: called object is not a function
but even r104500 ICEs, so this is ancient regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734
--- Comment #10 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Jul 28 14:19:18 2016
New Revision: 238817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2016-07-28 Yuri Rumyantsev
PR tree-optimization/717
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
Bug ID: 72741
Summary: Fortran OpenACC routine directive doesn't properly
handle clauses specifying the level of parallelism
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jul 28 14:47:02 2016
New Revision: 238822
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238822&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl
Thomas Koenig
PR fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72742
Bug ID: 72742
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2309
(error: unrecognizable insn) w/ -Os -mlra
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #2)
> (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #1)
> > Testcase needs a #include to compile, but otherwise confirmed
> > from GCC 4.9 through to trunk.
> >
> > No
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
--- Comment #48 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jul 28 15:46:07 2016
New Revision: 238824
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238824&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/7652
* jcf-dump.c (print_constant): Add break.
Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72103
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
Per c#3, could we please have another bug opened to track the tragic code
generation opportunity? ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
Walter Spector changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||w6ws at earthlink dot net
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71986
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71939
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71858
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743
Bug ID: 72743
Summary: ICE in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at
tree-ssa-structalias.c:2958
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71858
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72744
Bug ID: 72744
Summary: ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1039
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72744
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
As known, case above works with "workshare" :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: n = 20
integer :: i, z(n), h(n)
z = [(i, i=1,n)]
h = [(i, i=n,1,-1)]
call sub (n, h)
if ( a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71859
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jul 28 17:48:54 2016
New Revision: 238825
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238825&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/71859
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71859
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71665
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jul 28 18:43:29 2016
New Revision: 238828
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238828&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-07-28 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/71665
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71665
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE |[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71799
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jul 28 19:04:12 2016
New Revision: 238830
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238830&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/71799
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72457
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71799
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72745
Bug ID: 72745
Summary: Please static assert in std::get to check out of range
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72745
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jul 28 21:21:49 2016
New Revision: 238841
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238841&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl
Thomas Koenig
PR fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72457
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Reduced:
template struct box {
Element value;
constexpr box() : value{} {}
};
struct B: box { };
template box::box();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71544
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> Confirmed as fortran FE bug. The FE manages to set ".r" as fn spec attribute
> on save_cptr which specifies that its first argument does not escape.
=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160728 (experimental) [trunk revision 238824] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O2 abc.c
abc.c: In function ‘fn1’:
abc.c:12:20: warning: division by zero [-Wdiv-by-zero]
*d = a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72103
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
I looked, and decided there wasn't much we could do. So the main nastiness in
the sequence is the mem store/load, but that is just reload running out of regs
and spilling. Yes, it looks really dumb when viewin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jul 28 23:12:23 2016
New Revision: 238842
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238842&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-28 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/71067
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69964
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This appears to be fixed on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72747
Bug ID: 72747
Summary: powerpc: wrong code generated for vec_splats in
cascading assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72747
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68217
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Jul 29 00:35:23 2016
New Revision: 238846
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238846&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-07-29 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
PR
=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160728 (experimental) [trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72749
Bug ID: 72749
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error:
wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in
bb 5) w/ -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks
Produ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Jul 29 04:20:00 2016
New Revision: 238847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/72741
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 29 05:16:05 2016
New Revision: 238848
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238848&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-29 Steven G. Kargl
Thomas Koenig
PR fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
76 matches
Mail list logo
