[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 > > --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)

[Bug tree-optimization/71485] g++ ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu in “gimplify_expr”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71485 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug tree-optimization/71483] [7 Regression] g++ ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “Floating point exception”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71483 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alan.hayward at arm dot com Target Mi

[Bug c++/71482] Add -Wglobal-constructors warning option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71482 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71477] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71477 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/71475] Optimization of copying into long double looses bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71475 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #17) > But this also hints at the ABI for > > void foo (union U { int x; float y; }); > > changing with the patch, no? Or ultimatively at the FE using a bogus > c

[Bug tree-optimization/71477] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71477 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71477] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71477 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jun 10 07:30:45 2016 New Revision: 237287 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237287&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-06-10 Richard Biener PR middle-end/71477 * cfg

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #19 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #18) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #17) > > But this also hints at the ABI for > > > > void foo (union U { int x; float y; }); > > > > changing with the

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 > > --- Comment #19 from Uroš Bizjak --- > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #18) >

[Bug c/68657] [6 Regression] "gcc -Werror=sign-conversion test.i" shows invalid: -Wsign-conversion is not an option that controls warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68657 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 38672 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38672&action=edit gcc7-pr68657.patch Untested fix. With -Werror we even suggest in diagnostic -Werror=psabi, which doesn't actu

[Bug target/71475] [6/7 Regression] Optimization of copying into long double looses bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71475 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #21 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #19) > Following test doesn't compile with patched compiler: BTW: This is preexisting problem, on 64bit target we can trigger the issue with transparent unions with: --c

[Bug libstdc++/71107] wstring_convert::from_bytes produces wide chars with the wrong byte order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71107 --- Comment #4 from Bitterblue --- So, uh, any idea why this is happening?

[Bug sanitizer/71480] ASan should align string constants to shadow granularity.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71480 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- It most likely affects powerpc* too. Anyway, patch LGTM, preapproved for trunk with proper ChangeLog and if possible some reduced testcase (e.g. remove all headers, replace mkstemp/unlink/fstat functions wit

[Bug target/71475] [6/7 Regression] Optimization of copying into long double looses bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71475 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/71486] New: Transparent union doesn't work with long double for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71486 Bug ID: 71486 Summary: Transparent union doesn't work with long double for x86_64 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug sanitizer/71480] ASan should align string constants to shadow granularity.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71480 --- Comment #3 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Thanks, will post the fix in ML soon.

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Alexander Cherepanov from comment #12) > On 2016-06-09 11:22, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Would be nice to have a testcase for the SRA case as well. > > Source code: > > ---

[Bug c/71479] error on __builtin_add_overflow with bool or enum pointer as last argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71479 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/71487] New: sorry, unimplemented: mangling offset_ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71487 Bug ID: 71487 Summary: sorry, unimplemented: mangling offset_ref Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #23 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #21) > BTW: This is preexisting problem, on 64bit target we can trigger the issue > with transparent unions with: Followup in PR71486.

[Bug c++/71487] sorry, unimplemented: mangling offset_ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71487 --- Comment #1 from Chungmin Lee --- You might say that in the above scenario HasLength does not have to be a template, but it is just a simplified example.

[Bug target/71488] New: Wrong code on GCC trunk with ivybridge and westmere targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488 Bug ID: 71488 Summary: Wrong code on GCC trunk with ivybridge and westmere targets Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/71487] sorry, unimplemented: mangling offset_ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71487 --- Comment #2 from Chungmin Lee --- Command: g++ -std=c++11 a.cpp

[Bug target/71281] [7 Regression] ICE on gcc trunk on knl, wsm, ivb and bdw targets (tree-ssa-reassoc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281 --- Comment #8 from Anton Mitrokhin --- Is this fixed?

[Bug testsuite/71489] [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/attr-hotcold-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71489 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug testsuite/71489] New: [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/attr-hotcold-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71489 Bug ID: 71489 Summary: [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/attr-hotcold-2.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug tree-optimization/71407] [7 Regression] ICE at -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple: integral result type precision does not match field size of BIT_FIELD_REF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71407 --- Comment #8 from alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: alahay01 Date: Fri Jun 10 08:46:55 2016 New Revision: 237288 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237288&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-06-10 Alan Hayward gcc/ PR tree-optimizat

[Bug tree-optimization/71416] [7 Regression] ICE at -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (vectorizable_live_operation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71416 --- Comment #5 from alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: alahay01 Date: Fri Jun 10 08:46:55 2016 New Revision: 237288 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237288&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-06-10 Alan Hayward gcc/ PR tree-optimizat

[Bug target/71281] [7 Regression] ICE on gcc trunk on knl, wsm, ivb and bdw targets (tree-ssa-reassoc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281 --- Comment #9 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Anton Mitrokhin from comment #8) > Is this fixed? Yes. Is this still not working for you?

[Bug tree-optimization/71407] [7 Regression] ICE at -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple: integral result type precision does not match field size of BIT_FIELD_REF)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71407 alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug tree-optimization/71490] New: [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71490 Bug ID: 71490 Summary: [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-

[Bug tree-optimization/71490] [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71490 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/71491] gcc.dg/vect/slp-43.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/71491] New: gcc.dg/vect/slp-43.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491 Bug ID: 71491 Summary: gcc.dg/vect/slp-43.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c/71479] error on __builtin_add_overflow with bool or enum pointer as last argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71479 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- BTW, for __builtin_add_overflow_p with _Bool as last argument (which isn't rejected, going to fix that momentarily) we don't emit the expected test whether the result is 0/1, but whether it fits 8 bits unsign

[Bug tree-optimization/71439] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71439 alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug c/71381] C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Fri Jun 10 09:22:38 2016 New Revision: 237290 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237290&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c/71381] C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax

[Bug middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function decomposition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Fri Jun 10 09:22:51 2016 New Revision: 237291 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237291&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function de

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 > > --- Comment #21 from Uroš Bizjak --- > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #19) >

[Bug middle-end/71492] New: Read from volatile pointer is removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71492 Bug ID: 71492 Summary: Read from volatile pointer is removed Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug target/71493] New: [6/7 regression] accidental ABI change for structure return on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71493 Bug ID: 71493 Summary: [6/7 regression] accidental ABI change for structure return on PowerPC Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ABI

[Bug tree-optimization/71490] [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71490 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/71494] New: label as value in nested function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71494 Bug ID: 71494 Summary: label as value in nested function Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Ass

[Bug middle-end/71492] Read from volatile pointer is removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71492 --- Comment #1 from Christian Dietrich --- Bug in Compiler explorer the correct link is: https://godbolt.org/g/dqdVWR

[Bug target/71486] Transparent union doesn't work with long double for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71486 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I thought the ABI for transparent unions was that of passing its members. But int128 and long double are passed differently.

[Bug middle-end/71494] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] label as value in nested function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71494 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug target/71493] [6/7 regression] accidental ABI change for structure return on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71493 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/71486] Transparent union doesn't work with long double for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71486 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > I thought the ABI for transparent unions was that of passing its members. > > But int128 and long double are passed differently. Similar case compiles OK (value

[Bug c/71381] C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Fri Jun 10 09:46:04 2016 New Revision: 237295 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237295&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c/71381] C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax Bac

[Bug middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function decomposition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Fri Jun 10 09:46:18 2016 New Revision: 237296 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237296&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function de

[Bug c++/71372] [6/7 Regression] C++ FE drops TREE_THIS_VOLATILE in cp_fold on all tcc_reference trees

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stettberger at dokucode dot de --- Comm

[Bug middle-end/71492] Read from volatile pointer is removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71492 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/71491] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-43.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/71489] [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/attr-hotcold-2.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71489 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i386-pc-solaris2.*, |i386-pc-solaris2.*, |

[Bug c++/71472] Wlogical-op misses exhaustive-or case (... || A) || B

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71472 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/71486] Transparent union doesn't work with long double for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71486 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- Completely disabling TARGET_MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK, the testcase compiles OK: -O2 movabsq $-9223372036854775808, %rdi movl$16383, %esi callfoo movl$1, %edi

[Bug c/71381] C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Fri Jun 10 10:12:22 2016 New Revision: 237299 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237299&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR c/71381] C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax

[Bug middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function decomposition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Fri Jun 10 10:12:36 2016 New Revision: 237300 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237300&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function de

[Bug target/71475] [5/6/7 Regression] Optimization of copying into long double looses bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71475 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression]|[5/6/7 Regression] |Op

[Bug target/71475] [5/6/7 Regression] Optimization of copying into long double looses bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71475 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/71183] [7 Regression] gcc -E always gives __DATE__ and __TIME__ as Jan 1 1970 00:00:00

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71183 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/71013] [7 Regression] c-common.c:12810:37: error: 'LLONG_MAX' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71013 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug tree-optimization/71179] [7 Regression] ice fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2360

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71179 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c/69558] [6/7 Regression] glib2 warning pragmas stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- David, do we consider this fixed for real now with r233637, or is some further work planed?

[Bug c++/71495] New: [6 Regression] Spurious "note: initializing argument ... of ..." without any warning/error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495 Bug ID: 71495 Summary: [6 Regression] Spurious "note: initializing argument ... of ..." without any warning/error Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/71495] [6 Regression] Spurious "note: initializing argument ... of ..." without any warning/error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495 --- Comment #1 from Yury V. Zaytsev --- Created attachment 38678 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38678&action=edit Pre-processed class with GCC 6

[Bug rtl-optimization/71496] New: Two picbase loads created for libjava code on powerpc-darwin after rev 22022.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71496 Bug ID: 71496 Summary: Two picbase loads created for libjava code on powerpc-darwin after rev 22022. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c++/68581] ICE in build_conditional_expr_1 upon instantiation of a templated function with Cilk+ directives (valid code)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68581 Yury V. Zaytsev changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.2.1 |6.1.1 --- Comment #1 from Yury V. Zayt

[Bug rtl-optimization/71496] Two picbase loads created for libjava code on powerpc-darwin after rev 22022.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71496 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target|

[Bug driver/69028] ICE on *any* valid Cilk+ code C/C++: -fcilkplus is incompatible with -fprofile-arcs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69028 Yury V. Zaytsev changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.3.0 |6.1.1 --- Comment #2 from Yury V. Zayt

[Bug c++/71495] [6/7 Regression] Spurious "note: initializing argument ... of ..." without any warning/error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/71496] Two picbase loads created for libjava code on powerpc-darwin after rev 22022.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71496 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70824] [6/7 Regression] cc1plus consumes all available memory on specific template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug c++/71092] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:1449; only with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71092 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug fortran/70959] [6/7 Regression] Invalid type determination due to expression in a type declaration statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70959 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug c++/70977] [6/7 Regression] Out of memory during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug target/71342] [6/7 Regression][RL78] set1 / clr1 with !addr16 sometimes doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71342 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug fortran/70748] [6/7 Regression] ICE with debug in gfc_trans_block_construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70748 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug c++/70942] [6/7 Regression] [c++14] Incorrect deduction of generic lambda `auto&&` parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70942 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug c++/71227] [6/7 Regression] template friend function cannot be resolved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71227 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug lto/66295] [5/6/7 Regression] LTO generates incorrect resolver call for function multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug c++/71121] [6/7 Regression] Spurious warning: "the address of [...] will never be NULL [-Waddress]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71121 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug fortran/70673] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with module containing functions with allocatable character scalars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug target/71216] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect PPC assembly due to inserted .machine pseudo-op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71216 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4 Summary|[4.8/4.9/5/6/7

[Bug middle-end/71494] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] label as value in nested function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71494 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/70842] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error with character members within a polymorphic pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4

[Bug bootstrap/71013] [7 Regression] c-common.c:12810:37: error: 'LLONG_MAX' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71013 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-06-10, at 6:44 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > LLONG_MAX is no longer used in the code. Is this fixed now? It probably is but I haven't tested. I had updated patch to use int64_

[Bug bootstrap/71013] [7 Regression] c-common.c:12810:37: error: 'LLONG_MAX' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71013 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71408] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- So fixed?

[Bug target/64516] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] arm: wrong unaligned load generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug inline-asm/68843] ICE with "u" input constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Fri Jun 10 12:22:21 2016 New Revision: 237303 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237303&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc: 2016-06-10 Bernd Edlinger PR inline-asm/68843

[Bug inline-asm/68843] ICE with "u" input constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71323] [7 Regression] ice in verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71252] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed : definition in block 7 does not dominate use in block 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #23

[Bug tree-optimization/71170] [7 Regression] ICE in rewrite_expr_tree, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:3898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug tree-optimization/64716] Missed vectorization in a hot code of SPEC2000 ammp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64716 vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org -

  1   2   >