[Bug middle-end/71524] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71524 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug tree-optimization/71478] [7 Regression] ICE in tree-ssa-reassoc.c after r236564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71478 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71650] unnecessary call to __memcpy_chk emitted on a bounded copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71650 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/71386] Wrong code on c++14 (GCC trunk)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71386 --- Comment #3 from Anton Mitrokhin --- I see those warnings with -O3, but not with -O0. Why is that? I also do not see what is wrong with the code. Note, that clang with all warnings enabled (and ub sanitizer!) will also not produce any warning

[Bug c++/71386] Wrong code on c++14 (GCC trunk)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71386 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71386] Wrong code on c++14 (GCC trunk)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71386 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Anton Mitrokhin from comment #3) > I see those warnings with -O3, but not with -O0. Why is that? As the documentation says, this warning depends on optimizations. A bogus optimization that breaks

[Bug web/71666] New: profile-generate not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71666 Bug ID: 71666 Summary: profile-generate not documented Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web Assig

[Bug web/71666] profile-generate not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71666 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Instrumentation-Options.html#index-fprofile-generate-957

[Bug debug/71667] New: [7 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:192 w/ -g -O2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71667 Bug ID: 71667 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:192 w/ -g -O2 -ftree-vectorize Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/71666] profile-generate not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71666 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente --- ok so is just the sentence "" See Optimize Options" which needs to be changed...

[Bug c++/71386] Wrong code on c++14 (GCC trunk)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71386 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- Slightly simpler template auto List(XS...xs) { return [=](auto processList){return processList(xs...);}; }; auto l1 = List(42); auto foo = [](auto... xs1) { return [=]() { return l1([=](au

[Bug middle-end/71524] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71524 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > It is caused by r70018. Oops. It was caused by r235065.

[Bug target/71657] Wrong code on trunk gcc (std::out_of_range), westmere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71657 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'm not very motivated to debug this "code", please make sure you try the options suggested at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ to be sure the sanitizers don't find a problem.

[Bug target/71657] Wrong code on trunk gcc (std::out_of_range), westmere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71657 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Also compile with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG

[Bug c++/69775] thread_local extern variable causes linkage error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69775 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/69849] Some spec functions are undocumented in doc/invoke.texi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69849 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCONFI

[Bug c/71345] Warn about redundant conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71345 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug tree-optimization/71503] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "gen_phi_arg_condition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71503 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug tree-optimization/71563] [6/7 Regression] Regression in GCC-7.0.0's optimizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target Milestone|-

[Bug c++/71569] [5/6/7 regression] Crash: External definition of template member from template struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71569 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug c++/71577] [6/7 regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code (with extra struct initializer) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1117

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71577 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug tree-optimization/71575] [6/7 Regression] [graphite] internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2500

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug c++/71570] [6/7 regression] ICE on invalid variable capture in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:551

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71570 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug middle-end/71626] [4.9/5/6/7 regression] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in output_constant_pool_2, at varasm.c:3837)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71626 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c/71602] [6/7 regression] ICE on __builtin_va_arg in build_va_arg, at c-family/c-common.c:5810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71602 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug ipa/71633] [7 regression][CHKP] internal compiler error: in inline_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71633 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/71640] [7 Regression] include/c++/7.0.0/bits/hashtable.h:293:7: error: too many template parameters in template redeclaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71640 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug fortran/71623] [5/6/7 Regression] Segfault when allocating deferred-length characters to size of a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug c++/71630] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid C++14 code with variable templates: in get, at cgraph.h:395

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71630 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug target/71652] [7 Regression] ICE in in ix86_target_macros_internal, at config/i386/i386-c.c:187

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71652 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug middle-end/71654] [6/7 Regression] missing VRP optimization on c++ unsigned char and short expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71654 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mile

[Bug target/71657] Wrong code on trunk gcc (std::out_of_range), westmere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71657 --- Comment #5 from Anton Mitrokhin --- I have compiled this test case in several ways The first two emit no warnings and fail as described: > g++ -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -Ofast > -march=westmere -o out crash_i

[Bug libstdc++/71660] [5/6/7 regression] alignment of std::atomic<8 byte primitive type> (long long, double) is wrong on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/71553] [6 regression]ICE in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71553 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/71624] [6/7 regression][CHKP] internal compiler error: in duplicate_thunk_for_node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71624 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug debug/71667] [7 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:192 w/ -g -O2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71667 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target|

[Bug bootstrap/43714] missing check for zlib.h, fails to build lto-compress.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43714 Peter VARGA changed: What|Removed |Added CC||developm...@faf-ltd.com --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug fortran/71623] [5/6/7 Regression] Segfault when allocating deferred-length characters to size of a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug debug/71668] New: certain bitfields get negative DW_AT_bit_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71668 Bug ID: 71668 Summary: certain bitfields get negative DW_AT_bit_offset Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: de

[Bug middle-end/50168] __builtin_ctz() and intrinsics __bsr(), __bsf() generate suboptimal code on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50168 Aliaksei Kandratsenka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alkondratenko at gmail dot com -

[Bug debug/71668] certain bitfields get negative DW_AT_bit_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71668 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Is this on a little-endian or big-endian target? Read http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=081130.1 on why DW_AT_bit_offset is deprecated in DWARF Version 4.

[Bug debug/71668] certain bitfields get negative DW_AT_bit_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71668 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Is this on a little-endian or big-endian target? It is little-endian. Note that dwarf issues explains this fully. Basically DW_AT_bit_offset is defined nicely

[Bug debug/71668] certain bitfields get negative DW_AT_bit_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71668 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- bug 71669 for using DW_AT_data_bit_offset .

[Bug debug/71669] New: DW_AT_data_bit_offset is not emitted for dwarf4 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71669 Bug ID: 71669 Summary: DW_AT_data_bit_offset is not emitted for dwarf4 and above Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug debug/71669] DW_AT_data_bit_offset is not emitted for dwarf4 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71669 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note GDB does not support it yet: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12616

[Bug debug/71668] certain bitfields get negative DW_AT_bit_offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71668 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71657] Wrong code on trunk gcc (std::out_of_range), westmere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71657 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- The code is not readable. Where do you initialise v13? This is not reasonable code.

[Bug target/71657] Wrong code on trunk gcc (std::out_of_range), westmere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71657 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/70902] [7 Regression] GCC freezes while compiling for 'skylake-avx512' target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70902 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Jun 26 20:56:34 2016 New Revision: 237792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237792&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/70902 PR target/71453 PR target/

[Bug target/71453] Spills to vector registers are sub-optimal.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71453 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Jun 26 20:56:34 2016 New Revision: 237792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237792&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/70902 PR target/71453 PR target/

[Bug target/71657] Wrong code on trunk gcc (std::out_of_range), westmere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71657 --- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Jun 26 20:56:34 2016 New Revision: 237792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237792&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/70902 PR target/71453 PR target/

[Bug rtl-optimization/71596] [7 Regression] gcc bootstrap fails due to segv in genrecog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71596 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Jun 26 20:56:34 2016 New Revision: 237792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237792&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/70902 PR target/71453 PR target/

[Bug target/71555] [7 Regression] ICE: compilation "never" finishes with -O -mtune=sandybridge -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71555 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Jun 26 20:56:34 2016 New Revision: 237792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237792&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/70902 PR target/71453 PR target/

[Bug rtl-optimization/70902] [7 Regression] GCC freezes while compiling for 'skylake-avx512' target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70902 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak

[Bug target/71453] Spills to vector registers are sub-optimal.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71453 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71555] [7 Regression] ICE: compilation "never" finishes with -O -mtune=sandybridge -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71555 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak

[Bug rtl-optimization/71596] [7 Regression] gcc bootstrap fails due to segv in genrecog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71596 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak

[Bug target/71657] Wrong code on trunk gcc (std::out_of_range), westmere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71657 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak

[Bug bootstrap/70473] genautomata memory footprint for arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70473 --- Comment #8 from Benda Xu --- (In reply to BillyBarty from comment #7) > I was having this same issue building gcc 5.2.0 on my Raspberry Pi 3. Thank you for your report. Is your Raspberry Pi 3 running aarch64 (arm64) or arm (32 bit)?

[Bug bootstrap/70473] genautomata memory footprint for arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70473 --- Comment #9 from BillyBarty --- (In reply to Benda Xu from comment #8) > (In reply to BillyBarty from comment #7) > > I was having this same issue building gcc 5.2.0 on my Raspberry Pi 3. > > Thank you for your report. Is your Raspberry Pi

[Bug target/71670] New: powerpc64le ICE in extract_constrain_insn with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71670 Bug ID: 71670 Summary: powerpc64le ICE in extract_constrain_insn with -mcpu=power9 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c/70924] Wrong position for "warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces]"

--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160626 (experimental) [trunk revision 237789] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -c -Wmissing-braces check.c check.c:1:15: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] int a[3][1

[Bug target/71670] powerpc64le ICE in extract_constrain_insn with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71670 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- I have a fix.

[Bug c++/71671] New: g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671 Bug ID: 71671 Summary: g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus) Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/71671] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||memory-hog Severity|major

[Bug c++/71671] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671 --- Comment #2 from vineeshvs --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > >g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus) > > How much RAM do you have? What target is this on? RAM: 3.7 GiB --

[Bug c++/71671] g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71671 --- Comment #3 from vineeshvs --- (In reply to vineeshvs from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > >g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus) > > > > How much RAM do you have? What target is this on? > > R

[Bug gcov-profile/71672] New: inlining indirect calls does not work with autofdo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71672 Bug ID: 71672 Summary: inlining indirect calls does not work with autofdo Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: