https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71253
Bug ID: 71253
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE during loop distribution w/ -O2
-ftree-loop-distribution
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71249
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71240
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps better testcase that also shows a missed optimization:
struct L { unsigned int l[2]; };
union U { double a; struct L l; } u;
void
foo (double a, struct L *p)
{
u.a = a;
struct L l = u.l, m;
m.l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38549
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38549&action=edit
untested patch
testing this patch which fixes this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71144
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71236
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 24 07:55:56 2016
New Revision: 236630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236630&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-24 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/70434
PR c/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70434
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 24 07:55:56 2016
New Revision: 236630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236630&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-24 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/70434
PR c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71193
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you Jason for the clarification, I've just created issue in Chromium
bugzilla: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=614289
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 24 May 2016, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231
>
> --- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse ---
> -fwrapv seems to fix it. As far as I can te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231
--- Comment #14 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #13)
> On Tue, 24 May 2016, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231
> >
> > --- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lucdanton at free dot fr
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70827
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71230
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71239
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71230
--- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> There is another bug in this function remaining.
I indeed see :
bug.f90:47:0:
SUBROUTINE eri_test (iw,error)
in pp_string, at pretty-print.c:937
0x13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231
--- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #13)
> Anyone have a patch to rnflow that I can apply to the tester(s) to fix
> the issue?
It is easy enough to create a jsee_long of type integer(kind=8) and do th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69872
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70369
--- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon ---
I've committed my patch series for ARM: r236382, 236383, 236384, 236385,
236387, 236388, 236576, 236577, 236578, 236579, 236580.
At this stage, we can remove neon-testgen.ml and the files it generated.
Du
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70434
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
PER=/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --enable-plugins
--enable-lto --disable-bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71254
Bug ID: 71254
Summary: [5 regression][AArch64] ICE after backport of fix for
PR 67278
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71253
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Bah, so it's not only the case of BBs being removed (which I fixed) but
obviously
the case of edges being removed (we keep the edge-list from CD construction
time).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
Bug ID: 71255
Summary: Auto-annotate sockaddr related structs with may_alias
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71254
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71254
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |testsuite
--- Comment #3 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71254
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
The testcase passes on the GCC 6 branch.
On the GCC 5 branch, the testcase was introduced by this commit, I haven't
tried to compile it with an earlier revision.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71254
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 24 May 2016, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
>
> Marek Polacek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71254
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 24 10:47:40 2016
New Revision: 236633
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236633&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-24 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/71254
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Tue May 24 10:50:01 2016
New Revision: 236634
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236634&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-05-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70677
--- Comment #4 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru ---
Created attachment 38550
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38550&action=edit
testcase in attachment
for AVR platform arduino.h is the most that neither is a standard :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71234
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71256
Bug ID: 71256
Summary: GCC 4.2.1 compiler segfaults when compiling a sample C
file
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676
--- Comment #4 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru ---
Created attachment 38551
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38551&action=edit
testcase in attachment
without -no-optimize-sibling-call
reported bug can be found in MinimOsd_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71256
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71257
Bug ID: 71257
Summary: OpenMP declare simd linear with ref modifier doesn't
accept references to non-integer/non-pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71257
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69857
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue May 24 11:32:35 2016
New Revision: 236635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR target/69857 Remove bogus early return false; in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Can you provide an example how do you envision such a pragma? Should it only
have an effect on "sockaddr{,_*}"-named structs?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> Can you provide an example how do you envision such a pragma? Should it
> only have an effect on "sockaddr{,_*}"-named structs?
I expect that we'd put somethin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69857
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
But before I start, do y'all feel like this attribute should be applicable too
all symbols the may_alias attribute is applicable to? I.e. not just structs,
but other decls, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 24 May 2016, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
>
> --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
> But before I start, do y'all feel like th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71258
Bug ID: 71258
Summary: Missed optimizations: dynamic allocation, virtual
calls, empty destructors
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #9 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> While a pragma might work I'd say for the case in question we'd like to
> have a "tentative" forward declaration that can be merged with subsequent
> forward
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71240
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
I think the main issue is that init_symbolic_number doesn't constrain 'src's
type in any way (but blindly uses TYPE_PRECISION for example). That's not
going to work for vector types for example. It should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
--- Comment #4 from Pitchumani ---
Yes, it is incomplete.
These SUBREGs generated in rtl generation itself. define_insn for movqi bails
out for this bug. Have to check if could be handled in define_expand of
mov itself.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
Well, so far my plan is to gather symbols in
#pragma GCC may_alias SYMBOL
to some vector of symbols and then when declaring a SYMBOL check if it's in the
vector and if so, apply the may_alias attribute. Now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71258
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
inline void* operator new(std::size_t n){return __builtin_malloc(n);}
inline void operator delete(void*p, std::size_t){__builtin_free(p);}
And we get:
_5 = __builtin_malloc (16);
MEM[(struct model *)_5].D.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 24 May 2016, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
>
> --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
> Well, so far my plan is to gather symbo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71259
Bug ID: 71259
Summary: GCC trunk emits wrong code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71230
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71230
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 24 14:35:36 2016
New Revision: 236643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236643&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71230
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71240
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 24 14:40:35 2016
New Revision: 236644
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236644&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71240
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The following patch allows the program to compile. I just need to check the
standard to confirm if the syntax in question also applies to WRITE.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/io.c b/gcc/fortran/io.c
index da0e1c5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66338
--- Comment #8 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Patch available: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01914.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71260
--- Comment #1 from Slawomir Czarko-Wasiutycz ---
Created attachment 38554
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38554&action=edit
Program code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71260
Bug ID: 71260
Summary: Crash in DLL compiled with -fipa-pure-const and -flto
[mingw32]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67591
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70896
--- Comment #8 from PeteVine ---
Nice, any idea why `--disable-libstdcxx-dual-abi` should no longer work though?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71261
Bug ID: 71261
Summary: Trunk GCC hangs on knl and broadwell targets
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69504
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue May 24 16:14:34 2016
New Revision: 236647
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236647&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70434
PR c/69504
* c-c++-common/vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70434
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue May 24 16:14:34 2016
New Revision: 236647
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236647&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70434
PR c/69504
* c-c++-common/vec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71257
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue May 24 16:19:43 2016
New Revision: 236648
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236648&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71257
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_simd_clone_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71249
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue May 24 16:22:31 2016
New Revision: 236649
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236649&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71249
* gimplify.c (gimplify_switch_expr): Look in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71249
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71257
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue May 24 16:27:12 2016
New Revision: 236650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236650&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71257
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_simd_clone_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71261
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
It doesn't hang but takes some time to finish:
$time ./cc1plus -std=c++11 -O3 -march=broadwell -quiet hang.cpp
real0m25.003s
user0m24.412s
sys 0m0.275s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71262
Bug ID: 71262
Summary: ICE when compiling mozilla-central (rev 298652)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69872
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue May 24 16:41:39 2016
New Revision: 236651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236651&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-05-24 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/69872
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69872
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue May 24 16:44:09 2016
New Revision: 236652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-05-24 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/69872
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71261
--- Comment #2 from Anton Mitrokhin ---
Hm, sorry. It's creduce which apparently cut off more than it should have.
I'll send another reproducer soon...
BTW, 25 senonds on O3 seems a bit too much for such case)
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:25 PM, u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69872
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71240
--- Comment #11 from Roger Orr ---
Thanks.
I can confirm this also successfully compiles the original code from which I
derived the simplified example.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71263
Bug ID: 71263
Summary: ICE at -O1 and above in 32-bit and 64-bit mode on
x86_64-linux-gnu (in zero_one_operation)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71263
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71230
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71263
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Andreas S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
Bug ID: 71264
Summary: ICE in convert_move
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
--- Comment #3 from ikonomisma at googlemail dot com ---
I've just found a small change to the testcase that causes a *different* ICE to
appear:
void test(uint8_t *ptr, uint8_t *mask)
{
footype mv = {0,1,2,3};
for (size_t i = 0; i < 16; i +=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71230
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71261
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Anton Mitrokhin from comment #2)
> Hm, sorry. It's creduce which apparently cut off more than it should have.
> I'll send another reproducer soon...
Please check if it is not a duplicate of PR7090
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71262
--- Comment #1 from Georg Koppen ---
Created attachment 38556
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38556&action=edit
Compressed .ii file
Attached is the compressed .ii file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71257
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
