https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #5 from ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71717
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71718
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71725
Bug ID: 71725
Summary: Backend decides to generate larger and possibly slower
float ops for integer ops that appear in source
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71726
Bug ID: 71726
Summary: Simplify (intptr_t)p+4-(intptr_t)(p+4)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71727
Bug ID: 71727
Summary: O3 optimization assumes 16byte alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729
--- Comment #28 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Fri Jul 1 09:42:01 2016
New Revision: 237907
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237907&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/70729
gcc/
* tree-vectorizer.c (adjust_si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Jul 1 11:15:17 2016
New Revision: 237909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
strcpy arg optimised out
For functions that return an argument unchanged, l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Jul 1 12:09:53 2016
New Revision: 237910
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237910&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/71151
* gcc.target/avr/pr71151-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70164
--- Comment #16 from Andre Vieira ---
Any progress on this one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71714
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You need to explain what you mean by "release version" and "debug version".
There are no such "modes" for GCC, you can use any combination of -O
optimization options and also use -g for debug info.
So inst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70748
Antony Lewis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71719
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69601
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-06-26 00:00:00 |2016-7-1
--- Comment #4 from Joost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71698
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Jul 1 13:51:35 2016
New Revision: 237911
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237911&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/71698
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71728
Bug ID: 71728
Summary: ICE with goto in statement-expression inside a
condition
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
--- Comment #10 from jb999 at gmx dot de ---
Could someone please explain what this means for binutils >= 2.26 and gcc
4.9.3?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71728
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71729
Bug ID: 71729
Summary: -Wl,-z,noexecstack Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71719
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38813
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38813&action=edit
gcc7-pr71719.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71717
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 1 15:13:28 2016
New Revision: 237916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237916&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/71717
* trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_privatize_by_re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71729
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71730
Bug ID: 71730
Summary: ICE when character length specification uses an
undefined variable
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71729
--- Comment #2 from Pierre Navaro ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Don't do it then. -z noexecstack asserts there are no trampolines in the
> code, but your code does need trampolines and thus executable stack, because
> you are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71731
Bug ID: 71731
Summary: incorrect result for vectorized char rotate with
-mcpu=power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71731
--- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38815
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38815&action=edit
asm source of test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71698
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Jul 1 16:06:26 2016
New Revision: 237917
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237917&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from trunk
2016-07-01 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71698
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71730
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: decl.c
===
@@ -905,6 +906,7 @@ char_len_param_value (gfc_expr **expr, b
goto syntax;
else if ((*expr)->expr_type == EXP
/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160701 (experimental) [trunk revision 237910] (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Fri Jul 1 17:56:54 2016
New Revision: 237919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237919&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from trunk
2016-06-27 Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
--- Comment #11 from Nix ---
The symptoms are failures to link with "relocation against protected symbol is
invalid" errors which go away when you use gold. (You can see it if you try to
build firefox, for instance.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00056.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71720
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Jul 1 18:23:29 2016
New Revision: 237920
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237920&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-07-01 Michael Meissner
PR target/71720
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> Patch posted for review:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00056.html
Fascinating stuff. Thanks.
I'll give it a good going over by throwing Fedor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71732
Bug ID: 71732
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr71532.c at -O2 and above
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71732
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
The last argument (in r18) is not stored to argument slot:
ldi 5,%r4
stw %r18,-80(%r30)
stw %r16,-76(%r30)
stw %r14,-72(%r30)
stw %r12,-68(%r30)
stw %r10,-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71732
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Present in 4.9, 5 and 6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35849
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: simplify.c
===
--- simplify.c (revision 237855)
+++ simplify.c (working copy)
@@ -3280,7 +3280,6 @@ gfc_simplify_ishftc (gfc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71731
--- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This fails with trunk 237811 or later, but that is because power9-dform-vector
was turned on by default there. For instance 237715 also fails this if you add
-mpower9-dform-vector to the flags.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #12)
> ===
> --- check.c (revision 237855)
> +++ check.c (working copy)
> @@ -3820,7 +3820,7 @@ gfc_check_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71733
Bug ID: 71733
Summary: ICE in vmx test cases with -mcpu=power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71732
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
The following insn is deleted in postreload:
(insn 55 50 91 2 (set (mem:SI (reg/f:SI 17 %r17 [101]) [0 S4 A32])
(reg:SI 18 %r18 [102]))
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr7153
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71722
--- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
adding -mno-power9-dform-vector does not help this one. So, likely not
dform-vector related.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71687
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 1 20:52:54 2016
New Revision: 237926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/71687
* f95-lang.c (struct binding_level): Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41922
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: target-memory.h
===
--- target-memory.h (revision 237855)
+++ target-memory.h (working copy)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ int gfc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734
Bug ID: 71734
Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd4.f90 -O3
-g execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71728
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71718
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71722
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71733
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner ---
That altivec load should not be using reg+offset (dform) addressing. I'll have
a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71713
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71710
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70385
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71595
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00069.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29819
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: parse.c
===
--- parse.c (revision 236243)
+++ parse.c (working copy)
@@ -5237,6 +5237,7 @@ parse_contained (int module)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38351
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: resolve.c
===
--- resolve.c (revision 236243)
+++ resolve.c (working copy)
@@ -3586,7 +3586,13 @@ resolve_operator (gfc_exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71719
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Jul 2 06:41:29 2016
New Revision: 237937
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237937&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71719
* c-typeck.c (mark_exp_read): Handle VIEW_CONVE
66 matches
Mail list logo
