[Bug target/69857] gcc/config/arm/arm.c:15949: return in strange place ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69857 --- Comment #8 from David Binderman --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #7) > Yes, that's an approach that can be taken. Once such a case is found, you > could also try using a reducer program like creduce to create a small > testcase appropri

[Bug c++/71174] segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71174 --- Comment #2 from JD --- $ g++ -std=c++1z -Wall -Wextra -fconcepts bug.cpp bug.cpp:10:32: error: concept ‘constexpr bool InputIterator(T)’ declared with function parameters concept bool InputIterator(T it) { ^ g

[Bug target/71175] New: trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c: 2 * minor printf problems ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71175 Bug ID: 71175 Summary: trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c: 2 * minor printf problems ? Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority:

[Bug c++/71174] [concepts] Segmentation fault while processing concepts error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71174 --- Comment #3 from JD --- $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=local/gcc6.1/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.1.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-6.1.0/configure --prefix=local/gcc6.1 --e

[Bug target/69857] gcc/config/arm/arm.c:15949: return in strange place ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69857 --- Comment #10 from David Binderman --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #9) > Yes, would you like to propose a patch to gcc-patches? No thanks. > Or shall I do it? I would very much prefer that.

[Bug target/71175] trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c: 2 * minor printf problems ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71175 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack Status

[Bug target/69857] gcc/config/arm/arm.c:15949: return in strange place ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69857 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #8) > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #7) > > Yes, that's an approach that can be taken. Once such a case is found, you > > could also try using a red

[Bug c/71176] New: trunk/fixincludes/fixincl.c:162: bad % specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71176 Bug ID: 71176 Summary: trunk/fixincludes/fixincl.c:162: bad % specifier Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/71161] [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 --- Comment #16 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed May 18 15:45:08 2016 New Revision: 236404 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236404&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/71161 * elf.c (phdr_callback) [__i386__

[Bug c++/71147] [6 Regression] Flexible array member wrongly rejected in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71147 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/68739] FAIL: 30_threads/call_once/constexpr.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|redi at gcc dot

[Bug c++/70353] [5 regression] ICE on __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70353 --- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 18 15:59:00 2016 New Revision: 236408 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236408&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70353 - __func__ and constexpr gcc/ * tree-inline

[Bug c++/70648] [6 Regression] adplug-xmms fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70648 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 18 15:59:05 2016 New Revision: 236409 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236409&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70648 - constexpr empty list-initialization * cons

[Bug c++/70095] [C++14] Link error on partially specialized variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70095 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 18 15:58:54 2016 New Revision: 236407 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236407&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70095 - variable template partial specialization *

[Bug c++/70494] [5 regression] Internal Compiler Error: Capturing an array of vectors in a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70494 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 18 15:59:13 2016 New Revision: 236410 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236410&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70494 - lambda capture of array * decl.c (cxx_mayb

[Bug c++/70505] [4.9/5 Regression] Constexpr failure when template type specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70505 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 18 15:59:19 2016 New Revision: 236411 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236411&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70505 - partial instantiation of template-id * pt.

[Bug target/71161] [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 --- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed May 18 16:00:43 2016 New Revision: 236412 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236412&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/71161 * elf.c (phdr_callback) [__i386__

[Bug target/71161] [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/71177] New: [6 Regression] Spurious -Waggressive-loop-optimizations warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71177 Bug ID: 71177 Summary: [6 Regression] Spurious -Waggressive-loop-optimizations warning Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69793] ICE on invalid code in "cp_lexer_peek_nth_token"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69793 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed May 18 16:26:35 2016 New Revision: 236414 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236414&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2016-05-18 Paolo Carlini PR c++/69793 *

[Bug c++/69793] ICE on invalid code in "cp_lexer_peek_nth_token"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69793 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/69708] ipa inline not working for function reference in static const struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Wed May 18 16:38:56 2016 New Revision: 236416 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236416&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Indirect inlining of targets from references of global constants 2016-0

[Bug ipa/69708] ipa inline not working for function reference in static const struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Wed May 18 16:41:19 2016 New Revision: 236417 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236417&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Const parameters are always unmodified 2016-05-18 Martin Jambor

[Bug ipa/69708] ipa inline not working for function reference in static const struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Wed May 18 16:44:08 2016 New Revision: 236418 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236418&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Allow constant global VAR_DECLs in constant jump functions 2016-05-18

[Bug ipa/69708] ipa inline not working for function reference in static const struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70466] [ICE on invalid code in tree check: expected constructor, have parm_decl in convert_like_real, at cp/call.c:6371 with -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70466 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed May 18 17:17:03 2016 New Revision: 236419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236419&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2016-05-18 Paolo Carlini PR c++/70466 *

[Bug c++/70466] [ICE on invalid code in tree check: expected constructor, have parm_decl in convert_like_real, at cp/call.c:6371 with -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70466 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini --- Fixed for 6.2 too.

[Bug tree-optimization/71031] [6/7 Regression] ICE in extract_range_from_binary_expr_1, at tree-vrp.c:2535 w/ -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71031 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/70505] [4.9/5 Regression] Constexpr failure when template type specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70505 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 18 17:40:49 2016 New Revision: 236420 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236420&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/70505 - partial instantiation of template-id * pt.

[Bug c++/71178] New: lots of C++ exception test failures on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71178 Bug ID: 71178 Summary: lots of C++ exception test failures on x86_64 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/71179] New: ice fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2360

k dated 20160518 and the flags -funsafe-math-optimizations -O2 -msse4.1 does this ../../plugins/dcp/dcp-sse4.c: In function ‘render_SSE4’: ../../plugins/dcp/dcp-sse4.c:356:1: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2360 0x901dc9 fold_convert_loc(unsigned int, tree_node*, tr

[Bug target/71179] [7 Regression] ice fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2360

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71179 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/71180] New: [7 Regression] r236373 breaks x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71180 Bug ID: 71180 Summary: [7 Regression] r236373 breaks x86 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug middle-end/71180] [7 Regression] r236373 breaks x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71180 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/71178] lots of C++ exception test failures on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71178 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71180] [7 Regression] r236373 breaks x86 exception handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71180 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||EH, wrong-code Status|UNCONF

[Bug fortran/71156] PURE interface/definition inconsistency: accepts invalid, rejects valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156 --- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson --- Thanks! D > On May 18, 2016, at 12:18 AM, pault at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156 > > Paul Thomas changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug c/71115] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/71145] Alpha: Error: No lda !gpdisp!278 was found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71145 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed May 18 19:15:22 2016 New Revision: 236423 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236423&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/71145 * config/alpha/alpha.md (trap): Ad

[Bug libstdc++/71181] New: Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 Bug ID: 71181 Summary: Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/71115] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7) > Thanks, Manuel. That does the trick. Let me put a patch together. Note also that the extra: uu.c:3:26: note: (near initialization for ‘a’) is just a rel

[Bug libstdc++/71181] Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 --- Comment #1 from Alexey Dmitriev --- in n4582 it's already not valid as they've change 23.2.5p15 to <=

[Bug libstdc++/71181] Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 Alexey Dmitriev changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.1.0 |6.1.0 --- Comment #2 from Alexey Dmitr

[Bug target/71145] Alpha: Error: No lda !gpdisp!278 was found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71145 --- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed May 18 19:39:49 2016 New Revision: 236425 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236425&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/71145 * config/alpha/alpha.md (trap): Ad

[Bug target/71145] Alpha: Error: No lda !gpdisp!278 was found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71145 --- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed May 18 19:41:34 2016 New Revision: 236426 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236426&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/71145 * config/alpha/alpha.md (trap): Ad

[Bug c/71176] trunk/fixincludes/fixincl.c:162: bad % specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71176 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack Status|UNCONF

[Bug target/71145] Alpha: Error: No lda !gpdisp!278 was found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71145 --- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed May 18 19:53:16 2016 New Revision: 236427 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236427&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/71145 * config/alpha/alpha.md (trap): Ad

[Bug target/71145] Alpha: Error: No lda !gpdisp!278 was found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71145 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71177] Spurious -Waggressive-loop-optimizations warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71177 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/71176] trunk/fixincludes/fixincl.c:162: bad % specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71176 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1) > I wonder why GCC -Wformat does not catch this, since "static const char" > literals contents should be visible as formatting strings. In this case, it > d

[Bug c++/71182] New: parser.c cp_lexer_previous_token sanitizer detects member call on null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71182 Bug ID: 71182 Summary: parser.c cp_lexer_previous_token sanitizer detects member call on null pointer Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c/71176] trunk/fixincludes/fixincl.c:162: bad % specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71176 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #2) > The compiler only sees code that gets through the preprocessor. > Still worth fixing, in my view. 2e9 bytes isn't a lot of source code these > days. In

[Bug preprocessor/71183] New: gcc -E always gives __DATE__ and __TIME__ as Jan 1 1970 00:00:00

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71183 Bug ID: 71183 Summary: gcc -E always gives __DATE__ and __TIME__ as Jan 1 1970 00:00:00 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/71184] New: ICE on "operator new["

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71184 Bug ID: 71184 Summary: ICE on "operator new[" Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: un

[Bug middle-end/66110] uint8_t memory access not optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66110 Pedro Alves changed: What|Removed |Added CC||palves at redhat dot com --- Comment #16 f

[Bug c++/71184] ICE on "operator new["

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71184 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71185] New: ice in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:4873

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71185 Bug ID: 71185 Summary: ice in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:4873 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tar

[Bug c++/71100] [6/7 regression] Internal compiler error while calling a pointer to member function that throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71100 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed May 18 21:23:07 2016 New Revision: 236430 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236430&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/71100 * cgraph.c (cgraph_edge::redirect_call_stmt_t

[Bug c++/71100] [6/7 regression] Internal compiler error while calling a pointer to member function that throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71100 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed May 18 21:24:16 2016 New Revision: 236431 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236431&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/71100 * cgraph.c (cgraph_edge::redirect_call_stmt_t

[Bug sanitizer/71160] libasan: Backport support for malloc within dlsym

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71160 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed May 18 21:26:54 2016 New Revision: 236432 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236432&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-05-17 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug sanitizer/71160] libasan: Backport support for malloc within dlsym

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71160 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed May 18 21:28:49 2016 New Revision: 236433 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236433&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-05-17 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/71100] [6/7 regression] Internal compiler error while calling a pointer to member function that throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71100 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/71183] [7 Regression] gcc -E always gives __DATE__ and __TIME__ as Jan 1 1970 00:00:00

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71183 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6.1.1 |7.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/71181] Reserving in unordered_map doesn't reserve enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug preprocessor/71183] [7 Regression] gcc -E always gives __DATE__ and __TIME__ as Jan 1 1970 00:00:00

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71183 --- Comment #2 from James Clarke --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Works on GCC 6.1.0 release: > # 1 "" > # 1 "" > # 1 "" > # 31 "" > # 1 > "/data1/src/gcc-cavium/toolchain-6/thunderx-tools/aarch64-thunderx-linux-gnu/ > sys-root/u

[Bug target/71186] New: PowerPC64: Autovectorised code hits ICE with -O3 -mpower9 -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71186 Bug ID: 71186 Summary: PowerPC64: Autovectorised code hits ICE with -O3 -mpower9 -mlra Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/71170] [7 Regression] ICE in rewrite_expr_tree, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:3898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170 --- Comment #7 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 38519 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38519&action=edit Another way to fix Thanks Martin Liška for looking into this. I am attaching another way to fox this.

[Bug libstdc++/71187] New: declval() can be implemented without requiring a template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71187 Bug ID: 71187 Summary: declval() can be implemented without requiring a template instantiation Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhance

[Bug c++/69670] Useless -Wenum-compare when comparing parallel enums in static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69670 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/71187] declval() can be implemented without requiring a template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71187 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69672] Useless -Wenum-compare when comparing enum vaue against the same value in enum hack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69672 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/71188] New: missing warning converting __builtin_offsetof and sizeof to pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71188 Bug ID: 71188 Summary: missing warning converting __builtin_offsetof and sizeof to pointer Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/71183] [7 Regression] gcc -E always gives __DATE__ and __TIME__ as Jan 1 1970 00:00:00

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71183 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/71115] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01423.html

[Bug middle-end/71177] Spurious -Waggressive-loop-optimizations warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71177 Tavian Barnes changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38516|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/71188] missing warning converting constant integer expression zero to pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71188 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|missing warning converting |missing warning converting

[Bug c++/71184] ICE on "operator new["

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71184 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01424.html

[Bug c/71188] missing warning converting constant integer expression zero to pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71188 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Unlike the diagnostics for values that are not constant integers, any diagnostic for these cases must not be a pedwarn, because converting an arbitrary integer constant expression with valu

[Bug c++/71189] New: ICE with VLA with second dimension from a function call expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71189 Bug ID: 71189 Summary: ICE with VLA with second dimension from a function call expression Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/71171] [6/7 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in can_be_stored_compactly_p (line-map.c:148)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71171 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01425.html

[Bug driver/69265] Option suggestion provides a wrong hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu May 19 00:52:08 2016 New Revision: 236439 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236439&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR driver/69265: add hint for options with misspelled arguments opts-c

[Bug driver/69265] Option suggestion provides a wrong hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69265 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71189] ICE with VLA with second dimension from a function call expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71189 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58646] ICE on a multidimensional VLA with an empty initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58646 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jaak at ristioja dot ee --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug c++/71147] [6 Regression] Flexible array member wrongly rejected in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71147 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||69698 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug libstdc++/69769] arithmetic operation on pointer to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com,

[Bug c++/69872] [6/7 Regression] -Wnarrowing note without warning/errror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69872 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/70097] Cannot assign ref-qualified non-static member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70097 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70163] C++ DR 257 constructor forward to virtual base class's constructor in an abstract class required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70163 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71170] [7 Regression] ICE in rewrite_expr_tree, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:3898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170 --- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- My patch is not going to work. At tree-ssa-reassoc.c:3897, we have: stmt: _15 = _4 + c_7(D); oe->op def_stmt: _17 = c_7(D) * 3; : a1_6 = s_5(D) * 2; _1 = (long int) a1_6; x1_8 = _1 + c_7(D); a2

[Bug tree-optimization/71170] [7 Regression] ICE in rewrite_expr_tree, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:3898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170 --- Comment #9 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- We could also move _17 = c_7(D) * 3; at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:3897 satisfy the gcc_assert. We could do this based on the use count of _17? any suggestions?

<    1   2