https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71521
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 07:30:04 2016
New Revision: 238077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71423
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 07:30:04 2016
New Revision: 238077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71452
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 07:30:04 2016
New Revision: 238077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 07:30:04 2016
New Revision: 238077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71522
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 07:30:04 2016
New Revision: 238077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71786
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71774
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63151
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71688
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71703
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71706
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71758
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71710
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71718
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60621
--- Comment #7 from marc at kdab dot com ---
Retesting with GCC 6.1, it looks better now:
$ g++ -O2 -o emplace-vs-push_back{.pb,.cpp}
$ g++ -O2 -o emplace-vs-push_back{.eb,.cpp} -DEMPLACE_BACK
$ strip emplace-vs-push_back.*
$ size emplace
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70822
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70916
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71789
Bug ID: 71789
Summary: atomic_int incompatibility warning between C and C++
[-Wlto-type-mismatch]
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71790
Bug ID: 71790
Summary: C++ attributes on expression statements result in
compile error
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71633
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71785
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71624
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71783
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
As the comment says the FE is failing to put 'cline' into a BIND_EXPR. It has
a
'.cline' but not 'cline'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71782
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70342
marc at kdab dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #13 from marc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71791
Bug ID: 71791
Summary: [ARM] missed the implementation of ACLE intrinsics
vminnm_f32/vminnmq_f32/vmaxnm_f32/vmaxnmq_f32
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71792
Bug ID: 71792
Summary: deducing type from bitfield leads to overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71793
Bug ID: 71793
Summary: Volatile local variable passed by value is (wrongly?)
optimised away, but the containing loop is not
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71785
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Created attachment 38847
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38847&action=edit
proposed patch to bb-reorder
Proposed patch. Works for the testcase in here without removing the
8 succes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784
--- Comment #2 from Ela ---
Created attachment 38848
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38848&action=edit
*.cc file producing the crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784
--- Comment #3 from Ela ---
Created attachment 38849
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38849&action=edit
the compiler complaint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784
--- Comment #4 from Ela ---
Created attachment 38850
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38850&action=edit
code dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784
--- Comment #5 from Ela ---
gcc = gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20150212 (Red Hat 4.9.2-6)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784
--- Comment #6 from Ela ---
- ... it doesn't matter (or it does ?) if op's are first
instantiated via template, or everything is in one file
and instantiated "per-need" when they appear (used).
(tested various versions and cannot remember
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71789
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The original intention of the C++ committee was that std::atomic_int would be
compatible with the corresponding C type, but that design was changed during
the C11 process when the _Atomic qualifier was adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71791
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71793
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71788
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71423
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 10:33:01 2016
New Revision: 238084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71452
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 10:33:01 2016
New Revision: 238084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71522
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 10:33:01 2016
New Revision: 238084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71794
Bug ID: 71794
Summary: Std::array as an incomplete type in nested name
specifier.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
So this is loop unswitching unswitching on a condition that is not always
executed
(i_48 != 0), it is guarded by e.3_30 != 0 (which is not invariant). It's not
trivial to see the use of i_48 can be uninitia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71744
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38852
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38852&action=edit
gcc7-pr71744.patch
Untested patch for the old-style registry. But as long as glibc still takes a
global lock i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 11:37:24 2016
New Revision: 238085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71794
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If you fix your partial specialization it works with all compilers:
template /* correct type */
struct B>
{
static std::array bar()
{
return std::array();
}
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71794
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71624
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Jul 7 11:45:11 2016
New Revision: 238086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR ipa/71624
* ipa-inline-analysis.c (compute_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70022
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 11:46:08 2016
New Revision: 238087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70022
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71452
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 11:46:08 2016
New Revision: 238087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70484
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70931
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 11:46:08 2016
New Revision: 238087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70484
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 7 11:46:08 2016
New Revision: 238087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71522
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71452
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71794
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
VC++ accepts it too, so it's two for and two against.
Reduced:
template struct X { };
template struct Y;
template struct Y> { };
template Y f() { return {}; }
auto x = f< X<1> >();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70867
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795
Bug ID: 71795
Summary: Two Bugs in array constructors (optimization)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71794
Pawel Bednarski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71787
--- Comment #2 from Gary Funck ---
Manuel, thanks for the quick follow up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70336
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:33:10 2016
New Revision: 238090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238090&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-04-05 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70574
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:34:07 2016
New Revision: 238091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-04-08 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71796
Bug ID: 71796
Summary: Link error referencing compiler generated symbol
__vtab_xxx
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:39:40 2016
New Revision: 238092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238092&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-04-13 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70633
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:40:43 2016
New Revision: 238093
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238093&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-04-13 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:41:25 2016
New Revision: 238094
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238094&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-04-13 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71498
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:42:43 2016
New Revision: 238095
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238095&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-13 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71494
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:43:50 2016
New Revision: 238096
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238096&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-10 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71516
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:44:33 2016
New Revision: 238097
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71528
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:45:44 2016
New Revision: 238098
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238098&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71581
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:46:33 2016
New Revision: 238099
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238099&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-20 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71588
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:47:20 2016
New Revision: 238100
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238100&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71705
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:49:04 2016
New Revision: 238102
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238102&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-30 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71626
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:48:16 2016
New Revision: 238101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238101&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71704
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:50:01 2016
New Revision: 238103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238103&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-06-30 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71717
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:51:01 2016
New Revision: 238104
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238104&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-07-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 7 12:59:39 2016
New Revision: 238108
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238108&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-03-02 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71797
Bug ID: 71797
Summary: Spurious unused-variable warning with inline function
and unrelated error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70336
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70574
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo