https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71121
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:05:33 2016
New Revision: 238559
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238559&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71121 - -Waddress, constexpr, and PMFs.
* cp-gimpl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71843
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:05:24 2016
New Revision: 238558
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238558&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Improving concepts performance and diagnostics.
PR c++/67
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67579
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:05:24 2016
New Revision: 238558
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238558&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Improving concepts performance and diagnostics.
PR c++/67
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:05:39 2016
New Revision: 238560
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238560&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65168 - -Waddress in unevaluated context.
gcc/c-family/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71896
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:05:51 2016
New Revision: 238562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238562&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71896 - constexpr pointer-to-member comparison.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70942
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:05:44 2016
New Revision: 238561
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238561&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70942 - generic lambda with auto&& parameter.
* g+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70781
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:05:58 2016
New Revision: 238563
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238563&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70781 - ICE on ill-formed lambda.
* parser.c (cp_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Yep
# if __WORDSIZE == 64
# define __FD_ZERO_STOS "stosq"
# else
# define __FD_ZERO_STOS "stosl"
# endif
# define __FD_ZERO(fdsp) \
do {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.4 |---
Summary|FD_ZERO macro par
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70722
Nadav Har'El changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nyh at math dot technion.ac.il
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70824
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:14:51 2016
New Revision: 238565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238565&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70824 - initializer_list in template
* init.c (con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71814
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:15:04 2016
New Revision: 238567
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238567&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71814 - mangling sizeof... with alias templates (sP)
gcc/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71711
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:15:23 2016
New Revision: 238568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238568&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71711 - mangle C++1z fold-expressions.
gcc/cp/
* o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54430
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:15:43 2016
New Revision: 238569
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238569&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71604 - type definition in range-based for
PR c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71718
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:14:57 2016
New Revision: 238566
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238566&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71718 - infinite recursion and alias template
* pt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71604
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:15:43 2016
New Revision: 238569
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238569&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71604 - type definition in range-based for
PR c++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71946
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect parser->in_function_body is not being set in lambda functions.
Most likely because statement expressions are also rejected for the same
reason:
auto test = []{ int t = ({ int t1; t1 = 0; t1; }); }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:16:04 2016
New Revision: 238572
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238572&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71495 - spurious note during SFINAE.
* call.c (con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71092
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:16:17 2016
New Revision: 238574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71092 - ICE with array and constexpr.
* constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70781
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:16:30 2016
New Revision: 238576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238576&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70781 - ICE on ill-formed lambda.
* parser.c (cp_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71896
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:16:24 2016
New Revision: 238575
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238575&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71896 - constexpr pointer-to-member comparison.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71117
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:16:11 2016
New Revision: 238573
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238573&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71117 - core 2189 and generic lambda
* call.c (add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71511
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:15:58 2016
New Revision: 238571
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238571&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71511 - ICE on decltype scope in declaration.
* ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71513
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:15:51 2016
New Revision: 238570
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238570&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71513 - alignas on member enum in template
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67565
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:18:06 2016
New Revision: 238577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238577&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Improving concepts performance and diagnostics.
PR c++/67
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71843
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:18:06 2016
New Revision: 238577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238577&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Improving concepts performance and diagnostics.
PR c++/67
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67579
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:18:06 2016
New Revision: 238577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238577&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Improving concepts performance and diagnostics.
PR c++/67
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70722
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Nadav Har'El from comment #8)
> This issue was closed as supposedly it only affects Firefox's build. It
> definitely does not - it affects any project which attempts to replace the C
> header fil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71604
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71711
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71814
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71511
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Status|A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71513
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71117
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71092
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71896
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71121
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] Spurious |[6 Regression] Spurious
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70781
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71718
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70824
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70822
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70822
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:29:32 2016
New Revision: 238578
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238578&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/70822 (bogus error with parenthesized SCOPE_REF)
gcc/cp/Change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70106
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 21 06:29:32 2016
New Revision: 238578
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238578&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/70822 (bogus error with parenthesized SCOPE_REF)
gcc/cp/Change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70722
--- Comment #10 from Nadav Har'El ---
There is nothing "holy" about glibc, and nothing "broken" about wanting to
replace it (or, as Firefox did, only a part of it). Sure, the replacement needs
to be 100% compatible with glibc, and if it isn't, th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71953
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like this might be a regression because of the other bug you filed PR
60745 which was fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71953
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE using sanitizers with |ICE using address
|PCH
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70722
--- Comment #11 from Nadav Har'El ---
By the way, I think I made a mistake in my comment and
-D_GLIBCXX_INCLUDE_NEXT_C_HEADERS is not actually needed. The thing is that
header files like have:
#define _GLIBCXX_INCLUDE_NEXT_C_HEADERS
#include_ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495
--- Comment #7 from Yury V. Zaytsev ---
Excellent work! I will try the next version of g++-6 on our project again as
soon as it hits the toolchain test repository for Ubuntu. Many thanks for
taking care of it!
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo