https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71765
Bug ID: 71765
Summary: incorrectly accepts invalid C++ code that invokes base
class constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Backporting r217638 to gcc-4.9 fixes the problem too.
Allowing propagation of __cond60 and __cond59 comparisons into comparisons of
len elides the wrong optimization.
---
__cond60_9 = len_8(D) > 1;
if (__cond
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71757
--- Comment #9 from Timo Teräs ---
Adding the following also works for me:
--- gcc-6.1.0/libjava/Makefile.am
+++ gcc-6.1.0/libjava/Makefile.am
@@ -488,10 +488,14 @@
nat_files = $(nat_source_files:.cc=.lo)
xlib_nat_files = $(xlib_nat_source_fil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71214
__vic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.v.a at ngs dot ru
--- Comment #1 from __vic -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71765
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71755
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71214
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623
--- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Tue Jul 5 12:06:22 2016
New Revision: 238002
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238002&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-07-05 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623
--- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Waiting one week for regressions to pop up before applying to gcc-6 and -5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #15 from Goswin von Brederlow ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> (In reply to Goswin von Brederlow from comment #13)
> > > > Secondly why pass error_code as argument if is already on the stack and
> > > > could be accessed t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71763
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux |powerpc64*-linux
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71088
--- Comment #1 from Igor Zamyatin ---
Fixed by r237982
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71763
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 38833
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38833&action=edit
output reloads on jump insns
Revised https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00739.html
It's surprising how
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71763
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Actually, needs -mcpu=power8 as well, otherwise we get another ICE (we need
direct moves for FP regs in the ctr patterns; this is the case that is not
yet solved in PR70098).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71766
Bug ID: 71766
Summary: Strange position of "error: request for member ‘...’
in something not a structure or union"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71621
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Another one, just for the record:
int hf, sv, zz, aj;
void
dn (int xb, int bl)
{
while (zz < 1)
{
if (xb == 0)
goto mr;
while (bl < 3)
{
int d3;
unsigned char vh;
u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Goswin von Brederlow from comment #15)
> > No. We only do it for data pushed onto stack by CPU.
>
> I was thinking of something like:
>
> __attribute__ ((interrupt("save_regs")))
> void
> f (struc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jul 5 15:50:54 2016
New Revision: 238008
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238008&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for "expected ';' after class definition"
Hi gcc-developers and -users,
#include
using namespace std;
int main() {
auto my_lambda = [](auto i) {
cout << "asdf\n" << i;
};
auto my_lambda2 = [](int i) {
cout << "asdf\n" << i;
};
my_lambda(1);
my_lambda(2.0);
my_lambda2(3);
return 0;
}
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Workaround is to remove the ONLY clause in the
sqlite3_primitive module.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
Bug ID: 71767
Summary: Endless stream of warnings when using GCC with -Wa,-q
and Clang Integrated Assembler
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Walton ---
Also see LLVM Issue 28427, "Endless stream of warnings when using GCC with
-Wa,-q and Clang Integrated Assembler",
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28427.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71214
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71594
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71594
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Jul 5 16:37:40 2016
New Revision: 238013
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238013&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTL ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/71594: ICE in noce_emit_cm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71763
--- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner ---
Note if you put the requirement that you need direct move, you will potentially
have the problem in power7.
I'm really tired of the register allocator trying to be 'helpful' in
de-optimizing BDNZ loops by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71768
Bug ID: 71768
Summary: Missed trivial rematerialiation oppurtunity
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: rt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71763
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #6)
> Note if you put the requirement that you need direct move, you will
> potentially have the problem in power7.
Yes; we have that same problem for FPRs alr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71763
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner ---
In the past we have tried restricting the registers of the pattern to just GPRs
and CTR, and it pops back in another fashion (whack-a-mole).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71214
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Tue Jul 5 17:50:41 2016
New Revision: 238017
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238017&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/71214
PR c++/71214
* c-cppbuiltin.c (c_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71214
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Tue Jul 5 17:55:36 2016
New Revision: 238019
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238019&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/71214
PR c++/71214
* c-cppbuiltin.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71214
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Tue Jul 5 18:01:47 2016
New Revision: 238021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238021&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/71214
PR c++/71214
* c-cppbuiltin.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71214
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71214
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Tue Jul 5 17:58:35 2016
New Revision: 238020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/71214
PR c++/71214
* c-cppbuiltin.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71768
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||assemble-failure
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=250349
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71768
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Also the cost model seems wrong. If the register can be rematerialized (i.e.
it has REG_EQUIV), the memory_cost of the actual initialization insn should not
be accounted IMO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71769
Bug ID: 71769
Summary: Invalid warning from -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations for a
finite loop
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764
--- Comment #5 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Some other variants :
$ cat zz1.f90
program p
use iso_c_binding, only: c_ptr, c_null_ptr, c_ptr
type(c_ptr) :: c
c = c_null_ptr
end
$ cat zz3.f90
program p
use iso_c_binding, only: c_ptr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
Bug ID: 71770
Summary: gfortran: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(program f951)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71771
Bug ID: 71771
Summary: DR 685 applied incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71772
Bug ID: 71772
Summary: temmplates broken.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71772
--- Comment #1 from Jim Michaels ---
Created attachment 38837
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38837&action=edit
.s file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71772
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71144
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
--- Comment #2 from Isabelle ---
It is installed with wfdb package from Physionet:
https://www.physionet.org/physiotools/wfdb-windows-quick-start.shtml#c32s
The whole package can hte downloaded from:
http://physionet.org/physiotools/wfdb.tar.g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
--- Comment #3 from Isabelle ---
All of this was working before I upgraded Cygwin, and tried to compile again
ecgpuwave.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Isabelle from comment #3)
> All of this was working before I upgraded Cygwin, and tried to compile again
> ecgpuwave.
Did you read the initial error message and follow
the direction?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71768
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6/7 Regression] |[4.9/5/6/7 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71774
Bug ID: 71774
Summary: Bogus "is protected" error when list-initializing a
base class with a defaulted protected constructor and
a virtual function
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71773
Bug ID: 71773
Summary: [7 Regression] bogus? error: invalid use of incomplete
type
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71775
Bug ID: 71775
Summary: Redundant move instruction for sign extension
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71773
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71775
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Component|tree-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71776
Bug ID: 71776
Summary: relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 against
symbol `__gnu_h2f_internal'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71777
Bug ID: 71777
Summary: __builtin_cpu_supports() doesn't work on powerpc
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
63 matches
Mail list logo
