[Bug debug/71864] x86_64-w64-mingw32, ICE when '-Og' & '-mssse3' are used simultaneously

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71864 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686-w64-mingw32 --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug target/71873] ICE in push_reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71873 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Assignee|unassign

[Bug target/71873] New: ICE in push_reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71873 Bug ID: 71873 Summary: ICE in push_reload Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unass

[Bug tree-optimization/71867] Optimizer generates code dereferencing a null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71867 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC|dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, | |dvyukov at gc

[Bug tree-optimization/71866] [7 Regression] gcc locks up after fix for PR70159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71866 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/71865] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/diagnostic-token-ranges.c fails starting with r237714

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71865 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger --- One question though... This depends on a special knowledge about "vfork", but it seems that gcc does not honor -ffreestanding correctly in this case, because: gcc -ffreestanding pr71104-1.c should not ha

[Bug fortran/70842] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error with character members within a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842 --- Comment #6 from nathanael.huebbe at informatik dot uni-hamburg.de --- (In reply to kargl from comment #5) > With the patch I posted earlier today and code in comment #1, I see > > gfc7 -c a.f90 > a.f90:14:30: > > print*, len(me%str

[Bug fortran/70842] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error with character members within a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from v

[Bug c++/71874] New: memmove works wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71874 Bug ID: 71874 Summary: memmove works wrong Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: una

[Bug c++/71874] memmove works wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71874 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Comment on attachment 38896 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38896 Code to reproduce bug Memmove comes from libc and in this case you got libc from redhat so you should report the bug to

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 > > --- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger --- > One question though... > > This

[Bug c/71858] Surprising suggestions for misspellings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71858 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 38897 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38897&action=edit gcc7-pr71858-1.patch Untested patch for the first issue.

[Bug c/71858] Surprising suggestions for misspellings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71858 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 38898 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38898&action=edit gcc7-pr71858-2.patch And for the second issue.

[Bug target/71873] ICE in push_reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71873 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #15) > On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 > > > > --- Comment #14 from Bernd

[Bug testsuite/71489] [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/attr-hotcold-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71489 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Thu Jul 14 09:10:24 2016 New Revision: 238330 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238330&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Added forgotten PR testsuite/71489 reference. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuit

[Bug testsuite/71865] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/diagnostic-token-ranges.c fails starting with r237714

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71865 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/71489] [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/attr-hotcold-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71489 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71875] New: template specialization compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875 Bug ID: 71875 Summary: template specialization compile error Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug testsuite/71865] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/diagnostic-token-ranges.c fails starting with r237714

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71865 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, the PPC/SPU/s390 builtin conditional macros. For the testcase, the easiest tweak would be to compile with -std=c11, so that this mess isn't defined. Dunno if we should ignore the conditional macros from t

[Bug fortran/71861] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in write_symbol(): bad module symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71861 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/71862] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:241

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71862 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/71860] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on pointing to null(mold), verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c/71858] Surprising suggestions for misspellings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71858 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/71857] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopt_mult_4.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71857 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71875] template specialization compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875 liwei changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71871] ICE on mixing templates and vector extensions ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71871 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UN

[Bug target/71874] [4.9 Regression] memmove works wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71874 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/71871] ICE on mixing templates and vector extensions ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71871 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug libstdc++/70716] Doxygen comments on std containers need updating for C++11 allocators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70716 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Jul 14 10:02:10 2016 New Revision: 238332 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238332&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Improve doxygen comments for allocators in containers PR libstdc

[Bug libstdc++/70716] Doxygen comments on std containers need updating for C++11 allocators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70716 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 > > --- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de fr

[Bug c++/71875] [5/6 Regression] template specialization compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71875] [5/6 Regression] template specialization compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid CC|

[Bug c++/63875] Bogus unused-but-set-parameter warning when expanding a variadic template argument pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63875 Roman Perepelitsa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roman.perepelitsa at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/71875] [6 Regression] template specialization compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2 Summary|[5/6 Regression] t

[Bug c++/71875] [5 Regression] template specialization compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6 Regression] template |[5 Regression] template

[Bug c++/71871] ICE on mixing templates and vector extensions ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71871 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c/71876] New: longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 Bug ID: 71876 Summary: longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/59833] ARM soft-float extendsfdf2 fails to quiet signaling NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59833 --- Comment #7 from Aurelien Jarno --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #6) > (In reply to Aurelien Jarno from comment #5) > > (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #4) > > > Need to apply Aurelien's patch - looks like that

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #18 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #17) > Can you open a separate bug please? sure: pr71876

[Bug c/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger --- I'm unsure, if ECF_LEAF is also unsafe: /* The function does not lead to calls within current function unit. */ #define ECF_LEAF (1 << 10) I couldn't guarantee for that in a freestanding

[Bug libgomp/71877] New: -fdump-tree-ompexp is generating incomplete code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71877 Bug ID: 71877 Summary: -fdump-tree-ompexp is generating incomplete code Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libgomp/71877] -fdump-tree-ompexp is generating incomplete code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71877 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reduced testcase: struct __attribute__((may_alias)) S { int a; }; void foo (int *x, struct S *y) { int i; for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) { int a = 0; if (*x) *(struct S *) y = *(struct

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] [7 Regression] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Summary|ICE in inchash::a

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] New: ICE in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 Bug ID: 71878 Summary: ICE in Product: gcc Version: 5.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unass

[Bug tree-optimization/71866] [7 Regression] gcc locks up after fix for PR70159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71866 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jul 14 12:15:38 2016 New Revision: 238334 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238334&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-07-14 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/71866

[Bug c/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- test case for the ECF_LEAF: test.c: int setjmp(void); static int x; void foo(int z) { x = z; } int bar(void) { int z = x; setjmp(); z += x; return z; } gcc -O3 -S -ffreestanding test.c bar: .

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Created attachment 38902 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38902&action=edit Testcase allowing to reproduce ICE in cselib

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in cselib_record_set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-none-eabi Assignee|un

[Bug tree-optimization/71866] [7 Regression] gcc locks up after fix for PR70159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71866 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/71652] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in in ix86_target_macros_internal, at config/i386/i386-c.c:187

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71652 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- And, what is "qsetjmp" ? Also "setjmp_syscall", "savectx" are also completely new to me. And why is the prefix "__x" discarded?

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] [7 Regression] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/71867] Optimizer generates code dereferencing a null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71867 --- Comment #2 from Vadim Zeitlin --- I'll try to add the preprocessed code a bit later, but, FWIW, I can already say that there is no macro trickery whatsoever in this code itself.

[Bug bootstrap/66319] [6 Regression] gcov-tool.c:84:65: error: invalid conversion from 'int (*)(const c har*, const stat*, int, FTW*)' to 'int (*)(const char*, const stat*, int, FTW)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319 --- Comment #19 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-07-12 10:38 AM, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Patch looks reasonable but needs to be sent to gcc-patches with cc's. Further, the patch needs to be submitted by someone with a gcc c

[Bug c++/71879] New: Error in unevaluated context breaks SFINAE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71879 Bug ID: 71879 Summary: Error in unevaluated context breaks SFINAE Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/71879] Error in unevaluated context breaks SFINAE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71879 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Taking the address of Foo::foo instantiates it, which results in an error outside the immediate context, so you get an error not a substitution failure. http://stackoverflow.com/a/15261234/981959

[Bug fortran/71880] New: pointer to allocatable character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71880 Bug ID: 71880 Summary: pointer to allocatable character Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug go/71396] "use of undefined type" error in gccgo-6 when go (1.6.1) is perfectly happy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71396 Than McIntosh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thanm at google dot com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug fortran/71880] pointer to allocatable character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71880 --- Comment #1 from Valery Weber --- what about this one? cat gcc-6.1b.f90 program t character(:), dimension(:), allocatable, target :: c character(:), dimension(:), pointer :: p allocate(c(10),source='X') p=>c(:) write(*,*) 'p=<',p(1),'> c=<',c

[Bug c++/58796] throw nullptr not caught by catch(type*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Perhaps ECF_MAY_BE_ALLOCA too? But ECF_NORETURN and ECF_LEAF are not > conservative, sure. Yes. That's right. alloca can not return null. See tree_expr_nonzero

[Bug c++/58796] throw nullptr not caught by catch(type*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #12) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > > However with that patch the caught pointer is not null, so it's not right. > > For a pointer, you just need

[Bug c++/58796] throw nullptr not caught by catch(type*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill --- Also note that a null pointer to data member is represented as -1, not 0, so you'll want *(ptrdiff_t*)thrown_ptr = -1; for that case. A null pointer to member function is { nullptr, 0 }. You might also

[Bug target/65951] [AArch64] Will not vectorize 64bit integer multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951 --- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Jul 14 14:32:39 2016 New Revision: 238340 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238340&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [vectorizer][2/2] Hook up mult synthesis logic into vecto

[Bug tree-optimization/70923] [7 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr60092.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70923 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Jul 14 14:32:39 2016 New Revision: 238340 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238340&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [vectorizer][2/2] Hook up mult synthesis logic into vecto

[Bug fortran/70842] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error with character members within a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vehre from comment #7) > Hi Karl, > > (In reply to kargl from comment #5) > > With the patch I posted earlier today and code in comment #1, I see > > which patch are you referring to?

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] [7 Regression] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On July 14, 2016 2:33:12 PM GMT+02:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 > >Jakub Jelinek changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug target/65951] [AArch64] Will not vectorize 64bit integer multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug tree-optimization/70923] [7 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr60092.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70923 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/59833] ARM soft-float extendsfdf2 fails to quiet signaling NaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59833 --- Comment #8 from ramana.radhakrishnan at foss dot arm.com --- On 14/07/16 12:15, aurelien at aurel32 dot net wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59833 > > --- Comment #7 from Aurelien Jarno --- > (In reply to Ramana Radhakri

[Bug target/65952] [AArch64] Will not vectorize storing induction of pointer addresses for LP64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952 Bug 65952 depends on bug 65951, which changed state. Bug 65951 Summary: [AArch64] Will not vectorize 64bit integer multiplication https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 65951, which changed state. Bug 65951 Summary: [AArch64] Will not vectorize 64bit integer multiplication https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/71872] [7 Regression] ICE in inchash::add_expr, at tree.c:7782 - OEP_ADDRESS_OF asserted for ADDR_EXPR applied to constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71872 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Will change. While: /* PR tree-optimization/71872 */ struct __attribute__((may_alias)) S { int *a; }; int b; void foo (int *x, struct S *y) { int i; for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) { int *a = &b;

[Bug middle-end/50060] intrinsics not folded by the middle-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50060 Paul A. Bristow changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pbristow at hetp dot u-net.com --- Com

[Bug fortran/70842] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error with character members within a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #9 from ve

[Bug c++/63875] Bogus unused-but-set-parameter warning when expanding a variadic template argument pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63875 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/69028] ICE on *any* valid Cilk+ code C/C++: -fcilkplus is incompatible with -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69028 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Ok, the problem comes from r224161: Author: aldyh Date: Fri Jun 5 18:44:53 2015 + Merge debug-early branch into mainline. where running: ./xg++ -B. ~/Programming/testcases/PR69028/pr69028.ii -fci

[Bug driver/69028] ICE on *any* valid Cilk+ code C/C++: Invalid read of size 2 in cp_dump_tree(void*, tree_node*) (dump.c:318)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69028 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 38904 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38904&action=edit Candidate patch for the profiling issue Following cilk function has no location, if it's a valid that a function

[Bug tree-optimization/71881] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu: cannot update SSA form

/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160714 (experimental) [trunk revision 238331] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c $ gcc-trunk -O2 -g -c small.c $ gcc-6.1 -O3 -g -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -g -c small.c

[Bug c++/71882] New: elaborated-type-specifier friend not looked up in unnamed namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71882 Bug ID: 71882 Summary: elaborated-type-specifier friend not looked up in unnamed namespace Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/71881] [4.9/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu: cannot update SSA form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71881 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug target/71869] __builtin_isgreater raises an invalid exception on PPC64 using __float128 inputs.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71869 --- Comment #1 from Paul E. Murphy --- __builtin_isfinite also has a similar issue.

[Bug fortran/71807] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error with NULL() reference in structure constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71807 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Assignee|una

[Bug c++/58796] throw nullptr not caught by catch(type*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #12) > For a pointer to member function that's still problematic because the > exception object for 'throw nullptr' is currently one word, and a pointer to > member fu

[Bug fortran/71883] New: ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883 Bug ID: 71883 Summary: ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug rtl-optimization/71878] ICE in cselib_record_set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Thu Jul 14 16:41:06 2016 New Revision: 238346 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238346&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-07-14 Thomas Preud'homme gcc/ PR rtl-optimization

[Bug c++/70977] [6/7 Regression] Out of memory during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com --

[Bug fortran/71884] New: ICE in gfc_trans_allocate, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5582 and :5698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71884 Bug ID: 71884 Summary: ICE in gfc_trans_allocate, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5582 and :5698 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/71884] ICE in gfc_trans_allocate, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:5582 and :5698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71884 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Another source position with obviously invalid code : $ cat za.f90 program p character(:), allocatable :: z allocate (character(*) :: z) end $ gfortran-7-20160710 za.f90 za.f90:3:0: alloca

[Bug fortran/71883] ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Runtime behavior : $ cat y1.f90 program p character(3), allocatable :: z(:,:) z(1:2,1:2) = 'abc' z(2,1) = z(1,2) z(2,1) = z(1,2) end $ gfortran-6 -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all -fno-frontend-

[Bug fortran/71883] ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Backup tests, analogous backtrace : $ cat z2.f90 program p character(:), allocatable :: z(:,:) z(1:2,1:2) = 'abc' z(2,1) = z(12) z(21) = z(1,2) end $ cat z3.f90 program p character(3)

[Bug c++/71885] New: Incorrect code generated with -01, function calls are missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71885 Bug ID: 71885 Summary: Incorrect code generated with -01, function calls are missing Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

  1   2   >