https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087
--- Comment #11 from Nick ---
Created attachment 38492
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38492&action=edit
make check output
I recompiled gcc on the Opteron6136 machine.
I ran the test-suite:
make -k check > test.out
Doing:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71120
Bug ID: 71120
Summary: Aliasing "struct sockaddr_storage" produces invalid
code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71121
Bug ID: 71121
Summary: Spurious warning: "the address of [...] will never be
NULL [-Waddress]"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71122
Bug ID: 71122
Summary: 'make distclean' should not try to remove
libiberty/testsuite dir
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087
Nick changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70959
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I have tried changing the matching order so that integer constants are matched
before real or complex. It fixes the reported problem but results in numerous
test suite failures.
I wonder. If we just change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69603
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun May 15 18:34:57 2016
New Revision: 236253
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236253&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-15 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/69603
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71123
Bug ID: 71123
Summary: Namelist read failure on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69603
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun May 15 18:48:40 2016
New Revision: 236254
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236254&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-15 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/69603
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71123
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71118
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71118
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71119
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71118
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Okay, looking...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yselkowi at redhat dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70862
Tom Honermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at honermann dot net
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
Tom Honermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at honermann dot net
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
--- Comment #3 from Tom Honermann ---
The error in comment 2 was also reported in bug 69364.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71124
Bug ID: 71124
Summary: Compiler enters infinite loop on Microblaze with
-O1/-O2/-O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70862
--- Comment #3 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com ---
It's a different bug. The test case from 70095 compiles fine with the trunk
from 20160428, but the above example won't.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71125
Bug ID: 71125
Summary: [concepts] Spurious 'invalid reference to function
concept error' issued when overloads are not all
declared with the concept specifier
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69603
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun May 15 21:01:50 2016
New Revision: 236256
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236256&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-15 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/69603
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69603
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71126
Bug ID: 71126
Summary: [concepts] ICE on ill-formed code declaring a variable
with a non-type concept
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71127
Bug ID: 71127
Summary: [concepts] ICE on ill-formed code declaring a variable
with a template concept
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71124
Thomas Petazzoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.9.3 |6.1.0
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Peta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71128
Bug ID: 71128
Summary: [concepts] ICE on ill-formed explicit instantiation of
a function concept
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71129
Bug ID: 71129
Summary: [concepts] ICE on ill-formed explicit instantiation of
a variable concept
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.2.0 |6.1.0
--- Comment #2 from Yaakov Selk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71130
Bug ID: 71130
Summary: [concepts] Ill-formed code declaring a variable with a
non-type concept not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71131
Bug ID: 71131
Summary: [concepts] Ill-formed code declaring a variable with a
template concept not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64375
--- Comment #2 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
Still not working with 6.1.0 m32c-elf at calls.c:3679.
/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160515 (experimental) [trunk revision 236250] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O3 abc.c
abc.c: In function ‘main’:
abc.c:6:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
int main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71133
Bug ID: 71133
Summary: msp430-elf -mlarge FTBFS in libstdc++-v3
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71118
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
This is caused by https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01445.html .
After the change, the hard (argument) register is no longer propagated
into the (set (int reg) (subreg of fp reg)), and then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68807
Adrian Bibby Walther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71092
schoko.teddy at web dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schoko.teddy at web dot de
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71092
--- Comment #4 from schoko.teddy at web dot de ---
(In reply to schoko.teddy from comment #3)
> Created attachment 38494 [details]
> Preprocessed source
>
> This Error occurs while compiling this motioncontrollayer.cpp file from a Qt
> project. G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71134
Bug ID: 71134
Summary: GCC fails to build with in-tree dependencies:
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: boo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71135
Bug ID: 71135
Summary: rl78-elf libstdc++ FTBFS with some multilibs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71136
Bug ID: 71136
Summary: [concepts] Spurious 'converting overloaded function is
ambiguous' error.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71137
Bug ID: 71137
Summary: [concepts] Spurious 'symbol is already defined' error
issued when declaring a constrained non-template
function overload.
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71138
Bug ID: 71138
Summary: [concepts] ill-formed non-constant expression use in
nested requirement produces duplicated diagnostics
with poor source locations
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71139
Bug ID: 71139
Summary: [concepts] ill-formed compound-requirement lacking a
semicolon not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71140
Bug ID: 71140
Summary: [concepts] ill-formed nested-requirement lacking a
semicolon not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71141
Bug ID: 71141
Summary: [concepts] Example variadic concept code in the
Concepts TS 14.1p9.4 rejected
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71141
--- Comment #1 from Tom Honermann ---
If it is decided that this code is well-formed, then I think the declaration of
f7() in t3.cpp should be added to the example in the Concepts TS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
--- Comment #4 from Tom Honermann ---
(In reply to Tom Honermann from comment #3)
> The error in comment 2 was also reported in bug 69364.
I don't know where I got that bug number from. That should have been:
The error in comment 2 was also rep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70947
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon May 16 04:51:21 2016
New Revision: 236264
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236264&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RS6000] Stop regrename twiddling with split-stack prologue
PR targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70862
--- Comment #4 from Tom Honermann ---
(In reply to ryan.burn from comment #3)
> It's a different bug. The test case from 70095 compiles fine with the trunk
> from 20160428, but the above example won't.
The example in bug 70095 comment 2 still fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70964
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70947
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71092
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to schoko.teddy from comment #3)
> Created attachment 38494 [details]
> Preprocessed source
>
> This Error occurs while compiling this motioncontrollayer.cpp file from a Qt
> project. Gzipped
54 matches
Mail list logo
