https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71667
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71662
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671
--- Comment #5 from vineeshvs ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> > RAM: 3.7 GiB
>
> Well, you probably just need more RAM.
> Look for OOM killer messages in your system log.
>
> And please attach the preprocessed graph_blo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71667
alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |alahay01 at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71667
alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673
Bug ID: 71673
Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL:
c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-p-19.c -O2
(internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671
--- Comment #7 from vineeshvs ---
Created attachment 38772
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38772&action=edit
Results of 'make' command in terminal (without any other arguments)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671
vineeshvs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|WAITING
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71626
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
One possibility would be to allow SUBREG of constant for the V1XXmode vectors
like:
--- gcc/varasm.c.jj 2016-06-10 20:24:03.0 +0200
+++ gcc/varasm.c2016-06-27 11:43:25.330955071 +0200
@@ -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Well, we need to full gcc invocation of:
CXX graph_blockmodel.lo
So please run "make VERBOSE=1" and post the full gcc command line and
the preprocessed testcase.
All other output is useless.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71626
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38773
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38773&action=edit
gcc7-pr71626.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm, sparc
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71674
Bug ID: 71674
Summary: An exception is thrown on a valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526
--- Comment #24 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 38775
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38775&action=edit
Updated patch and test, match.pd/VRP
(In reply to amker from comment #23)
> Hmm, not sure if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660
--- Comment #3 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Foir double-word compare and exchange you need double-word alignment, so I
> think the current alignment is correct.
The instruction manual says that CMPXCHG16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36550
rootkit85 at yahoo dot it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71664
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71350
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71655
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71658
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71655
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36550
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Predicate analysis is not able to figure out this case because it cannot see
that the default def is also conditional on cond1_8(D) != 0, thus warn_15 is
never warn_5(D)(13).
(The callgraph is also a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71675
Bug ID: 71675
Summary: __atomic_compare_exchange_n returns wrong type for
typed enum
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
This bug also affects -pedantic-errors, i.e. it's not merely a cosmetic
bug but also a conformance issue. I don't know how -std=c11 can ignore
constraint violations but -pedantic-errors is supposed t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Rather than piecemeal fixes with no evidence of completeness, I think we
should disable the smarts around system header macro locations determining
whether diagnostics appear (i.e., the sys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71673
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm, sparc |arm*-*, sparc*-*,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71676
Bug ID: 71676
Summary: [avr] casesi won't handle switch values larger than 16
bits
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639
Frank Bergemann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||FBergemann at web dot de
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
--- Comment #19 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3)
> Except within a larger object, I'm not aware of any reason the cases of
> two objects following or not following each other in memory must be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 27 19:18:21 2016
New Revision: 237802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-27 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/70673
* frontend-passe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71677
Bug ID: 71677
Summary: PowerPC ISA 3.0 DImode load/store needs a fix
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71677
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 38777
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38777&action=edit
-save-temps file that generates the wrong input with -O3 -mcpu=power9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71678
Bug ID: 71678
Summary: [avr] ICE from switch / case on long long (casesi +
DImode)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71640
--- Comment #2 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Mon Jun 27 20:41:59 2016
New Revision: 237803
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237803&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-27 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/71640
* in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 27 20:54:56 2016
New Revision: 237804
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-27 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/70673
* frontend-passe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 27 20:57:13 2016
New Revision: 237805
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237805&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-27 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/70673
* frontend-passe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71627
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71627
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|AVR |avr
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71670
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux |powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue Jun 28 01:28:28 2016
New Revision: 237811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/71656
* config/rs6000/rs6000-cpus.def (IS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71675
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71544
--- Comment #7 from fortranbug at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to fortranbug from comment #6)
> Thank you for the suggested workaround. This can certainly be helpful in the
> short term. However, we would not want to rely on tuning compiler
> opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417
--- Comment #14 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj ---
Filed https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20302 to have the linker
treat -T like all other options - i.e. consider the last occurrence of an
option rather than the first one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71640
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71679
Bug ID: 71679
Summary: gcc silently accepts parameter number mismatch in
template redeclaration
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71640
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
See: PR71679
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71670
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Jun 28 05:56:41 2016
New Revision: 237813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Fix split of ashdi3_extswsli_dot for memory (PR71670)
The s
62 matches
Mail list logo