https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71707
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71696
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71703
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71704
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71705
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71706
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71707
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71712
Bug ID: 71712
Summary: Redundant ABI tags for conversion operator
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71706
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/7 Regression] ICE on |[6/7 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71707
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38799
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38799&action=edit
gcc7-pr71707.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71585
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Hunk in ipa-inline-transform.c has been backported to GCC-6 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71712
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71693
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 30 08:52:43 2016
New Revision: 237875
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237875&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/71693
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) : Cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71708
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71710
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71711
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71693
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 30 09:02:53 2016
New Revision: 237876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237876&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/71693
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) : Cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71693
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 30 09:08:32 2016
New Revision: 237877
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237877&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/71693
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) : Cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #14 from Matt Godbolt ---
We confirm seeing the same issue (a large proprietary system, when building
optimized tests at -O3 but linking against test libraries compiled with -O2).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71693
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 30 09:17:17 2016
New Revision: 237878
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237878&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/71693
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) : Cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71699
--- Comment #6 from Manish Goregaokar ---
I built gcc trunk, uncommenting `tail = name;` does not make the warning go
away unless I'm using -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71693
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71699
--- Comment #7 from Manish Goregaokar ---
Created attachment 38800
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38800&action=edit
Patch
This patch works in -O2. I'm new to contributing to gcc, so posting it here
before sending it to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #15 from Matt Godbolt ---
I just tried on GCC 6.1; same issue (lto-symtab.c:119 similarly to anthony's
snapshot build).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The real code would need to be more complicated to handle arrays of unknown
bound and void, or valid code would trigger the static assertion. Even then,
I'd be worried about introducing ODR violations, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
Goswin von Brederlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||goswin-v-b at web dot de
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This seems to work OK:
namespace std {
template
struct __is_complete_impl
{
template
static true_type
_S_test(int);
template
static false_type
_S_test(...);
us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71693
--- Comment #11 from niva at niisi dot msk.ru ---
Thank you very much for such a quick respond.
I have adapted the patch to gcc-4.7.4, it works Ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, __is_cv_void isn't needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71705
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71688
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed the above fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02038.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71713
Bug ID: 71713
Summary: "initializer element is not constant" with nested
casts
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71632
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 38802
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38802&action=edit
fix
Cures the error in find_call_crossed_cheap_reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71704
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71714
Bug ID: 71714
Summary: -g flag doubles size
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71708
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71708
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71651
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Jun 30 14:28:50 2016
New Revision: 237880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237880&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix bogus option suggestions for RejectNegative options (PR driver/7165
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71714
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71714
--- Comment #2 from LendLord ---
I mean release version size bigger than debug version
Debug version - 90mb
Release version - 190mb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71651
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Jun 30 14:39:10 2016
New Revision: 237881
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237881&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix bogus option suggestions for RejectNegative options (PR driver/7165
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71651
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71714
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
So -O0 -g vs -O2 ?
We need a testcase still.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67037
--- Comment #12 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to notasas from comment #11)
> FWIW I've tried sending a backport patch, but it was ignored:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg03116.html
If you don't get a response from a mainta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71687
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71711
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71715
Bug ID: 71715
Summary: FAIL: 23_containers/deque/modifiers/swap/2.cc (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71032
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71704
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 30 17:45:21 2016
New Revision: 237888
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237888&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/71704
* parse.c (matchs, matcho): Move right be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71705
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 30 17:39:52 2016
New Revision: 237887
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237887&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/71705
* trans-openmp.c (gfc_trans_omp_clauses):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #11 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Another constellation (appearing legal) :
$ cat zz1.f90
program p
integer :: n(2) = [2,1]
print *, reshape ([1,2,3,4,5,6], [2,4], [0,0], [2,1])
print *, reshape ([1,2,3,4,5,6], [2,4], [0,0],
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71707
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 30 18:45:18 2016
New Revision: 237889
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237889&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71707
* tree-ssa-strlen.c (get_stridx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71707
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yeah that looks better, I'm still confused by REG_DEAD vs. REG_UNUSED, sigh.
The whole logic here seems somewhat confused. Or at least it is confusing me
:-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #11)
> Another constellation (appearing legal) :
>
>
> $ cat zz1.f90
> program p
>integer :: n(2) = [2,1]
>print *, reshape ([1,2,3,4,5,6], [2,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Goswin von Brederlow from comment #11)
> I think the design is fundamentally lacking in the following points:
>
> 1. interrupt handler must be declared with a mandatory pointer argument:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71698
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|segher at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71716
Bug ID: 71716
Summary: [7 Regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-4.c is
compiled into infinite loop
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71717
Bug ID: 71717
Summary: A gfortran silent "wrong code" bug in the transition
from 4.9.0 -> 4.9.1, using OpenMP.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71718
Bug ID: 71718
Summary: ICE on erroneous recursive template error printing
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
gure --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-checking=yes,rtl,df --without-cloog --without-ppl --without-isl
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-237869-checking-yes-rtl-df-nographite-amd64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160630 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71716
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71720
Bug ID: 71720
Summary: initialization of a vector of floats generates
incorrect code for -mcpu=power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71721
Bug ID: 71721
Summary: uclinux posix threads
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71720
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jun 30 20:36:25 2016
New Revision: 237894
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237894&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Clone branch to fix pr 71720
Added:
branches/ibm/pr71720/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71720
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71716
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from H.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71552
--- Comment #8 from Mason ---
Thanks, Martin.
Will your fix be back-ported to gcc 5/6 or will it only be in gcc 7 ?
Regards.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71699
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Manish Goregaokar from comment #7)
> Created attachment 38800 [details]
> Patch
>
> This patch works in -O2. I'm new to contributing to gcc, so posting it here
> before sending it to the m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71720
--- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I believe this also causes pr57741-2.c to fail, generated code is:
fmuls 12,1,12
fadds 0,10,1
xxpermdi 33,10,11,0
xscvdpspn 12,12
xvcvdpsp 33,33
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71722
Bug ID: 71722
Summary: incorrect code for test pr64252.c for -mcpu=power9
-mpower9-vector -ftree-vectorize -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71677
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Jun 30 21:54:47 2016
New Revision: 237898
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237898&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-30 Michael Meissner
PR target/71677
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71722
--- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38809
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38809&action=edit
generated asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723
Bug ID: 71723
Summary: ICE with attempted pointer initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
Bug ID: 71724
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault, deep
recursion between combine_simplify_rtx and subst
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71699
--- Comment #9 from Manish Goregaokar ---
Already sent it :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02057.HTML is the current patch;
need to look at the test failures before moving forward.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
find_call_crossed_cheap_reg is certainly confusing. On looking at it again
this morning, I can't see why it uses reg_overlap_mentioned_p to break out of
the loop. Who cares if the reg is referenced (except aut
83 matches
Mail list logo
