https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69068
--- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue May 31 07:07:26 2016
New Revision: 236907
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236907&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle 3-arg phi in copy_bb_and_scalar_dependences
2016-05-31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71351
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69068
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue May 31 07:27:23 2016
New Revision: 236908
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236908&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
backport "Handle 3-arg phi in copy_bb_and_scalar_dependences"
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71351
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71348
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71347
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com
Target M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 30 May 2016, romain.geissler at amadeus dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057
>
> Romain Geissler changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71352
Bug ID: 71352
Summary: ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in
zero_one_operation, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1251
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69068
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71352
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71311
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Bah, needs ref input and -Ofast to reproduce. Probably a latent issue
somewhere.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71248
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
I meant that all the active release branches are fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71353
Bug ID: 71353
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on
x86_64-linux-gnu: in binds_to_current_def_p, at
symtab.c:2232
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71346
--- Comment #3 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Tue May 31 08:05:24 2016
New Revision: 236909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
AVX-512. Limit constraint for scalar operand in split to AVX-512VL.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71352
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, it's factoring of -1 that is still broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71230
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71353
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71353
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |ipa
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71056
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue May 31 08:29:39 2016
New Revision: 236910
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236910&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR target/71056: Don't use vectorized builtins when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71056
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70923
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71354
Bug ID: 71354
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-23.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71355
Bug ID: 71355
Summary: Target not reachable svn link svn co
svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@223813
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71355
meerabo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71354
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71346
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71355
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38607|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71356
Bug ID: 71356
Summary: Unable to reach trunk
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 31 09:58:50 2016
New Revision: 236912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-31 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71347
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for reporting this.
The dump after IVOPT now is:
:
# prephitmp_21 = PHI
# prephitmp_23 = PHI
# ivtmp.17_16 = PHI
_6 = prephitmp_21 * prephitmp_23;
_4 = (void *) ivtmp.17_16;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
__attribute__((target("default"))) int foo() { return 1; }
__attribute__((target("arch=core2"))) int foo() { return 2; }
int main() {
if (foo() != 1 && foo() != 2)
__builtin_abort();
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71356
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |web
Version|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71356
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Anonymous connections are limited. Try again later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71354
--- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think the case requires vect_cond which isn't enabled for sparc in
target-supports.exp.
I will add the requirement to the test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71340
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kaushik.phatak@kpitcummins.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71311
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
It's rhfuhf.F (exclusively). Bisected with train, verified with ref. Now I'd
need the equivalent of the optimize attribute for fortran...
Well. Let's see if I can spot a reasonable difference in dumps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68696
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue May 31 11:23:59 2016
New Revision: 236918
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236918&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR target/68696 FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/vbslq_u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70390
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71311
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
It's rhfuhf.F:ROFOCK. Disabling vectorization fixes it. One notable
difference
before vectorization MIN/MAX recognition caused by missing swapped comparison
handling in
/* Transform (@0 < @1 and @0 < @2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71352
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 31 12:18:15 2016
New Revision: 236920
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236920&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-31 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71352
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71352
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70923
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> We have vect_recog_mult_pattern that should have triggered here but that
> only tries replacement with LSHIFT_EXPR rather than also a simple plus
> for 2 * x.
I g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71357
Bug ID: 71357
Summary: [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed
(error: definition in block follows the use for
SSA_NAME) w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70923
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
>> We have vect_recog_mult_pattern that should have triggered here but that
>> only tries replacement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71357
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70923
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > We have vect_recog_mult_pattern that should have triggered here but that
> > only tries replacement with LSHIFT_EX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71287
--- Comment #10 from Artem Polyakov ---
The same with gcc-6.1.0 (attached)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71287
--- Comment #11 from Artem Polyakov ---
Created attachment 38609
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38609&action=edit
req.i_gcc-6.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71287
--- Comment #12 from Artem Polyakov ---
Created attachment 38610
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38610&action=edit
req.s_gcc-6.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71287
--- Comment #13 from Artem Polyakov ---
Oh, now I see what was going on!
This is a really masked error:
while( (rc = connect(sd, (struct sockaddr*)&address, addrlen) < 0) && (errno ==
EAGAIN) );
instead of:
while( (rc = connect(sd, (struct so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71358
Bug ID: 71358
Summary: GNAT.Command_Line.Getopt fails if there are no
switches
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71287
Artem Polyakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
inker-build-id
--enable-linux-futex --program-suffix=-6 --without-system-libunwind
--enable-multilib --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-tune=generic
--build=x86_64-suse-linux --host=x86_64-suse-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.1.1 20160531 (SUSE Linux)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69184
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No longer reproduces on trunk and 6 branch, due to fix for PR69068.
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160531
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71359
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71359
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
commit eedd711b1de214484021ed233aef3d88b0c3988c
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon May 30 10:40:33 2016 +
* predict.h (force_edge_cold): Declare.
* predict.c (force_edge_cold): New function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71359
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Also ICEs if I change
char a[];
to
char a[1];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #7 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
---
Created attachment 38613
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38613&action=edit
Tentative patch for 6.1
Looks like the right fix will need to somehow differentiate between jump tabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71359
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057
--- Comment #10 from Romain Geissler ---
Thanks ! The current gcc6 branch works fine now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71248
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue May 31 17:17:29 2016
New Revision: 236931
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236931&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-05-31 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/71248
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71306
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue May 31 17:24:22 2016
New Revision: 236934
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236934&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71306 - bogus -Wplacement-new with an array element
gcc/cp/ChangeL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71306
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71248
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291
--- Comment #10 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
I've build Firefox locally with clang with optimizations disabled
(CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address -fsanitize-recover=address -O0") and got pretty the
same backtrace:
==12707==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71317
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue May 31 18:59:36 2016
New Revision: 236938
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236938&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads (clock_getres): Define.
(G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71317
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue May 31 18:59:45 2016
New Revision: 236939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236939&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads (clock_getres): Define.
(G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291
Georg Koppen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71358
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71227
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 31 19:16:26 2016
New Revision: 236941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71227 - specializing hidden friend
* pt.c (check_e
test.c: In function ‘main’:
test.c:5:10: warning: '0' flag ignored with precision and ‘%d’ gnu_printf
format [-Wformat=]
printf("abc" "%05.3d\n", 1);
^
abc 001
------
gcc version: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71361
Bug ID: 71361
Summary: [7 Regression] Changes in ivopts caused perf
regression on x86
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71360
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
Sorry, old bug number is wrong, this is split from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70813.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70813
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
Wrong position of this warning seems to be a separate issue, so I filed it as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70813 . This PR is about the fact
that this warning is emitted at all in this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55813
Kyle J Strand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyle.strand at beckman dot com
--- Comme
23 + sizeof(int[-1]);
^~~
--
gcc version: gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20160531 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 31 19:49:16 2016
New Revision: 236946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236946&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 31 19:49:16 2016
New Revision: 236946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236946&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60095
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 31 19:49:16 2016
New Revision: 236946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236946&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
Kris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kristopher.kuhlman at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71363
Bug ID: 71363
Summary: Issue when sizeof(double) = sizeof(long double)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71358
--- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1)
> The testcase yields a STORAGE_ERROR (segfault), which is not pretty indeed.
Presumably because the GNAT RTS is compiled with checks disabled? Here
(x8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330
--- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #10)
> I think the problem is with cp_fold_function() which does
>
> cp_walk_tree (&DECL_SAVED_TREE (fndecl), cp_fold_r, NULL, NULL);
>
> and cp_fold_r is itself r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
--- Comment #6 from Tom Honermann ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #5)
> PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates
I believe this was intended to refer to PR c++/70095.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71364
Bug ID: 71364
Summary: [7 regression] recent tuple changes break range-v3
merge.cpp
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71365
Bug ID: 71365
Summary: [7 Regression] g++ reject access to parent's parent
virtual method
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71364
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Error message:
In file included from include/range/v3/begin_end.hpp:23:0,
from include/range/v3/core.hpp:17,
from test/algorithm/merge.cpp:19:
include/range/v3/utility/dangl
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160531 (experimental) [trunk revision 236912] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c
$ gcc-6.1 -O3 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c
small.c: In function ‘fn1’:
small.c:4:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71367
Bug ID: 71367
Summary: std::time_get does not implement 'r' or 'p'
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71334
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
For reference, I get this output on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu:
underlying size_t: gcc long unsigned int, gccjit unknown
underlying uint32_t: gcc unsigned int, gccjit unsigned int
underlying uint64_t: gcc long unsi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71317
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue May 31 21:28:26 2016
New Revision: 236949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads (clock_getres): Define.
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71317
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
