[Bug tree-optimization/71006] [6/7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in conditional expression) w/ -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71006 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/70937] [7 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70937 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 9 07:42:45 2016 New Revision: 236021 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236021&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-05-09 Richard Biener PR fortran/70937 * trans

[Bug fortran/70937] [7 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70937 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/71013] [7 Regression] c-common.c:12810:37: error: 'LLONG_MAX' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71013 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug c/71013] [7 Regression] c-common.c:12810:37: error: 'LLONG_MAX' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71013 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/71006] [6/7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in conditional expression) w/ -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71006 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking, |

[Bug middle-end/71002] [6/7 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short string optimization implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/70986] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in combine_blocks, at tree-if-conv.c:2219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70986 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/71002] [6/7 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short string optimization implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- The issue is similar to that in PR70054 in that for example string::swap_data copy-initializes repr_t which has the long_raw_t member that is not of the type that it is modified as (for some odd reason). (j

[Bug tree-optimization/71016] New: [6/7 Regression] Redundant sign extension with conditional __builtin_clzl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71016 Bug ID: 71016 Summary: [6/7 Regression] Redundant sign extension with conditional __builtin_clzl Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: misse

[Bug fortran/66328] Wrong initialization of derived-type DATA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66328 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The bug reappears on trunk if I revert r230580.

[Bug tree-optimization/70985] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70985 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/70986] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in combine_blocks, at tree-if-conv.c:2219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70986 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Same cause as the other PR. 2016-05-03 Jakub Jelinek Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/70916 * tree-if-conv.c: Include cfganal.h. (pass_if_conversion::execute): C

[Bug target/71017] New: libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c:346:17: runtime error: left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71017 Bug ID: 71017 Summary: libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c:346:17: runtime error: left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int' Product: gcc Version:

[Bug middle-end/70992] Infinite recursion between fold_build2_stat_loc and fold_binary_loc w/ -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70992 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code Status|UN

[Bug bootstrap/70997] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70997 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/71015] [7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1881

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71015 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug middle-end/70992] Infinite recursion between fold_build2_stat_loc and fold_binary_loc w/ -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70992 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I think the issue is that the associate case treats (0 % 0 + 1) * 2 as constant but that gets further "simplified" when combined with the rest. In the end our refusal to simplify 0 % 0 to 0 causes things to

[Bug ipa/71015] [7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1881

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71015 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/70985] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70985 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- This wasn't supposed to apply to non-registers even though technically it could. I'm going to disable that on GIMPLE instead [I'm still thinking on how to deal with "memory" stuff in match.pd]

[Bug tree-optimization/70985] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70985 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/66940] ifcvt.c:1907 signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66940 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/70984] Templated derived class erroneously allows taking address of private base class member functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70984 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Please check the known bugs linked to from PR 59002 as I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate of one of them.

[Bug c++/26904] A template named the same as its member confuses lookup through inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26904 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- For the record, it seems to have first been fixed for GCC 4.5

[Bug c++/70996] regression - infinite compilation of sequence overrided operator<

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70996 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/71005] recursive_directory_iterator::operator++(int) incorrectly implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71005 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69523] -Wliteral-suffix should not warn within namespace std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- We already support that flag, but the warning that you get on the declaration of operator""s is not controlled by that flag. The warning should be controlled by *some* flag, but I'm not sure whether or not

[Bug c++/71010] error: 'begin' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71010 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/43319] Lack of documentation on asm extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43319 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/39440] User Manual: describe asm ("%a0,%c0"::)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39440 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/30527] Use of input/output operands in __asm__ templates not fully documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30527 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pi3orama at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug inline-asm/30527] Use of input/output operands in __asm__ templates not fully documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30527 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr --- Com

[Bug libstdc++/71005] recursive_directory_iterator::operator++(int) incorrectly implemented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71005 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakel

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon May 9 10:09:37 2016 New Revision: 236023 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236023&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libstdc++/71004 fix recursive_directory_iterator default constructor

[Bug bootstrap/70997] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70997 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- only seen when configured with --enable-default-pie

[Bug lto/71018] New: lto + ipa-pta causes exception with trivial boost::ptime code.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71018 Bug ID: 71018 Summary: lto + ipa-pta causes exception with trivial boost::ptime code. Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/71019] New: AVX512BW instructions emitted even without AVX512BW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71019 Bug ID: 71019 Summary: AVX512BW instructions emitted even without AVX512BW Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug lto/71018] lto + ipa-pta causes exception with trivial boost::ptime code.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71018 --- Comment #1 from riad93 at mail dot ru --- Accidentaly sent before adding info -v: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/opt/gcc-6/bin/c++-6.1 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/gcc-6/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.1.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-lin

[Bug target/71019] AVX512BW instructions emitted even without AVX512BW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71019 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/71018] lto + ipa-pta causes exception with trivial boost::ptime code.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71018 --- Comment #2 from riad93 at mail dot ru --- Created attachment 38449 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38449&action=edit preprocessed code It's in tar.gz since it's too big for upload here as plaintext

[Bug lto/71018] lto + ipa-pta causes exception with trivial boost::ptime code.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71018 riad93 at mail dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38449|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/71016] [6/7 Regression] Redundant sign extension with conditional __builtin_clzl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71016 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71016] [6/7 Regression] Redundant sign extension with conditional __builtin_clzl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71016 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/71016] [6/7 Regression] Redundant sign extension with conditional __builtin_clzl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71016 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kuganv at linaro dot org --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakel

[Bug lto/71018] lto + ipa-pta causes exception with trivial boost::ptime code.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71018 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Possibly related to PR70760 or PR70785. Can't reproduce with GCC 6 branch head (so I'd say 70785), building GCC 6.1.0 right now.

[Bug tree-optimization/71020] New: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 13 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71020 Bug ID: 71020 Summary: SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 13 which are marked as MUST COALESCE. Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/71013] [7 Regression] c-common.c:12810:37: error: 'LLONG_MAX' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71013 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-05-09, at 4:26 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71013 > > Richard Biener changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/71020] [6/7 Regression] SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 13 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71020 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Eric Fiselier from comment #1) > recursive_directory_iterator it; > assert(it.recursion_pending() == false); > assert(it.recursion_pending() == true); N.B. This test is undefined,

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon May 9 11:50:01 2016 New Revision: 236028 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236028&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libstdc++/71004 fix recent additions to testcase PR libstdc++/71

[Bug tree-optimization/71020] [6/7 Regression] SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 13 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71020 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug middle-end/71002] [6/7 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short string optimization implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 --- Comment #3 from Tavian Barnes --- Because their long_t is not POD. I don't know why that is though. It could be POD if they removed the default/copy constructors and assignment operator. Actually they're probably worried about custom alloc

[Bug target/68945] enable libcilkrts on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38221|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/71002] [6/7 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short string optimization implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 9 May 2016, tavianator at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 > > --- Comment #3 from Tavian Barnes --- > Because their long_t is not POD. I don't

[Bug tree-optimization/70985] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70985 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 9 12:23:11 2016 New Revision: 236032 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236032&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-05-09 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/70985

[Bug tree-optimization/70985] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70985 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/70785] LTO bootstrap with IPA PTA is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70785 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||riad93 at mail dot ru --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug lto/71018] lto + ipa-pta causes exception with trivial boost::ptime code.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71018 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/70826] [7 regression] many test cases fail starting with r235442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70826 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Mon May 9 12:35:25 2016 New Revision: 236033 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236033&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [RS6000] Fragile testcase breaks with -frename-registers PR testsu

[Bug testsuite/70826] [7 regression] many test cases fail starting with r235442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70826 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|amodra at gcc d

[Bug testsuite/71021] New: [libatomic testsuite] Test program compilation fail (missing -pthread flag)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021 Bug ID: 71021 Summary: [libatomic testsuite] Test program compilation fail (missing -pthread flag) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug middle-end/71002] [6/7 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short string optimization implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 --- Comment #5 from Tavian Barnes --- > But if it is not POD then assuming it gets copied correctly when > init-constructing a POD union where they placed such object is > an interesting assumption... Hrm? They seem to always copy it manually w

[Bug lto/70955] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation for __builtin_ms_va_list with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug testsuite/71021] [libatomic testsuite] Test program compilation fail (missing -pthread flag)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71021 nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug rtl-optimization/71022] New: GCC prefers register moves over move immediate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71022 Bug ID: 71022 Summary: GCC prefers register moves over move immediate Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-

[Bug middle-end/71002] [6/7 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short string optimization implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 9 May 2016, tavianator at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 > > --- Comment #5 from Tavian Barnes --- > > But if it is not POD then assuming it ge

[Bug fortran/71023] New: Problem with associate and function returning derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71023 Bug ID: 71023 Summary: Problem with associate and function returning derived type Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/71024] New: Missing warning for contradictory attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71024 Bug ID: 71024 Summary: Missing warning for contradictory attributes Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/71004] recursive_directory_iterator does not have a user-provided default ctor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71004 --- Comment #6 from Eric Fiselier --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > (In reply to Eric Fiselier from comment #1) > > recursive_directory_iterator it; > > assert(it.recursion_pending() == false); > > assert(it.recursio

[Bug libstdc++/71025] New: std::call_once aborts instead of propagating an exception (AIX 6.1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71025 Bug ID: 71025 Summary: std::call_once aborts instead of propagating an exception (AIX 6.1) Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/71023] Problem with associate and function returning derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71023 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70957] testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug middle-end/71002] [6/7 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short string optimization implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/60483] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => derived_type() ) [i.e. w/ structure constructor]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60483 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrestelli at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug middle-end/71002] [6/7 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing breaks Boost's short string optimization implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71002 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Note that ultimatively the error is still that is_short () accesses the wrong union member. I'll still see whether there is a bug in optimize_bit_field_compare.

[Bug target/70957] testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Looks like it also did not fail in the latest gcc-testresults Power7 BE run. Going to stop looking at this unless/until it shows up again.

[Bug fortran/70953] Reallocation on assignment does not work with debug flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70953 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/52162] Bogus -fcheck=bounds with realloc on assignment to unallocated LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52162 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrestelli at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug libstdc++/71025] std::call_once aborts instead of propagating an exception (AIX 6.1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71025 --- Comment #1 from Vojtech Fried --- I am sorry, probably duplicate of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146

[Bug fortran/56226] Add support for DEC UNION and MAP extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226 --- Comment #29 from Fritz Reese --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #25) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O0 execution test > FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O1 execution test > FAIL: gfortran.dg/dec_union_4.f90 -O2 exec

[Bug libstdc++/69699] libstdc++ ABI documentation is out of date

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69699 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- There is no such macro.

[Bug fortran/71014] associate statement inside omp parallel do appears to disable default private attribute for inner loop indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/70955] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation for __builtin_ms_va_list with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955 Domani Hannes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssbssa at yahoo dot de --- Comment #9 fr

[Bug fortran/71014] associate statement inside omp parallel do appears to disable default private attribute for inner loop indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014 --- Comment #2 from Keith Lindsay --- Created attachment 38454 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38454&action=edit output from gfortran -v

[Bug fortran/71014] associate statement inside omp parallel do appears to disable default private attribute for inner loop indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014 --- Comment #3 from Keith Lindsay --- Created attachment 38455 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38455&action=edit output from gfortran -v

[Bug fortran/71014] associate statement inside omp parallel do appears to disable default private attribute for inner loop indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014 --- Comment #4 from Keith Lindsay --- Thanks for taking a look. I've attached the output from the command gfortran -v -fopenmp openmp_nested_loops.f90 -o openmp_nested_loops on two different systems where I'm seeing the problem.

[Bug target/70894] ICE when using neon intrinsic with mabi=apcs-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70894 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Statu

[Bug tree-optimization/71026] New: Missing division optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026 Bug ID: 71026 Summary: Missing division optimizations Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug target/70904] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) with -fno-split-wide-types @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70904 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug lto/70955] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation for __builtin_ms_va_list with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955 --- Comment #10 from zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net --- (In reply to vries from comment #8) > Created attachment 38453 [details] > tentative patch vries, thank you very much. I verified and looks good. Built GCC 6.1.0 with patch from re

[Bug c++/71010] error: 'begin' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71010 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/71027] New: -fsanitize=address catches out of bounds access on assumed size array only with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71027 Bug ID: 71027 Summary: -fsanitize=address catches out of bounds access on assumed size array only with -O0 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug lto/70955] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code generation for __builtin_ms_va_list with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70955 --- Comment #11 from Domani Hannes --- I can confirm that this patch works for windows as well.

[Bug middle-end/71028] New: [7 regression] ICE in redirect_jump, at jump.c:1560

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71028 Bug ID: 71028 Summary: [7 regression] ICE in redirect_jump, at jump.c:1560 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/71014] associate statement inside omp parallel do appears to disable default private attribute for inner loop indices

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #5 from

[Bug libstdc++/71025] std::call_once aborts instead of propagating an exception (AIX 6.1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71025 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/66146] call_once not C++11-compliant on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 71025 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/71029] New: large fold expressions compile slowly with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71029 Bug ID: 71029 Summary: large fold expressions compile slowly with -Wall Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

  1   2   >