https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70720
--- Comment #1 from sh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sh
Date: Tue May 10 07:11:00 2016
New Revision: 236064
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236064&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RTEMS] Fix moxie libgcc support
libgcc/
PR libgcc/70720
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71039
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71039
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71040
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71040
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
So optimize_bit_field_compare does make a difference implementation-wise
(but not really fixes the undefinedness in the boost code wrt the access
of the non-active union-member when reading from is_short).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70988
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, so trying to preserve alias-set zero from the BIT_FIELD_REF folding using
a MEM_REF and reference_alias_ptr_type doesn't work as the latter doesn't
preserve the langhook effects (duh, that's some inter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
Lorenz Hüdepohl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs at stellardeath dot org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67483
--- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Yes I confirm it is in trunk:
../../gcc7/gcc/combine.c:7727:40: runtime error: shift exponent -1 is negative
combine.c:7727 is "& unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) 1 << count)) - 1)) == 0"
count==-1 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29756
Bug 29756 depends on bug 28367, which changed state.
Bug 28367 Summary: accessing via union on a vector does not cause vec_extract
to be used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28367
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28367
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 10 08:20:43 2016
New Revision: 236066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236066&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/70497
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70497
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70497
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 10 08:20:43 2016
New Revision: 236066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236066&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/70497
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28367
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71039
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71034
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71031
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71041
Bug ID: 71041
Summary: mIPS:
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
The patch hints at type merging not being performed properly. AFAIR I saw
that for some of the eventually late built "global" types in the backend:
/* Calling abi specific va_list type nodes. */
static G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71022
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71031
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
I'd like to give this a try.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70964
Chengnian Sun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042
Bug ID: 71042
Summary: libtsan requires __pointer_chk_guard@GLIBC_PRIVATE (6)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70964
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #4)
>
> Hi,
>
> May I know how did you find this bug-triggering test case? Is it generated
> by some program generator or from the torture test suite?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71043
Bug ID: 71043
Summary: MIPS: Don't generate multiple lo_sums to access
unaligned symbols or fields in packed structures
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The symbol is provided by ld-linux-aarch64.so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue May 10 10:22:16 2016
New Revision: 236071
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236071&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/70255
* c-decl.c (diagnose_mismatched_decls): War
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71041
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71022
--- Comment #2 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> IRA might choose to do this as part of life-range splitting/shortening. Note
> that reg-reg moves may be cheaper code-size wise (like on CISC archs with
> non-fixed ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
max changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maximilien.levesque at gmail
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255
--- Comment #12 from shatz at dsit dot co.il ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #11)
> I added the warning, so closing as fixed.
Warning is nice, but IMHO it is far more important to document the behavior in
online documentation, includi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255
--- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek ---
So what exactly is not documented?
And I disagree that a warning isn't necessary just because something is
documented -- that applies for almost any warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71005
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 10 11:25:06 2016
New Revision: 236072
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236072&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/71005 fix post-increment for filesystem iterators
PR l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71044
Bug ID: 71044
Summary: Optimize std::filesystem implementation
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71044
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 38461
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38461&action=edit
Make directory iterators lazy
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> Directory iterators currently c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70755
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71045
Bug ID: 71045
Summary: [SH] gcc.dg/torture/pr68264.c -O0 and -Os failures
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71046
Bug ID: 71046
Summary: gcov time hog
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70255
--- Comment #14 from shatz at dsit dot co.il ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #13)
> So what exactly is not documented?
>
> And I disagree that a warning isn't necessary just because something is
> documented -- that applies for almost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71037
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71037
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 10 12:22:32 2016
New Revision: 236074
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236074&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/71037 Add base path to filesystem::canonical exceptions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71046
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71036
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67992
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67992
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Shorter testcase:
struct A
{
char a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9;
char b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, b8, b9;
char c1, c2, c3, c4, c5;
};
struct A s;
int
main ()
{
if (__builtin_expect (s.a1 < 0 ||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71045
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #0)
> Kaz, do you know what's going wrong there? Some silent wrong code related
> to fenv maybe?
Maybe, though I have no idea for what is going on.
You can see that tho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
[...]
>> * One thing I wonder about is runtime/config/sparc/os-fence.h: when using
>> __sync_synchronize, gcc emits membar #StoreLoad, while S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70986
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
The following fixes it for me, making sure the loop is rejected early by
if-conversion.
Index: gcc/cfganal.c
===
--- gcc/cfganal.c (revi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71045
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #1)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #0)
> > Kaz, do you know what's going wrong there? Some silent wrong code related
> > to fenv maybe?
>
> Maybe, though I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71036
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 10 13:04:21 2016
New Revision: 236076
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236076&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/71036 Handle EEXIST in filesystem::create_directory
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71039
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue May 10 13:13:59 2016
New Revision: 236079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236079&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-05-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71039
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70986
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71039
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
of file test.f90
Fortran runtime error: Attempting to allocate already allocated variable 'y'
$ gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 7.0.0 20160510 (experimental)
Notice that the dummy argument "y" of "set" has intent(out), so that
its component "f" can not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002
--- Comment #11 from Tavian Barnes ---
Yeah I reported the Boost bug as https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/12183.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71038
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I can't reproduce this with any version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71048
Bug ID: 71048
Summary: unexpected/invalid handling of partially aligned
volatile
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70720
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill ---
Sebastian, should this be applied to other branches?
Should the PR be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70963
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue May 10 14:27:12 2016
New Revision: 236082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-05-10 Bill Schmidt
PR target/70963
* con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70935
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue May 10 14:26:37 2016
New Revision: 236081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236081&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2016-05-10 Yuri Rumyantsev
Backport from mainline r2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70927
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue May 10 14:30:02 2016
New Revision: 236083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70927
* config/i386/sse.md (_andnot3),
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71038
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71038
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 10 15:39:14 2016
New Revision: 236084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/71038 fix error checks in filesystem::copy_file
PR lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71044
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70786
--- Comment #8 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue May 10 15:56:27 2016
New Revision: 236086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/70786
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70227
Jiong Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-none-eabi |arm-none-eabi,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70877
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue May 10 16:06:36 2016
New Revision: 236088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/70877
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_add_boun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70963
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue May 10 16:07:04 2016
New Revision: 236089
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236089&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-05-10 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70799
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue May 10 16:08:42 2016
New Revision: 236090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236090&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/70799
* config/i386/i386.c (dimode_sca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70963
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue May 10 16:09:28 2016
New Revision: 236091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-05-10 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue May 10 16:15:20 2016
New Revision: 236092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236092&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR driver/70132: Avoid double fclose in driver-arm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68030
--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's not only the vectorizer generating CSE sub-optimal code, pre and lim also
do this kind of transform.
Compiling the attached example with below command line
$ ./gcc -S -Ofast -march=haswell pr6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70877
--- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I confirm fixed in 6.1.0 and trunk.
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70916
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue May 10 16:59:04 2016
New Revision: 236094
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236094&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-05-03 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68030
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On May 10, 2016 6:25:57 PM GMT+02:00, "amker at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68030
>
>--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
>It's not only the v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70963
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue May 10 17:24:32 2016
New Revision: 236097
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-05-10 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70963
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71049
Bug ID: 71049
Summary: [6/7 Regression] libstdc++ fails to build
--with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible
--disable-libstdcxx-dual-abi
Product: gcc
Version: 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684
--- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on 7, 6, 5, and 4.9. and closing. Please let me know if further
problems arise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70684
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71050
Bug ID: 71050
Summary: [7 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/lhs-1.c
fails starting with r236066
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44382
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71051
Bug ID: 71051
Summary: incorrect sparc64 code generated, inevitable jump to
null function pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71051
--- Comment #1 from Martin Husemann ---
Created attachment 38465
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38465&action=edit
generated asm code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44382
--- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt ---
I'd propose that this bug can now be closed. If nobody objects, I'll do that
later this week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71052
Bug ID: 71052
Summary: Use of Range Based For Loop in unsupported dialect
results in malformed code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71053
Bug ID: 71053
Summary: [6.1 regression] Volatile read optimized into endless
loop
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71054
Bug ID: 71054
Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_2, at
expr.c:8097
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71054
--- Comment #1 from John Ettedgui ---
Created attachment 38466
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38466&action=edit
The .ii file in gzip format
The standard .ii was too big to be attached so I gzipped it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71047
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71049
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This should be dealt with at the same time as PR 65762
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71049
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Actually, the errors involving CTORDTOR suggest this is a problem with the TM
library support. I think that's meant to be disabled completely with
--disable-libstdcxx-dual-abi, but seems to be causing a boo
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
